Colletotrichum: complex species or species ... - CBS - KNAW
Colletotrichum: complex species or species ... - CBS - KNAW
Colletotrichum: complex species or species ... - CBS - KNAW
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The <strong>Colletotrichum</strong> acutatum <strong>species</strong> <strong>complex</strong><br />
to iron grey, growth rate 19–21 mm in 7 d (29–32.5 mm in 10 d).<br />
Conidia in mass whitish to pale salmon.<br />
Material examined: P<strong>or</strong>tugal, Mirandela, T<strong>or</strong>re de D. Chama, from anthracnose on<br />
fruit of Olea europaea, Dec. 2003, P. Talhinhas (<strong>CBS</strong> H-20724 holotype, culture<br />
ex-type <strong>CBS</strong> 129953 = PT250). USA, Washington, Long Beach, from Vaccinium<br />
macrocarpon, 1993, Carris, culture <strong>CBS</strong> 131322 = DAOM 233523.<br />
Notes: Talhinhas et al. (2005, 2009, 2011) found a diverse range of<br />
C. acutatum isolates from olive fruit with anthracnose symptoms in<br />
P<strong>or</strong>tugal. One of these strains, PT250 (=<strong>CBS</strong> 129953) was found<br />
to be significantly divergent from other groups within C. acutatum<br />
based on ITS and beta-tubulin sequences, and was placed in the<br />
new clade A6. Talhinhas’s olive strain here f<strong>or</strong>ms the type of C.<br />
rhombif<strong>or</strong>me. A second strain that we identified as C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me<br />
and included here was isolated from Vaccinium macrocarpon<br />
(American cranberry) in the USA, and was studied by Robideau<br />
et al. (2008). Further representatives of this clade are likely to be<br />
some of those isolated from Rhododendron in Sweden and Latvia<br />
(strains S2, L3, L4, L5, L6) by Vinnere et al. (2002) that were<br />
rep<strong>or</strong>ted to belong to clade A6 by Sreenivasaprasad & Talhinhas<br />
(2005) based on ITS sequencing. Since ITS does not distinguish<br />
between all <strong>species</strong>, sequences of additional genes would be<br />
necessary to confirm this placement.<br />
A variety of Glomerella rufomaculans, Ga. rufomaculans var.<br />
vaccinii Shear was described from leaves of Vaccinium macrocarpon<br />
in New Jersey, USA with conidia and ascosp<strong>or</strong>es that agree in<br />
size with C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me. Its conidia were described as oblongcylindric,<br />
subclavate, sometimes slightly curved (Shear 1907).<br />
The variety was wrongly listed as Ga. fructigena var. vaccinii in<br />
Sylloge Fung<strong>or</strong>um (Saccardo & Trotter 1913); MycoBank and Index<br />
Fung<strong>or</strong>um list this taxon as separate <strong>species</strong>, Ga. rufomaculansvaccinii<br />
Shear, MycoBank also as Ga. rufomaculansvaccinii<br />
(<strong>or</strong>thographic variant) and additionally as Ga. fructigena var.<br />
vaccinii. However a strain (<strong>CBS</strong> 124.22) deposited 1922 in the <strong>CBS</strong><br />
collection by L.C. Shear as Ga. rufomaculans var. vaccinii is lacking<br />
host inf<strong>or</strong>mation and belongs to the C. gloeosp<strong>or</strong>ioides <strong>complex</strong><br />
(Weir et al. 2012, this issue).<br />
