Cultural Bias in the AAP’s 2012 Technical Reportand Policy Statement on Male CircumcisionabstractThe American Academy of Pediatrics recently released its new TechnicalReport and Policy Statement on male circumcision, concludingthat current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newbornmale circumcision outweigh the risks. The technical report is basedon the scrutiny of a large number of c<strong>om</strong>plex scientific articles.Therefore, while striving for objectivity, the conclusions drawn bythe 8 task force members reflect what these individual physiciansperceived as trustworthy evidence. Seen fr<strong>om</strong> the outside, culturalbias reflecting the normality of nontherapeutic male circumcision inthe United States seems obvious, and the report’s conclusions aredifferent fr<strong>om</strong> those reached by physicians in other parts of theWestern world, including Europe, Canada, and Australia. In thisc<strong>om</strong>mentary, a different view is presented by non–US-based physiciansand representatives of general medical associations and societiesfor pediatrics, pediatric surgery, and pediatric urology inNorthern Europe. To these authors, only 1 of the arguments putforward by the American Academy of Pediatrics has s<strong>om</strong>e theoreticalrelevance in relation to infant male circumcision; namely, thepossible protection against urinary tract infections in infant boys,whichcaneasilybetreatedwithantibiotics without tissue loss. Theother claimed health benefits, including protection against HIV/AIDS,genital herpes, genital warts, and penile cancer, are questionable,weak, and likely to have little public health relevance in a Westerncontext, and they do not represent c<strong>om</strong>pelling reasons for surgerybefore boys are old enough to decide for themselves. Pediatrics2013;131:796–800Circumcision rates are steadily decreasing in most Western countriesaround the world, including the United States. 1 Still, a majority ofnewborn male infants undergo the procedure in the United States. In itsnewly released Technical Report and Policy Statement on male circumcision,2,3 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has changedfr<strong>om</strong> a neutral to a more positive attitude toward circumcision,claiming that possible health benefits now outweigh the risks andpossible negative long-term consequences. The AAP does not rec<strong>om</strong>mendroutine circumcision of all infant boys as a public healthmeasure but asserts that the benefits of the procedure are sufficientto warrant third-party payment. In Europe, Canada, and Australia,where infant male circumcision is considerably less c<strong>om</strong>mon than inthe United States, the AAP report is unlikely to influence circumcisionpractices because the conclusions of the report and policy statementseem to be strongly culturally biased.AUTHORS: Morten Frisch, MD, PhD, a Yves Aigrain, MD,PhD, b Vidmantas Barauskas, MD, PhD, c Ragnar Bjarnason,MD, PhD, d Su-Anna Boddy, MD, e Piotr Czauderna, MD, PhD, fRobert P.E. de Gier, MD, g T<strong>om</strong> P.V.M. de Jong, MD, PhD, hGünter Fasching, MD, i Willem Fetter, MD, PhD, j ManfredGahr, MD, k Christian Graugaard, MD, PhD, l Gorm Greisen,MD, PhD, m Anna Gunnarsdottir, MD, PhD, n WolframHartmann, MD, o Petr Havranek, MD, PhD, p RowenaHitchcock, MD, q Simon Huddart, MD, r St<strong>af</strong>fan Janson, MD,PhD, s Poul Jaszczak, MD, PhD, t Christoph Kupferschmid,MD, u Tuija Lahdes-Vasama, MD, v Harry Lindahl, MD, PhD, wNoni MacDonald, MD, x Trond Markestad, MD, y MatisMärtson, MD, PhD, z Solveig Marianne Nordhov, MD, PhD, aaHeikki Pälve, MD, PhD, bb Aigars Petersons, MD, PhD, ccFeargal Quinn, MD, dd Niels Qvist, MD, PhD, ee ThrainnRosmundsson, MD, ff Harri Saxen, MD, PhD, gg Olle Söder, MD,PhD, hh Maximilian Stehr, MD, PhD, ii Volker C.H. vonLoewenich, MD, jj Johan Wallander, MD, PhD, kk and ReneWijnen, MD, PhD llaDepartment of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut,Copenhagen and Center for Sexology Research, Department ofClinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark;bDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital Necker EnfantsMalades, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; c LithuanianSociety of Paediatric Surgeons, Kaunas, Lithuania; d Departmentof Pediatrics, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland;eChildren’s Surgical Forum of the Royal College of Surgeons ofEngland, London, United Kingd<strong>om</strong>; f Polish Association of PediatricSurgeons, Gdansk, Poland; g Working Group for Pediatric Urology,Dutch Urological Association, Utrecht, Netherlands;hDepartments of Pediatric Urology, University Children’s HospitalsUMC Utrecht and AMC Amsterdam, Netherlands; i Austrian Societyof Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Klagenfurt, Austria;jPaediatric Association of the Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands;kGerman Academy of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine,Berlin, Germany; l Center for Sexology Research, Department ofClinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark;mDepartment of Pediatrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen,Denmark; n Departments of Pediatric Surgery, LandspitaliUniversity Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland, and Karolinska UniversityHospital, Stockholm, Sweden; o German Association ofPediatricians, Cologne, Germany; p Department of PediatricSurgery, Th<strong>om</strong>ayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, CzechRepublic; q British Association of Paediatric Urologists, London,United Kingd<strong>om</strong>;(Continued on last page)796 FRISCH et alDownloaded fr<strong>om</strong> pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on June 19, 2013
