FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Evaluation of current evidence indicatesthat the health benefits ofnewborn male circumcision outweighthe risks, and the benefitsof newborn male circumcision justifyaccess to this procedure forthose families who choose it. Parents are entitled to factuallycorrect, nonbiased information aboutcircumcision that should be providedbefore conception and early in pregnancy,when parents are most likelyto be weighing the option of circumcisionof a male child. Physicians counseling familiesabout elective male circumcisionshould assist parents by explaining,in a nonbiased manner, the potentialbenefits and risks and by ensuringthat they understand theelective nature of the procedure. Parents should weigh the healthbenefits and risks in light of theirown religious, cultural, and personalpreferences, as the medicalbenefits alone may not outweighthese other considerations for individualfamilies. Parents of newborn boys should beinstructed in the care of the penis,regardless of whether the newbornhas been circumcised or not. Elective circumcision should beperformed only if the infant’s conditionis stable and healthy. Male circumcision should be performedby trained and c<strong>om</strong>petentpractitioners, by using sterile techniquesand effective pain management. Analgesia is s<strong>af</strong>e and effective inreducing the procedural pain associatedwith newborn circumcision;thus, adequate analgesia shouldbe provided whenever newborncircumcision is performed.8Nonpharmacologic techniques(eg, positioning, sucrose pacifiers)alone are insufficient toprevent procedural and postproceduralpain and are notrec<strong>om</strong>mended as the sole methodof analgesia. They should beused only as analgesic adjunctsto improve infant c<strong>om</strong>fort duringcircumcision.8 If used, topical creams may causea higher incidence of skin irritationin low birth weight infants,c<strong>om</strong>pared with infants of normalweight; penile nerve block techniquesshould therefore be chosenfor this group of newborns. Key professional organizations(AAP, the American Academy ofFamily Physicians, the AmericanCollege of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,the American Society ofAnesthesiologists, the AmericanCollege of Nurse Midwives, andother midlevel clinicians such asnurse practitioners) should workcollaboratively to:8 Develop standards of traineeproficiency in the performanceof anesthetic and proceduretechniques, including suturing;8 Teach the procedure and analgesictechniques during postgraduatetraining programs;8 Develop educational materialsfor clinicians to enhance theirownc<strong>om</strong>petencyindiscussingthe benefits and risks of circumcisionwith parents;8 Offer educational materials toassist parents of male infantswith the care of both circumcisedand uncircumcised penises. The preventive and public health benefitsassociated with newborn malecircumcision warrant third-partyreimbursement of the procedure.The American College of Obstetriciansand Gynecologists has endorsed thistechnical report. Pediatrics 2012;130:e756–e785INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUNDStatement of the IssueThe American Academy of Pediatrics’(AAP) statement on circumcision ofthe newborn penis was last issued inMay 1999. 1 The Circumcision PolicyStatement recognized the health benefitsof circumcision but did not deemthe procedure to be a medical necessityfor the well-being of the child. Sincethat time, substantial contributionshave been made to the peer-reviewedliterature concerning circumcision ofmales and its possible benefits. For thisreason, in 2007, the AAP formed a TaskForce charged with reviewing currentevidence on male circumcision andupdating the policy on this procedureto provide guidance to AAP membershipregarding the circumcision ofnewborn males.The American College of Obstetriciansand Gynecologists has endorsed thistechnical report.BackgroundMale circumcision consists of thesurgical removal of s<strong>om</strong>e, or all, of theforeskin (or prepuce) fr<strong>om</strong> the penis. Itis one of the most c<strong>om</strong>mon proceduresin the world. In the United States, theprocedure is most frequently performedduring the newborn period.Elective circumcision performed soon<strong>af</strong>ter the newborn period is generallya result of deferral because of lowbirth weight or illness in the newborn.Circumcision <strong>af</strong>ter the newborn periodis most c<strong>om</strong>monly performed becauseof the infant’s low birth weight or illnessprecluded newborn circumcision.Other infants are circumcisedlater in life because of the occurrenceof tight phimosis and/or urinary tractinfection (UTI).The 3 most c<strong>om</strong>mon operative methodsof circumcision for the newbornmale include: the G<strong>om</strong>co clamp, thePlastibell device, and the Mogen clamp(or variations derived fr<strong>om</strong> the samePEDIATRICS Volume 130, Number 3, September 2012Downloaded fr<strong>om</strong> pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on June 19, 2013e757
