Entire Volume 17 issue 1 - Journal of World-Systems Research ...
Entire Volume 17 issue 1 - Journal of World-Systems Research ...
Entire Volume 17 issue 1 - Journal of World-Systems Research ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BOOK REVIEWS 256<br />
poverty alleviation and equity, its bottom line is still the protection <strong>of</strong> free market liberalism<br />
which promotes corporate pr<strong>of</strong>it through the super-exploitation <strong>of</strong> the poor and the steady<br />
eradication <strong>of</strong> all social welfare. The subjectivities forged by the post-Washington Consensus<br />
model <strong>of</strong> development which insist on both entrepreneurial and responsible citizenry allow for the<br />
displacement <strong>of</strong> blame for poverty alleviation. Subjects <strong>of</strong> this new neoliberal regime are required<br />
to assume certain disciplined behaviors in exchange for social safety nets and the price to pay for<br />
failure is destitution and neglect. In addition, the Bank’s new attempts to respond to the crisis <strong>of</strong><br />
social reproduction very deftly deflect attention away from the fact that few new jobs have been<br />
created and existing jobs are both precarious and poorly remunerated. In fact, I would argue that<br />
Bedford’s lack <strong>of</strong> attention to the Bank’s primary economic motivation serves to naturalize the<br />
hegemony <strong>of</strong> neoliberalism, as if there really are no (longer) any alternatives.<br />
That being said, Kate Bedford’s argument that neoliberalism’s global hegemony cannot<br />
be fully understood without a lens focused specifically on gender and sexuality is an essential<br />
contribution to the literature on international development, globalization, and neoliberal<br />
macroeconomics.<br />
Claire Laurier Decoteau<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Sociology<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Illinois at Chicago<br />
decoteau@uic.edu<br />
Cervantes-Rodríguez, Margarita, Ramón Grosfoguel, and Eric Mielants, eds. 2009.<br />
Caribbean Migration to Western Europe and the United States: Essays on Incorporation,<br />
Identity, and Citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University. 261 pages, ISBN 978-1-59213-<br />
954-5 Cloth ($59.50).<br />
Midst a flurry <strong>of</strong> recent scholarly and journalistic accounts <strong>of</strong> increasing immigration to<br />
industrial, capitalist democracies, Caribbean Migration to Western Europe and the United States<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers a paradigmatic approach to understanding the complexities <strong>of</strong> immigrant integration and<br />
identity. The majority <strong>of</strong> recent comparative research tends to focus on European and American<br />
political responses to immigration rates or the impact <strong>of</strong> incorporation regimes or other nationallevel<br />
policies on immigrants’ economic or cultural integration. While these remain important<br />
topics <strong>of</strong> inquiry, researchers privilege either variation in national policies or variation in the<br />
human capital <strong>of</strong> particular immigrant groups when explaining integration success or failure.<br />
Moreover, most studies lump together foreign-born populations when explaining native-born<br />
population’s attitudinal or behavioral response to immigration. Caribbean Migration takes a<br />
different approach. In this edited volume, Margarita Cervantes-Rodríguez, Ramón Grosfoguel,<br />
and Eric Mielants bring together research that considers the legacies <strong>of</strong> colonialism on immigrant<br />
integration and identity. Ultimately, they provide an analytically refreshing and unique approach<br />
to understanding immigrant experiences.<br />
In their introduction to the book, Cervantes-Rodríguez, Grosfoguel, and Mielants make a<br />
convincing case for applying the coloniality <strong>of</strong> power argument to the transnational experiences<br />
<strong>of</strong> Caribbean emigrants. Cervantes-Rodríguez and her colleagues make two important points.<br />
First, they argue that methodological nationalism has, ironically, imposed boundaries on