FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICSparents c<strong>om</strong>plete would assist in thedecision of whether to circumcise ornot. To this end, the Task Force rec<strong>om</strong>mendsthat key professionalorganizations (AAP, ACOG, AAFP, AmericanSociety of Anesthesiologists,American College of Nurse Midwives,and other entities supporting midlevelclinicians) work together to developa consensus plan about which groupsare best suited to perform circumcisionsin newborn males; teach theprocedure and analgesic techniquesduring postgraduate training programs;and develop standards oftrainee proficiency. In addition, healthdepartments should be involved in thedissemination of educational materialsand coordinating educational effortswith professional organizations.Financing Newborn MaleCircumcision Task Force rec<strong>om</strong>mendation:1. The preventive and publichealth benefits associated withnewborn male circumcisionwarrant third-party reimbursementof the procedure.The CDC estimates that, fr<strong>om</strong> 2005 to2006, the average cost of providingnewborn male circumcision (includingphysician- and facility-related costs)ranged fr<strong>om</strong> $216 to $601 across thenation. 60 Hospitals in states whereMedicaid covers routine newbornmale circumcision have circumcisionrates that are 24% higher than hospitalsin states without such coverage.23 As of 2009, 15 states did notcover newborn male circumcision intheir Medicaid programs; 2 additionalstates had variable coverage dependenton the enrollment plan. 245There seems to be a relationship betweencircumcision incidence andthird-party payment.Circumcised newborns are more likelyto be privately insured than publiclyinsured infants. 246 The weighted ratesof circumcision over the 13-year periodfr<strong>om</strong> 1991 to 2005 were 40.8% forMedicaid clients versus 43.3% for theuninsured and 64.4% for insurednewborns. 5 The associations with insurancestatus were independent ofrace/ethnicity and socioecon<strong>om</strong>icstatus in this study. 246As noted, a recent cost-effectivenessanalysis by the CDC concluded thatnewborn circumcision is a societalcost-saving HIV prevention intervention.60 African-American and Hispanicmales in the United States aredisproportionately <strong>af</strong>fected by HIVand other STIs, and thus would derivethe greatest benefit fr<strong>om</strong> circumcision;the HIV prevention evidencefor non-Hispanic white males was notas strong as for African-American andHispanic males. However, the African-American and Hispanic populationsare the most likely to have Medicaidcoverage. 247 In 2010, 50% of Hispanicchildren (up to age 18 years) and 54%of African-American children werecovered by Medicaid, c<strong>om</strong>pared with23% of white children. 248 Thus, recentefforts by state Medicaid programs tocurb payment for newborn male circumcision<strong>af</strong>fect those populations thatcould benefit the most fr<strong>om</strong> the procedure.60 The CDC authors rec<strong>om</strong>mendedthat: “Financial barriers thatprevent parents fr<strong>om</strong> having the choiceto circumcise their male newbornsshould be reduced or eliminated.”AREAS FOR FUTURE RESEARCHIn the course of its work, the TaskForce identified important gaps in ourknowledge of male circumcision andurges the research c<strong>om</strong>munity to seriouslyconsider these gaps as futureresearch agendas are developed. Althoughit is clear that there is goodevidence on the risks and benefits ofmale circumcision, it will be useful forthis benefit to be more precisely definedin a US setting and to monitoradverse events. Specifically, the TaskForce rec<strong>om</strong>mends additional studiesto better understand: The performance of elective malecircumcisions in the United States,including those that are hospitalbasedand nonhospital-based, ininfancy and subsequently in life. Parental decision-making to developuseful tools for c<strong>om</strong>munication betweenproviders and parents on theissueofmalecircumcision. The impact of male circumcision ontransmission of HIV and other STIs inthe United States because key studiesto date have been performed inAfrican populations with HIV burdensthat are epidemiologically differentfr<strong>om</strong> HIV in the United States. The risk of acquisition of HIV andother STIs in 0- to 18-year-olds, tohelp inform the acceptance of theprocedure during infancy versusdeferring the decision