<strong>Colletotrichum</strong> rhombif<strong>or</strong>me is closely related to C. acerbum, C.<br />
australe, C. kingh<strong>or</strong>nii and C. ph<strong>or</strong>mii, which together f<strong>or</strong>m a sister<br />
clade to C. salicis. In this study, only strains of C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me and<br />
C. salicis f<strong>or</strong>med sexual m<strong>or</strong>phs in culture. The ascosp<strong>or</strong>es of the<br />
two <strong>species</strong> have the same size, but differ in shape. Additionally,<br />
conidia of C. salicis f<strong>or</strong>med on SNA are smaller than those of C.<br />
rhombif<strong>or</strong>me, and conidia of C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me f<strong>or</strong>med on Anthriscus<br />
stem are sometimes ellipsoidal <strong>or</strong> limonif<strong>or</strong>m while those of C.<br />
salicis are unif<strong>or</strong>mly cylindrical.<br />
<strong>Colletotrichum</strong> rhombif<strong>or</strong>me is separated from other <strong>species</strong> by<br />
all sequences studied except the CHS-1 sequence, which is the<br />
same as that of C. acerbum. It can best be identified with TUB2<br />
and ITS. The closest match in a blastn search with the TUB2<br />
sequence of <strong>CBS</strong> 129953 with 100 % identity was AJ748624,<br />
the sequence generated from the same isolate by Talhinhas et<br />
al. (2005), all other isolates showed ≤ 97 % sequence identity.<br />
With the GAPDH sequence there was no closer match than 88<br />
% identity. Closest matches with the ITS sequence (with 100 %<br />
identity) were AJ749700 from isolate PT250 (= <strong>CBS</strong> 129953)<br />
(Talhinhas et al. 2005), AF411704, AF411706, AF411707 and<br />
AF411719 from Rhododendron isolates L3, L5, L6, S2 from Latvia<br />
and Sweden (Vinnere et al. 2002) and with 99 % identity (1 bp<br />
difference) AF411705 from Rhododendron isolate L4 (Vinnere et<br />
al. 2002) and EF672241 from Vaccinium isolate DAOM 233253 (=<br />
<strong>CBS</strong> 131322, the other isolate of C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me included in this<br />
study) (Robideau et al. 2008).<br />
<strong>Colletotrichum</strong> salicis (Fuckel) Damm, P.F. Cannon &<br />
Crous, comb. nov. MycoBank MB800518. Fig. 27.<br />
Basionym: Sphaeria salicis Fuckel, Jahrb. nass. Ver. Naturk. 23–<br />
24: 115. 1870.<br />
≡ Sphaeria salicis Auersw., in Fuckel, Fungi Rhen. no. 913, in sched.<br />
1864, nom. nud.<br />
≡ Physalosp<strong>or</strong>a salicis (Fuckel) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 1: 439. 1882.<br />
≡ Physosp<strong>or</strong>ella salicis (Fuckel) Höhn., Annls mycol. 16: 58. 1918.<br />
≡ Anisostomula salicis (Fuckel) Petr., Hedwigia 65: 198. 1925.<br />
≡ Plectosphaera salicis (Fuckel) Arx & E. Müll., Beitr. Kryptfl. Schweiz 11<br />
(no. 1): 204. 1954.<br />
≡ Glomerella salicis (Fuckel) L. Holm, in Holm & Ryman, Thunbergia 30:<br />
6. 2000.<br />
= Phyllach<strong>or</strong>a amenti Rostr., Skr. Christiana Vidensk.-Selsk. F<strong>or</strong>handl. 9: 5.<br />
1891.<br />
≡ Haplothecium amenti (Rostr.) Theiss. & Syd., Annls Mycol. 13: 615.<br />
1915.<br />
≡ Glomerella amenti (Rostr.) Arx & E. Müll., Beitr. Kryptfl. Schweiz 11 (no.<br />