principle on which each of thesedevices is based). The elements thatare c<strong>om</strong>mon to the use of each of thesedevices to acc<strong>om</strong>plish circumcisioninclude the following: estimation of theamount of external skin to be removed;dilation of the preputial orifice so thatthe glans can be visualized to ensurethat the glans itself is normal; bluntlyfreeing the inner preputial epitheliumfr<strong>om</strong> the epithelium of the glans;placing the device (at times a dorsalslit is necessary to do so); leavingthe device in situ long enough to producehemostasis; and removal of theforeskin.The extent of this practice in the UnitedStates has been estimated by variousfederally sponsored national surveys,each of which has its strengths andlimitations; thus, multiple measures ofcircumcision prevalence and incidenceare presented. There are large populationmeasures of male circumcisionin the United States, measuring eitherthe occurrence (ie, incidence) of malecircumcision among newborns or theexistence of the circumcised stateamong representative samples ofmales in the United States at a particularperiod in time (ie, prevalence).The findings of these studies arequalitatively similar and consistentlyestimate the rate of male circumcisionto range fr<strong>om</strong> 42% to 80% amongvarious populations. 2–6A recent Centers for Disease Controland Prevention (CDC) study assessedtrends in the incidence of in-hospitalnewborn male circumcision fr<strong>om</strong> 1999to 2010 using 3 independent sources ofdischarge data on in-patient hospitalizations:the National Center for HealthStatistics’ National Hospital DischargeSurvey (NHDS), the Agency for HealthcareResearch and Quality’s National InpatientSample (NIS), and the SDIHealth’s Charge Data Master (CDM). 2,3These sources were used to estimate theincidence of newborn male circumcisionin the first month of life. Overall fr<strong>om</strong>1999 to 2010, the CDC’s weightedanalysis found that the approximatepercentage of newborn US maleswho were circumcised was approximately59.1% according to the NHDS,57.8% according to the NIS, and 55.8%according to the CDM. The incidence ofnewborn male circumcision decreasedover time in all 3 data sources: fr<strong>om</strong>62.5% in 1999 to 56.9% in 2008according to the NHDS; fr<strong>om</strong> 63.5% in1999 to 56.3% in 2008 according tothe NIS; and fr<strong>om</strong> 58.4% in 2001 to54.7% in 2010 according to the CDM(Fig 1). A key limitation is that theseincidence rates were derived fr<strong>om</strong>hospital-based surveys and do not includeout-of-hospital circumcisions;thus, these data sources underestimatethe actual rate of newbornmale circumcision in the first monthof life.NISThe NIS is a database of 5 to 8 millionhospital inpatient stays drawn fr<strong>om</strong>states that participate in the HealthcareCost and Utilization Project(HCUP). In 2008, these states c<strong>om</strong>prised95% of the US population. TheNIS is used to track and analyze nationaltrends in health care utilization,delivery, and outc<strong>om</strong>es via a 20%stratified sample of 1000 c<strong>om</strong>munityhospitals. Weights are provided tocalculate national estimates. 4The NIS indicates that circumcisionwas performed in 57% of male newbornhospitalizations between 1998and 2005. NIS data fr<strong>om</strong> 1988 to 2008indicate that the rate of circumcisionperformed during newborn male deliveryhospitalizations increased significantlyfr<strong>om</strong> 48% in 1988–1991, to61% in 1997–2000, 5 then declined fr<strong>om</strong>61% to 56% in 2000–2008 6 (Fig 1).Circumcision rates were highest in theMidwestern states (74%), followed bythe Northeastern (67%) and Southernstates (61%). The lowest circumcisionrates were found in the Westernstates (30%) (Table 1). 