to performcircumcision (and thus the procedure’sbenefits) until the child canprovide his own assent/consent.Because newborn male circumcisionis less expensive and morewidely available, a delay often meansthat circumcision does not occur. Itwill be useful to more precisely definethe prevention benefits conferredby male circumcision toinform parental decision-makingand to evaluate cost-effectivenessand benefits of circumcision, especiallyin terms of numbers needed totreat to prevent specific outc<strong>om</strong>es. The population-based incidence ofc<strong>om</strong>plications of newborn malecircumcision (including stratificationsaccording to timing of procedure,type of procedure, providertype, setting, and timing of c<strong>om</strong>plications[especially severe and nonacutec<strong>om</strong>plications]). The impact of the AAP Male Circumcisionpolicy on newborn malePEDIATRICS Volume 130, Number 3, September 2012Downloaded fr<strong>om</strong> pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on June 19, 2013e777
circumcision practices in theUnited States and elsewhere. The extent and level of training of theworkforce to sustain the availabilityof s<strong>af</strong>e circumcision practices fornewborn males and their families.CONCLUSIONSThis technical report provides rec<strong>om</strong>mendationsregarding the practiceof male circumcision, particularly inthe newborn period. It emphasizes theprimacy of parental decision-makingand the imperative for those whoperform male circumcisions to beadequately trained and use both effectivesterile techniques and painmanagement. The report evaluatedcurrent evidence regarding the effectof male circumcision on the preventionof STIs (including HIV), UTIs, cancer, andother morbidities. Evidence about c<strong>om</strong>plicationsresulting fr<strong>om</strong> male circumcisionand the use of analgesiaand anesthesia were also discussed.The Task Force concluded that thehealth benefits of newborn male circumcisionoutweigh the risks andjustify access to this procedure forfamilies who choose it.The Task Force also made the followingrec<strong>om</strong>mendations: Evaluation of current evidence indicatesthat the health benefits ofnewborn male circumcision outweighthe risks, and the benefitsof newborn male circumcision justifyaccess to this procedure forthose families who choose it. Parents are entitled to factually correct,nonbiased information aboutcircumcision that should be providedbefore conception and earlyin pregnancy, when parents aremost likely to be weighing the optionof circumcision of a male child. Physicians counseling families aboutelective male circumcision shouldassist parents by explaining, ina nonbiased manner, the potentialbenefits and risks, and by ensuringthat they understand the electivenature of the procedure. Parents should weigh the healthbenefits and risks in light of theirown religious, cultural, and personalpreferences, as the medicalbenefits alone may not outweighthese other considerations for individualfamilies. Parents of newborn boys should beinstructed in the care of the penisat the time of discharge fr<strong>om</strong> thenewborn hospital stay, whether thenewborn is circumcised or not. Elective circumcision should beperformed only if the infant’s conditionis stable and healthy. Trained and c<strong>om</strong>petent practitioners,by using sterile techniquesand effective pain management,should perform male circumcision. Analgesia is s<strong>af</strong>e and effective inreducing the procedural painassociated with newborn circumcision;thus, adequate analgesiashould be provided whenevernewborn circumcision is performed.8Nonpharmacologic techniques(such as positioning and sucrosepacifiers) alone are insufficientto prevent proceduraland postprocedural pain andare not rec<strong>om</strong>mended as thesole method of analgesia. Theyshould be used only as analgesicadjuncts to improve infantc<strong>om</strong>fort during circumcision.8 If used, topical creams maycause a higher incidence of skinirritation in low birth weight infants,c<strong>om</strong>pared with infants ofnormal weight, so penile nerveblock techniques should be chosenfor this group of newborns. Key professional organizations (AAP,AAFP, ACOG, the American Societyof Anesthesiologists, the AmericanCollege of Nurse Midwives, and othermidlevel clinicians such as nursepractitioners) should work collaborativelyto:8 Develop standards of