Colletotrichum: complex species or species ... - CBS - KNAW

Damm et al.
than in many other regions of the world. Sampling bias is likely an
explanation for this phenomenon.
In some Colletotrichum species complexes there is little or no
evidence of host specificity even at species level (e.g. Johnston
& Jones 1997, Damm et al. 2009), while others appear to be
associated with single host genera and/or families, e.g. in the
C. graminicola and C. orbiculare species complexes (Crouch et
al. 2009, Liu et al. 2007). There are indications that a few of the
segregate taxa within the C. boninense complex are host-specific,
or at least show preference for hosts from particular plant groups.
Morikawi et al. (2003) detected four molecular subgroups within
the species as they defined it, using ITS1 data. The primary
branch separated strains from monocotyledonous (monocot) and
dicotyledonous (dicot) plant hosts. The dicot clade did not show any
clear host-linked substructure, but the monocot clade contained
three subclades with one restricted to Orchidaceae and the other
two containing strains from Crinum (Amaryllidaceae). The dicot
clade corresponds to C. karstii as recognised in this paper, while
the monocot clade contains C. boninense s. str. Our research does
not support this split. While occuring on a wide range of dicots,
C. karstii was also described on Orchidaceae and occurs on other
monocots as well, especially Musa spp. Of the other segregate
species that we recognise, C. dracaenae and C. hippeastri seem
to be specific at host genus level, although the number of strains
that we have examined is insufficient to confirm these indications.
A feature of many strains of the C. boninense aggregate is the
production of a teleomorph. The Glomerella morphs of Colletotrichum
have been inadequately studied in comparison to the anamorphs. Von
Arx & Müller (1954) carried out a global revision using morphological
characters and Uecker (1994) completed an ontogenetic study of one
C. gloeosporioides isolate. We know that at least some strains of most
of the principal species aggregates can undergo meiosis, including
the C. acutatum group (Guerber & Correll 2001, Guerber et al. 2003,
Marcelino et al. 2008), the C. destructivum group (Armstrong-Cho &
Banniza 2006, linked to an anamorph misidentified as C. truncatum),
the C. orbiculare group (Rodriguez-Guerra et al. 2005) and the C.
graminicola group (Crouch et al. 2009).
The Glomerella morphs of Colletotrichum species are
morphologically uniform, with ascospore size and shape the only
feature that has been credited with any diagnostic value. There
is much overlap in published dimensions and it is not practical to
distinguish sexual structures of the C. boninense aggregate from
those of the other groups using morphological methods alone.
Lu et al. (2004) observed high genetic variability among
Colletotrichum strains, including some from the C. boninense
complex, from trees in the Iwokrama Forest Reserve in Guyana
by means of ISSR-PCR, RAPD PCR and ITS rDNA sequencing.
Almost no two strains were genetically identical, and this variability
was postulated to be due to meiosis. Comparing about 80 isolates
from different tree species in the same area, they also did not
detect host specificity, neither at species nor population level.
Those cultures were not available to us, but some of their ITS
sequences diverge from those of the main body of the C. boninense
species complex and may represent further segregate taxa.
The relationship between endophytic and pathogenic isolates of
Colletotrichum needs more research, as some endophytes may be
latent pathogens (Lu et al. 2004), while others appear exclusively
endophytic (Rojas et al. 2010). In both studies, endophytes did not
appear to be strongly host-specific. Most of the species in our study
of the C. boninense species complex are known only from a few
isolates, either from a single host genus or from more than one host
genus and then with a limited distribution. However, two species
were represented by many isolates, C. karstii and C. boninense, of
which C. karstii has the widest host range and distribution. Almost
all strains that were isolated as endophytes belong to C. karstii,
although that species also includes strains derived from diseased
plant tissues. More research is needed into the life strategies and
host-parasite relations of the fungi belonging to this clade.
Detailed study of the C. boninense complex has demonstrated
that even recently recognised species of Colletotrichum may mask
extensive variation at the molecular level, and can contain multiple
taxa with distinct evolutionary origins. The arguments as to whether
these segregate taxa should be recognised at species or infraspecific
level (Cannon et al. 2008) have still not been laid to rest, but recent
trends are to consider them as independent species. This has the
benefit of simplicity when referring to them, but in many cases the
name does not infer host specificity or nutritional/biological strategy
and is thus of limited practical value to the applied mycologist and
plant pathologist. Unfortunately, many of these species cannot be
reliably identified at this time using single diagnostic (barcoding)
sequences, and this aspect of their systematics must obtain a high
priority for the future. On a positive note, we now have substantially
more information about the C. boninense complex in terms of its
phylogenetic constituents.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the curators of the CABI, CBS and ICMP culture collections as well as
Prof. dr Lilliana M. Hoyos-Carvajal, Faculty Agronomy, Plant Health Laboratory,
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá-Colombia, Dr G.C. Carroll, University
of Oregon, U.S.A. and Dr N.S. Massola, ESALQ, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil
for experimental strains. The curator of the fungarium at the Royal Botanic Gardens
provided access to historical type specimens. This research was supported by the
Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality through an endowment
of the FES programme “Versterking infrastructuur Plantgezondheid” (Damm), by
AGMARDT (The Agricultural and Marketing Research and Development Trust)
(Weir), and by the New Zealand Ministry of Science and Innovation through backbone
funding of the “Defining New Zealand’s Land Biota” programme (Johnston).
REFERENCES
Afanador-Kafuri L, Minz D, Maymon M, Freeman S (2003). Characterization of
Colletotrichum isolates from tamarillo, passiflora, and mango in Colombia and
identification of a unique species from the genus. Phytopathology 93: 579–587.
Allescher A (1902). Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen-Flora. Pilze - Fungi Imperfecti vol.
1(7): 385–704. Edn 2.
Armstrong-Cho CL, Banniza S (2006). Glomerella truncata sp. nov., the teleomorph
of Colletotrichum truncatum. Mycological Research 110: 951–956.
Arx JA von (1957). Die Arten der Gattung Colletotrichum Cda. Phytopathologische
Zeitschrift 29: 413–468.
Arx JA von (1970). A revision of the fungi classified as Gloeosporium. Bibliotheca
Mycologica 24: 1–203.
Arx JA von, Müller E (1954). Die Gattungen der amerosporen Pyrenomyceten.
Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 11 (1): 1–434.
Cannon PF, Buddie AG, Bridge PD (2008). The typification of Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides. Mycotaxon 104: 189–204.
Cannon PF, Damm U, Johnston PR, Weir BS (2012). Colletotrichum – current status
and future directions. Studies in Mycology 73: 181–213.
Carbone I, Kohn LM (1999). A method for designing primer sets for speciation
studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91: 553–556.
Crouch JA, Clarke BB, White JW, Hillman BI (2009). Systematic analysis of the
falcate-spored graminicolous Colletotrichum and a description of six new
species of the fungus from warm-season grasses. Mycologia 101: 717–732.
Crous PW, Gams W, Stalpers JA, Robert V, Stegehuis G (2004a). MycoBank: an
online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Studies in Mycology
50: 19–22.
Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Risede JM, Hywel-Jones NL (2004b). Calonectria species
and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: species with sphaeropedunculate
vesicles. Studies in Mycology 50: 415–430.
34