1): 197. 1954.<br />
= Glomerella lycopersici F. Krüger, Arbeiten Kaiserl. Biol. Anst. Land- F<strong>or</strong>stw.<br />
9: 308. 1913.<br />
≡ Gloeosp<strong>or</strong>ium lycopersici F. Krüger, Arbeiten Kaiserl. Biol. Anst. Land-<br />
F<strong>or</strong>stw. 9: 308. 1913.<br />
≡ <strong>Colletotrichum</strong> kruegerianum Vassiljevsky, Fungi Imperfecti Parasitici 2:<br />
321. 1950 [non C. lycopersici Chester 1891].<br />
= Physalosp<strong>or</strong>a miyabeana Fukushi, Annls phytopath. Soc. Japan 1 (no. 4):<br />
7. 1921.<br />
≡ Glomerella miyabeana (Fukushi) Arx, Phytopath. Z. 29: 448. 1957.<br />
Sexual m<strong>or</strong>ph developed on Anthriscus stem. Ascomata globose<br />
to pyrif<strong>or</strong>m, ostiolate, medium brown, darker towards the ostiole,<br />
150–200 × 185–250 µm. Peridium 10–15 µm thick, composed<br />
of pale to medium brown flattened angular cells 5–15 µm diam.<br />
Ascogenous hyphae hyaline, smooth-walled, delicate. Interascal<br />
tissue composed of paraphyses, hyaline, septate, 30–80 × 2–3.5<br />
µm, widest part at the base, tips round. Asci cylindrical, 55–88<br />
× 8–12 µm, 8-sp<strong>or</strong>ed. Ascosp<strong>or</strong>es arranged uni- to biseriately,<br />
aseptate, hyaline, smooth-walled, ovoid, fusif<strong>or</strong>m, cigar-shaped<br />
<strong>or</strong> cylindrical, one end acute and one end obtuse <strong>or</strong> both ends<br />
obtuse, sometimes very slightly curved, (12.5–)13–15(–17) ×<br />
(4.5–)5–6(–6.5) µm, mean ± SD = 14.1 ± 1.1 × 5.4 ± 0.5 µm,<br />
L/W ratio = 2.6.<br />
Asexual m<strong>or</strong>ph on SNA. Vegetative hyphae 1–8 µm diam,<br />
hyaline to pale brown, smooth-walled, septate, branched.<br />
Chlamydosp<strong>or</strong>es not observed. Conidiomata absent,<br />
conidioph<strong>or</strong>es f<strong>or</strong>med directly on hyphae. Setae not observed.<br />
Conidioph<strong>or</strong>es hyaline, smooth-walled, simple <strong>or</strong> septate<br />
and branched. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, smooth-walled,<br />
cylindrical to elongate ampullif<strong>or</strong>m, sometimes intercalary (necks<br />
not separated from hyphae by a septum), 5–20 × 2–3.5 µm,<br />
opening 1–1.5 µm diam, collarette 0.5–1 µm long, periclinal<br />
thickening visible. Conidia hyaline, smooth-walled, aseptate,<br />
straight, cylindrical to clavate with one end round and one end ±<br />
acute to truncate, (8.5–)10.5–15.5(–19.5) × (3.5–)3–4.5(–5) µm,<br />
mean ± SD = 13.0 ± 2.4 × 4.0 ± 0.5 µm, L/W ratio = 3.2, conidia<br />
of strains <strong>CBS</strong> 115.14 and <strong>CBS</strong> 465.83 narrower, measuring (9–)<br />
10.5–15(–17) × 2.5–3.5(–4) µm, mean ± SD = 12.7 ± 2.3 × 3.1<br />
± 0.5 µm, L/W ratio = 4.1 and (7.5–)9.5–15.5(–22) × 3–3.5(–4.5)<br />
µm, mean ± SD = 12.4 ± 3.1 × 3.3 ± 0.4 µm, L/W ratio = 3.8.<br />
Appress<strong>or</strong>ia single <strong>or</strong> in small groups, medium brown, outline<br />
mostly clavate, elliptical <strong>or</strong> ovate, the edge entire <strong>or</strong> undulate,<br />
rarely lobate, (6–)8–15(–19.5) × (5–)6.5–8.5(–9.5) µm, mean ±<br />
SD = 11.5 ± 3.5 × 7.6 ± 1.0 µm, L/W ratio = 1.5.<br />
www.studiesinmycology.<strong>or</strong>g<br />
97