traineeproficiency in performance ofanesthetic and procedure techniques,including suturing;8 Teach the procedure and analgesictechniques during postgraduatetraining programs;8 Develop educational materialsfor clinicians to enhance practitioners’c<strong>om</strong>petency in discussingthe benefits and risks ofcircumcision with parents;8 Offer educational materials to assistparents of male infants withthe care of both circumcised anduncircumcised penises. The preventive and public healthbenefits associated with newbornmale circumcision warrant thirdpartyreimbursement of the procedure.TASK FORCE ON CIRCUMCISIONSusan Blank, MD, MPH, ChairpersonMichael Brady, MD, Representing the C<strong>om</strong>mitteeon Pediatric AIDSEllen Buerk, MD, Representing the AAP Board ofDirectorsWaldemar Carlo, MD, Representing the AAPC<strong>om</strong>mittee on Fetus and NewbornDouglas Diekema, MD, MPH, Representing theAAP C<strong>om</strong>mittee on BioethicsAndrew Freedman, MD, Representing the AAPSection on UrologyLynne Maxwell, MD, Representing the AAP Sectionon Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineSteven Wegner, MD, JD, Representing the AAPC<strong>om</strong>mittee on Child Health FinancingLIAISONSCharles LeBaron, MD – Centers for DiseaseControl and PreventionLesley Atwood, MD – American Academy ofFamily PhysiciansSabrina Craigo, MD – American College ofObstetricians and GynecologistsCONSULTANTSSusan K. Flinn, MA – Medical WriterEsther C. Janowsky, MD, PhDSTAFFEdward P. Zimmerman, MSe778FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICSDownloaded fr<strong>om</strong> pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on June 19, 2013
- Page 1 and 2:
OMSKÆRINGAF DRENGENotat2013
- Page 3 and 4:
Indhold1 Sundhedsstyrelsens sammenf
- Page 5 and 6:
1 Sundhedsstyrelsens sammenfatningO
- Page 7 and 8:
døgn under indlæggelse på sygehu
- Page 9 and 10:
arnet ligger på en pude på et bor
- Page 11 and 12:
se områder i Afrika. WHO understre
- Page 13 and 14:
3 Omskæring i DanmarkFor en del å
- Page 15 and 16:
Hvis en person, der hverken er læg
- Page 17 and 18:
4 Omskæring i andre landEfter Sund
- Page 19 and 20:
sundhedsmæssige fordele ikke er tu
- Page 21: 6 Bilagsfortegnelse:Bilag 1:Sundhed
- Page 24 and 25: WHITEPAPER- OM RITUEL OMSKÆRELSE A
- Page 26 and 27: OM RITUEL JØDISK OMSKÆRELSE AF DR
- Page 29 and 30: White Paper om religiøs omskærels
- Page 31 and 32: har været oppe med jævne mellemru
- Page 33 and 34: To tredjedel færre infektioner på
- Page 35 and 36: Der er en betydelig risiko for, at
- Page 37 and 38: 2.3 Beskrivelse af afrapporteringen
- Page 39 and 40: 3.5 Betydningen for den jødiske fa
- Page 41 and 42: af medicinske årsager, hvoraf alvo
- Page 43 and 44: lodtrækning fik foretaget omskære
- Page 45 and 46: Endvidere skal lægen i fornødent
- Page 47 and 48: Stritøreoperationer udføres både
- Page 49 and 50: Den foreliggende medicinske forskni
- Page 51 and 52: TECHNICAL REPORTMale Circumcisionab
- Page 53 and 54: principle on which each of thesedev
- Page 55 and 56: FIGURE 2Prevalence of male circumci
- Page 57 and 58: TABLE 2 Results from Medline, Cochr
- Page 59 and 60: Male Circumcision and Diseases,Morb
- Page 61 and 62: een diagnosed with genital herpes a
- Page 63 and 64: Results data indicate that the inci
- Page 65 and 66: participants’ ages and any coexis
- Page 67 and 68: without general anesthesia in boys
- Page 69 and 70: was reported in 2.2% of cases andin
- Page 71: nurse practitioners) should workcol
- Page 75 and 76: at: www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/facts
- Page 77 and 78: childhood: a meta-analysis. Pediatr
- Page 79 and 80: multicenter survey. Isr Med Assoc J
- Page 81 and 82: Male CircumcisionTASK FORCE ON CIRC
- Page 83 and 84: The online version of this article,
- Page 85 and 86: COMMENTARYIn this commentary, a dif
- Page 87 and 88: COMMENTARYThe cardinal medical ques
- Page 89 and 90: Cultural Bias in the AAP's 2012 Tec
- Page 91 and 92: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 93 and 94: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 95 and 96: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 97 and 98: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 99 and 100: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 101 and 102: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 103 and 104: 2013-06-21 Dnr x.x-xxxxx/xxxx 1(4)T
- Page 105 and 106: SOCIALSTYRELSEN 2013-06-21 Dnr 3(4)