FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICSinfrequent and include only eitherminor skin reactions (ie, erythema,swelling) or, more rarely, blistering(especially in low birth weight infants).154 For this reason, penilenerve block techniques should bechosen for low birth weight infants.There is good and fair evidence thatboth reactions are less c<strong>om</strong>monwith 4% lidocaine than with lidocaineprilocainecream. 142,150,153–155There is a theoretical risk of methemoglobinemiawith lidocaine-prilocaine. 152However, when methemoglobin has beenmeasured <strong>af</strong>ter lidocaine-prilocaineapplication, the level, although elevated,was not clinically significant. 150Nevertheless, there have been isolatedcase reports of clinically significantmethemoglobinemia involving prolongedapplication time or use in prematureinfants. 156,157,158DPNBMost c<strong>om</strong>monly, DPNB consists ofinjections of 0.4 mL of 1% lidocainewithout epinephrine on both sides ofthe base of the penis. Systemic lidocainelevels obtained with use of thistechnique reached peak concentrationsat 60 minutes <strong>af</strong>ter injectionand were well below toxic ranges. 159There is good evidence that DPNB iseffective in reducing the behavioraland physiologic indicators of paincaused by circumcision, regardless ofthe device used. 144 There is good evidencethat DPNB is superior tolidocaine-prilocaine in relieving painduring and <strong>af</strong>ter circumcision innewborns. 142,160–162 One good-qualityprospective cohort study of 491 newborncircumcisions measured c<strong>om</strong>plicationsof DPNB analgesia; itreported an 11% incidence of bruisingand a 0.2% incidence of hemat<strong>om</strong>a,none of which required any change inmanagement. 163 Another good-quality,blinded, rand<strong>om</strong>ized controlled trialfound a 43% incidence of smallhemat<strong>om</strong>as in preterm and term newbornscircumcised by using DPNB. 142Subcutaneous Ring BlockTwo studies with fair evidence foundthat the subcutaneous circumferentialring block (0.8 mL of 1% lidocainewithout epinephrine injected at thebase or midsh<strong>af</strong>t of the penis) is effectivein mitigating pain and its consequencesduring circumcision ofnewborns. 164One study presented fair evidence thatthe ring block was superior to usingno anesthesia but found a 5% failurerate with the technique (1 in 20 ringblock infants had heart rate and behavioralpain scores that were abovethe control mean during at least 50%of the measured intervals, while 19 of20 had heart rate and pain scoresless than the control mean). Therewere no hemat<strong>om</strong>as in the infantsreceiving ring blocks. A second ringblock study had fair evidence that themethod was superior to either DPNBor lidocaine-prilocaine cream for painrelief in newborn circumcision, as thering block seemed to prevent cryingand increases in heart rate during allphases of the circumcision, with lesscrying and lower heart rates duringforeskin separation and incision thanseen with DPNB or lidocaine-prilocaine.152 No c<strong>om</strong>plications have beenreported in the use of this simple andhighly effective technique.Analgesia and Anesthesia fora Circumcision After the NewbornPeriodIn the United States, <strong>af</strong>ter the newbornperiod, general anesthesia is usedduring male circumcision because thesurgical procedure takes longer andinvolves hemostasis and the suturingof skin edges. Use of adjuvant localanesthetic techniques in addition togeneral anesthesia provides longerlastingpostoperative analgesia, minimizesthe need for intraoperative orpostoperative opioid administration,reduces adverse postoperative eventssuch as nausea and v<strong>om</strong>iting, anddecreases recovery time. Long-lastinganalgesia is achieved with either penilenerve block, by using any of themethods mentioned earlier, or caudalepidural analgesia in infants andchildren up to 3 years of age.General anesthesia carries a low riskof mortality (1 death per 400 000instances of general anesthesia). Therisk of adverse events (especially respiratoryevents) during general anesthesiaremains higher in infantsunder 1 year of age. 165 These risks areminimized when the procedure isperformed in infants in their optimalstate of health (no active reactiveairway disease or upper respiratoryinfection) and in a facility familiarwith the anesthesia care of infants. 166Additional concerns associated withsurgical circumcision in older infantsinclude time lost by parents andpatients fr<strong>om</strong> work and/or school.Caudal BlockCaudal block (CB) with bupivacaine isan anesthetic technique used forpostoperative analgesia for circumcisionin infants and older children up to3 years of age, as an alternative to ringblock and DPNB techniques. There isgood and fair evidence that there isa longer time to first postoperativeurination <strong>af</strong>ter CB without adverseclinical consequences. 