3NHANESThe NHANES provides a snapshot of thehealth and nutritional status of the USpopulation aged 14 to 59 years at thetime of the survey, by using a probabilitysample of persons aged 0 toover 60 years. Prevalence of male circumcisionis derived fr<strong>om</strong> participantself-report and is thus subject t<strong>om</strong>isclassification. Fr<strong>om</strong> 1999 to 2004,NHANES found that, of the 6174 mensurveyed, 79% of men reported beingcircumcised, including 88% ofnon-Hispanic white men, 73% of non-Hispanic black men, 42% of Mexican-American men, and 50% of men ofother races/ethnicities 6 (Fig 2).However, prevalence rates are limitedby the accuracy of the examiner and/orthe self-report. 7,8 These findings underscorethe necessity of using astandardized clinical examination forestablishing circumcision status forthe purpose of research on circumcision.It also highlights the potentialdifficulty of advising on care of thecircumcised and uncircumcised peniswhen an individual and/or clinicianmay not know which condition ispresent.Ethical IssuesThe practice of medicine has longrespected an adult’s right to selfdeterminationin health care decisionmaking.This principle has beenoperationalized through the doctrineof informed consent. The process ofinformed consent obligates the clinicianto explain any procedure ortreatment and to enumerate the risks,benefits, and alternatives so the patientcan make an informed choice. Asa general rule, minors in the UnitedStates are not considered c<strong>om</strong>petentto provide legally binding consent regardingtheir health care, and parentse758FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICSDownloaded fr<strong>om</strong> pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on June 19, 2013
- Page 1 and 2: OMSKÆRINGAF DRENGENotat2013
- Page 3 and 4: Indhold1 Sundhedsstyrelsens sammenf
- Page 5 and 6: 1 Sundhedsstyrelsens sammenfatningO
- Page 7 and 8: døgn under indlæggelse på sygehu
- Page 9 and 10: arnet ligger på en pude på et bor
- Page 11 and 12: se områder i Afrika. WHO understre
- Page 13 and 14: 3 Omskæring i DanmarkFor en del å
- Page 15 and 16: Hvis en person, der hverken er læg
- Page 17 and 18: 4 Omskæring i andre landEfter Sund
- Page 19 and 20: sundhedsmæssige fordele ikke er tu
- Page 21: 6 Bilagsfortegnelse:Bilag 1:Sundhed
- Page 24 and 25: WHITEPAPER- OM RITUEL OMSKÆRELSE A
- Page 26 and 27: OM RITUEL JØDISK OMSKÆRELSE AF DR
- Page 29 and 30: White Paper om religiøs omskærels
- Page 31 and 32: har været oppe med jævne mellemru
- Page 33 and 34: To tredjedel færre infektioner på
- Page 35 and 36: Der er en betydelig risiko for, at
- Page 37 and 38: 2.3 Beskrivelse af afrapporteringen
- Page 39 and 40: 3.5 Betydningen for den jødiske fa
- Page 41 and 42: af medicinske årsager, hvoraf alvo
- Page 43 and 44: lodtrækning fik foretaget omskære
- Page 45 and 46: Endvidere skal lægen i fornødent
- Page 47 and 48: Stritøreoperationer udføres både
- Page 49 and 50: Den foreliggende medicinske forskni
- Page 51: TECHNICAL REPORTMale Circumcisionab
- Page 55 and 56: FIGURE 2Prevalence of male circumci
- Page 57 and 58: TABLE 2 Results from Medline, Cochr
- Page 59 and 60: Male Circumcision and Diseases,Morb
- Page 61 and 62: een diagnosed with genital herpes a
- Page 63 and 64: Results data indicate that the inci
- Page 65 and 66: participants’ ages and any coexis
- Page 67 and 68: without general anesthesia in boys
- Page 69 and 70: was reported in 2.2% of cases andin
- Page 71 and 72: nurse practitioners) should workcol
- Page 73 and 74: circumcision practices in theUnited
- Page 75 and 76: at: www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/facts
- Page 77 and 78: childhood: a meta-analysis. Pediatr
- Page 79 and 80: multicenter survey. Isr Med Assoc J
- Page 81 and 82: Male CircumcisionTASK FORCE ON CIRC
- Page 83 and 84: The online version of this article,
- Page 85 and 86: COMMENTARYIn this commentary, a dif
- Page 87 and 88: COMMENTARYThe cardinal medical ques
- Page 89 and 90: Cultural Bias in the AAP's 2012 Tec
- Page 91 and 92: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 93 and 94: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 95 and 96: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 97 and 98: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 99 and 100: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 101 and 102: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 103 and 104:
2013-06-21 Dnr x.x-xxxxx/xxxx 1(4)T
- Page 105 and 106:
SOCIALSTYRELSEN 2013-06-21 Dnr 3(4)