Entire Volume 17 issue 1 - Journal of World-Systems Research ...
Entire Volume 17 issue 1 - Journal of World-Systems Research ...
Entire Volume 17 issue 1 - Journal of World-Systems Research ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
61 JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH<br />
been obtained from the market, as long as the buyer is primarily concerned with their use values<br />
rather than their exchange values.<br />
Economic life, or the market, involves the exchange or circulation <strong>of</strong> goods according to<br />
set rules between relatively small buyers and sellers:<br />
The economy, in the sense in which I wish to use the word, was a world <strong>of</strong><br />
transparence and regularity, in which everyone could be sure in advance, with the<br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> common experience, how the processes <strong>of</strong> exchange would operate.<br />
This was always the case on the town market-place … And it was the case too,<br />
even if the distance was greater, for any regular trade <strong>of</strong> which the origins,<br />
conditions, routes and markets were fixed. (1982:455)<br />
He acknowledges that there are two different senses <strong>of</strong> the word market: “On one hand it is used,<br />
in a very loose sense, <strong>of</strong> all types <strong>of</strong> exchange that go beyond self-sufficiency …” Thus we have<br />
urban markets or a gold market (1982:223). “On the other hand, the word ‘market’ is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
applied to a rather large broad form <strong>of</strong> exchange, also known as the market economy …”<br />
(1982:223-4). “Historically, one can speak <strong>of</strong> a market economy, in my view, when prices in the<br />
markets <strong>of</strong> a given area fluctuate in unison …” (1982: 227). This, Braudel thinks, has been the<br />
case in Europe since the twelfth century. The latter use <strong>of</strong> the word is what he is referring to when<br />
he speaks <strong>of</strong> economic life. Finally, because this market system was freely competitive and run<br />
by small traders and merchants, only small pr<strong>of</strong>its were earned; Braudel refers to it as “microcapitalism”<br />
(1981: 562).<br />
The top layer <strong>of</strong> Braudel’s schema is the zone <strong>of</strong> capitalism:<br />
[T]he agents and men involved were not the same … the rules <strong>of</strong> the market<br />
economy regarding, for instance, free competition as described in classical<br />
economics, although visible at some levels, operated far less frequently in the<br />
upper sphere, which is that <strong>of</strong> calculation and speculation. At this level, one<br />
enters a shadowy zone, a twilight area <strong>of</strong> activities by the initiated which I<br />
believe to lie at the very root <strong>of</strong> what is encompassed by the term capitalism: the<br />
latter being an accumulation <strong>of</strong> power (one that bases exchange on the balance <strong>of</strong><br />
strength, as much as, or more than on the reciprocity <strong>of</strong> needs) a form <strong>of</strong> social<br />
parasitism … (1982:22)<br />
Braudel refers to it as the “anti-market” because the laws <strong>of</strong> the market do not apply here, or they<br />
apply only rarely. Consequently, this is the sphere in which the large pr<strong>of</strong>its are made. 2<br />
A<br />
defining characteristic <strong>of</strong> capitalism is its flexibility and adaptability. Opportunities for huge<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>its opened up at different times, in different places, and in different spheres <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
activity. Capitalists had to be ready to take advantage <strong>of</strong> the opportunities when they arose: “the<br />
characteristic advantage <strong>of</strong> standing at the commanding heights <strong>of</strong> the economy … consisted<br />
2<br />
For a detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> the distinction between the market and capitalism, see Wallerstein (2001:<br />
207-<strong>17</strong>).