167,168 There isgood evidence for a high incidence ofmild postoperative motor block anddelay in walking <strong>af</strong>ter the CB procedure(21% to 44%) in older children.167,169,170 Caudal analgesia maybe less available in facilities that donot treat many pediatric patients.DPNBThe reported failure rate of DPNB is1% to 10%. 171–175 When DPNB is usedPEDIATRICS Volume 130, Number 3, September 2012Downloaded fr<strong>om</strong> pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on June 19, 2013e771
without general anesthesia in boys 3to 5 years of age, the technique hasa failure rate of 15%; for boys aged 6and older, the failure rate is 1.5%. 175There is good and fair evidence thatincidence of hemat<strong>om</strong>a with DPNBranges fr<strong>om</strong> 0.001% to 24%; severalstudies report rates of approximately6%. 174–177 One study with fair evidencereports a 0.001% rate of “improperneedle position with bleeding” anda similar number of “medicationerrors.” 176 Studies with good and fairevidence report a 12% to 83% rate ofedema in the area of injection of thelocal anesthetic <strong>af</strong>ter DPNB. 174,175,177Subcutaneous Ring BlockThere is good evidence for thereported 8% failure rate using the ringblock. 168 In children, edema and distortionof tissue layers <strong>af</strong>ter the ringblock make surgery more difficult,c<strong>om</strong>pared with using a CB to preventpostoperative pain. 178C<strong>om</strong>parison of MethodsDPNB, subcutaneous ring block, andCB techniques may be used in conjunctionwith general anesthesiadepending on the age of the childand are also used to provide postcircumcisionanalgesia. There is goodevidence that there is no difference inthe quality of postoperative analgesiaor parent satisfaction between DPNBand CB using bupivacaine. 169 A c<strong>om</strong>parisonof CB with or without a subcutaneousring block with bupivacaineshowed good evidence that CB witha subcutaneous ring block had significantlylonger duration of postoperativeanalgesia. 168 A techniquedescribing ultrasound guidance forcorrect needle placement for DPNB inchildren under general anesthesiadescribes lower pain scores in thefirst postoperative hour and a longerinterval until rescue analgesia wasrequired. 179,180C<strong>om</strong>plications and Adverse Events Task Force Rec<strong>om</strong>mendation:8 Elective circumcision should beperformed only if the infant’scondition is stable and healthy.8 Male circumcision should beperformed by trained and c<strong>om</strong>petentpractitioners, by usingsterile techniques and effectivepain management.The true incidence of c<strong>om</strong>plications<strong>af</strong>ter newborn circumcision is unknown,in part due to differing definitionsof “c<strong>om</strong>plication” and differingstandards for determining the timingof when a c<strong>om</strong>plication has occurred(ie, early or late). Adding to the confusionis the c<strong>om</strong>ingling of “early”c<strong>om</strong>plications, such as bleeding orinfection, with “late” c<strong>om</strong>plications suchas adhesions and meatal stenosis. Also,c<strong>om</strong>plication rates <strong>af</strong>ter an in-hospitalprocedure with trained personnel maybe far different fr<strong>om</strong> those of the developingworld and/or by untrainedritual providers. For the purposesof this document, c<strong>om</strong>plications aregrouped in terms of the timing of theprocedure. (Citations for the followingstatements below are provided in thesection <strong>af</strong>ter this summary.)Significant acute c<strong>om</strong>plications arerare, occurring in approximately 1 in500 newborn male circumcisions.Acute c<strong>om</strong>plications are usually minorand most c<strong>om</strong>monly involve bleeding,infection, or an imperfect amount oftissue removed. Late c<strong>om</strong>plications dooccur, most c<strong>om</strong>monly adhesions, skinbridges, and meatal stenosis. Thereare 2 schools of thought regardingthe cause of penile adhesions, whichare c<strong>om</strong>mon <strong>af</strong>ter circumcision. Oneis that fine adhesions represent inc<strong>om</strong>pletelysis of physiologic adhesionsat the time of circumcision; theother is that the fine adhesions occurbecause of raw serosa surfaces.It is unknown how often these latec<strong>om</strong>plications require surgical repair;this area requires further study.In general, the specific technique useddoes not <strong>af</strong>ford a significant differencein risk of c<strong>om</strong>plications. However, boysundergoing circumcisions in medicalfacilities in industrialized settingsperformed by trained practitionershave fewer c<strong>om</strong>plications than boys innonindustrialized nations who havecircumcisions performed by poorlytrained (or untrained) practitioners innonmedical surroundings. If circumcisionis performed, it is imperativethat those providing the service haveadequate training in the method usedand resources for and practice ofadequate analgesia and infectioncontrol.Contraindications to newborn circumcisioninclude significantly prematureinfants, those with blood dyscrasias,individuals who have a family history ofbleeding disorders, and those who havecongenital abnormalities such as hypospadias,congenital chordee, or deficientsh<strong>af</strong>t skin such as penoscrotalfusion or congenital buried penis. Inaddition, before performing newbornmale circumcision, the clinician shouldconfirm that vitamin K has been administered,in accordance with standardpractice of newborn care. 181Newborn Elective CircumcisionTwo large US hospital-based studieswith good evidence estimate the risk ofsignificant acute circumcision c<strong>om</strong>plicationsin the United States to bebetween 0.19% and 0.22%. 121,123Bleeding was the most c<strong>om</strong>monc<strong>om</strong>plication (0.08% to 0.18%), followedby infection (0.06%) and penileinjury (0.04%). For c<strong>om</strong>parison, anaudit of 33 921 tonsillect<strong>om</strong>ies foundan incidence of hemorrhage of 1.9%among children aged 0 to 4 years. 182An Israeli prospective cohort studywith fair evidence examined 19 478male infants born in 2001 who weree772FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICSDownloaded fr<strong>om</strong> pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on June 19, 2013
- Page 1 and 2:
OMSKÆRINGAF DRENGENotat2013
- Page 3 and 4:
Indhold1 Sundhedsstyrelsens sammenf
- Page 5 and 6:
1 Sundhedsstyrelsens sammenfatningO
- Page 7 and 8:
døgn under indlæggelse på sygehu
- Page 9 and 10:
arnet ligger på en pude på et bor
- Page 11 and 12:
se områder i Afrika. WHO understre
- Page 13 and 14:
3 Omskæring i DanmarkFor en del å
- Page 15 and 16: Hvis en person, der hverken er læg
- Page 17 and 18: 4 Omskæring i andre landEfter Sund
- Page 19 and 20: sundhedsmæssige fordele ikke er tu
- Page 21: 6 Bilagsfortegnelse:Bilag 1:Sundhed
- Page 24 and 25: WHITEPAPER- OM RITUEL OMSKÆRELSE A
- Page 26 and 27: OM RITUEL JØDISK OMSKÆRELSE AF DR
- Page 29 and 30: White Paper om religiøs omskærels
- Page 31 and 32: har været oppe med jævne mellemru
- Page 33 and 34: To tredjedel færre infektioner på
- Page 35 and 36: Der er en betydelig risiko for, at
- Page 37 and 38: 2.3 Beskrivelse af afrapporteringen
- Page 39 and 40: 3.5 Betydningen for den jødiske fa
- Page 41 and 42: af medicinske årsager, hvoraf alvo
- Page 43 and 44: lodtrækning fik foretaget omskære
- Page 45 and 46: Endvidere skal lægen i fornødent
- Page 47 and 48: Stritøreoperationer udføres både
- Page 49 and 50: Den foreliggende medicinske forskni
- Page 51 and 52: TECHNICAL REPORTMale Circumcisionab
- Page 53 and 54: principle on which each of thesedev
- Page 55 and 56: FIGURE 2Prevalence of male circumci
- Page 57 and 58: TABLE 2 Results from Medline, Cochr
- Page 59 and 60: Male Circumcision and Diseases,Morb
- Page 61 and 62: een diagnosed with genital herpes a
- Page 63 and 64: Results data indicate that the inci
- Page 65: participants’ ages and any coexis
- Page 69 and 70: was reported in 2.2% of cases andin
- Page 71 and 72: nurse practitioners) should workcol
- Page 73 and 74: circumcision practices in theUnited
- Page 75 and 76: at: www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/facts
- Page 77 and 78: childhood: a meta-analysis. Pediatr
- Page 79 and 80: multicenter survey. Isr Med Assoc J
- Page 81 and 82: Male CircumcisionTASK FORCE ON CIRC
- Page 83 and 84: The online version of this article,
- Page 85 and 86: COMMENTARYIn this commentary, a dif
- Page 87 and 88: COMMENTARYThe cardinal medical ques
- Page 89 and 90: Cultural Bias in the AAP's 2012 Tec
- Page 91 and 92: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 93 and 94: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 95 and 96: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 97 and 98: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 99 and 100: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 101 and 102: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 103 and 104: 2013-06-21 Dnr x.x-xxxxx/xxxx 1(4)T
- Page 105 and 106: SOCIALSTYRELSEN 2013-06-21 Dnr 3(4)