COMMENTARYIn this c<strong>om</strong>mentary, a different view ispresented by non–US-based physiciansand representatives of generalmedical associations and societiesfor pediatrics, pediatric surgery,and pediatric urology in NorthernEurope.CRITERIA FOR PREVENTIVEMEDICINEIt is c<strong>om</strong>monly accepted that medicalprocedures always need to be justifiedbecause of their invasive nature andpossible damaging effects. Preventivemedical procedures need more andstricter justification than do therapeuticmedical procedures, as they areaimed at people who are generally freeof medical problems. Even strictercriteria apply for preventive medicalprocedures in children, who cannotweigh the evidence themselves andcannot legally consent to the procedure.4The most important criteria for thejustification of medical proceduresare necessity, cost-effectiveness, subsidiarity,proportionality, and consent.For preventive medical procedures,this means that the procedure musteffectively lead to the prevention ofa serious medical problem, that thereis no less intrusive means of reachingthe same goal, and that the risks ofthe procedure are proportional to theintended benefit. In addition, whenperformed in childhood, it needs to beclearly demonstrated that it is essentialtoperformtheprocedurebeforeanage at which the individual can makea decision about the procedure for himorherself.The AAP technical report points to 4health-related arguments in favor ofcircumcision: the reduced risks ofurinary tract infections (UTIs), penilecancer, s<strong>om</strong>e traditional sexually transmitteddiseases (STDs), and HIV infectionand AIDS.URINARY TRACT INFECTIONSAccording to the literature reviewed,∼1% of boys will develop a UTI withinthe first years of life. 2 There are norand<strong>om</strong>ized controlled trials (RCTs)linking UTIs to circumcision status.The evidence for clinically significantprotection is weak, and with easyaccess to health care, deaths or longtermnegative medical consequencesof UTIs are rare. UTI incidence doesnotseemtobelowerintheUnitedStates, with high circumcision ratesc<strong>om</strong>pared with Europe with low circumcisionrates, and the AAP reportsuggests it will take ∼100 circumcisionstoprevent1caseofUTI.Usingreasonable European estimates citedin the AAP report for the frequency ofsurgical and postoperative c<strong>om</strong>plications(∼2%), for every 100 circumcisions,1 case of UTI may beprevented at the cost of 2 cases ofhemorrhage, infection, or, in rareinstances, more severe outc<strong>om</strong>es oreven death.Circumcision fails to meet the criteriato serve as a preventive measure forUTI, even though this is the only 1 ofthe AAP report’s 4 most favored argumentsthat has any relevance beforethe boy gets old enough to decide forhimself.PENILE CANCERPenile cancer is 1 of the rarest formsof cancer in the Western world (∼1case in 100 000 men per year), almostalways occurring at a later age. Whendiagnosed early, the disease generallyhas a good survival rate. Accordingto the AAP report, 2 between909 and 322 000 circumcisions areneeded to prevent 1 case of penilecancer. Penile cancer is linked to infectionwith human papill<strong>om</strong>aviruses, 5which can be prevented withouttissue loss through cond<strong>om</strong> useand prophylactic vaccination. It isremarkable that incidence rates of penilecancer in the United States, where∼75% of the non-Jewish, non-Muslimmale population is circumcised, 1 aresimilar to rates in northern Europe,where #10% of the male populationis circumcised. 6As a preventive measure for penilecancer, circumcision also fails to meetthe criteria for preventive medicine: theevidence is not strong; the disease israre and has a good survival rate; thereare less intrusive ways of preventingthe disease; and there is no c<strong>om</strong>pellingreason to deny boys their legitimateright to make their own informed decisionwhen they are old enough todo so.TRADITIONAL STDsAccording to the AAP report, 2 there isevidence that circumcision providesprotection against 2 c<strong>om</strong>mon viralSTDs: genital herpes and genital warts.However, the evidence in favor of thisclaim is based primarily on findings inRCTs conducted among adult men insub-Saharan Africa. For other STDs,such as syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia,circumcision offers no convincingprotection. The authors of theAAP report forget to stress that responsibleuse of cond<strong>om</strong>s, regardlessof circumcision status, will provideclose to 100% reduction in risk forany STD. In addition, STDs occur only<strong>af</strong>ter sexual debut, which implies thatthe decision of whether to circumcisecan be postponed to an age whenboys are old enough to decide forthemselves.HIV AND AIDSFr<strong>om</strong> a public health perspective,what seems to be the AAP technicalreport’s most important argument isthat circumcision may reduce the burdenof heterosexually transmitted HIVPEDIATRICS Volume 131, Number 4, April 2013 797Downloaded fr<strong>om</strong> pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on June 19, 2013
- Page 1 and 2:
OMSKÆRINGAF DRENGENotat2013
- Page 3 and 4:
Indhold1 Sundhedsstyrelsens sammenf
- Page 5 and 6:
1 Sundhedsstyrelsens sammenfatningO
- Page 7 and 8:
døgn under indlæggelse på sygehu
- Page 9 and 10:
arnet ligger på en pude på et bor
- Page 11 and 12:
se områder i Afrika. WHO understre
- Page 13 and 14:
3 Omskæring i DanmarkFor en del å
- Page 15 and 16:
Hvis en person, der hverken er læg
- Page 17 and 18:
4 Omskæring i andre landEfter Sund
- Page 19 and 20:
sundhedsmæssige fordele ikke er tu
- Page 21:
6 Bilagsfortegnelse:Bilag 1:Sundhed
- Page 24 and 25:
WHITEPAPER- OM RITUEL OMSKÆRELSE A
- Page 26 and 27:
OM RITUEL JØDISK OMSKÆRELSE AF DR
- Page 29 and 30:
White Paper om religiøs omskærels
- Page 31 and 32:
har været oppe med jævne mellemru
- Page 33 and 34: To tredjedel færre infektioner på
- Page 35 and 36: Der er en betydelig risiko for, at
- Page 37 and 38: 2.3 Beskrivelse af afrapporteringen
- Page 39 and 40: 3.5 Betydningen for den jødiske fa
- Page 41 and 42: af medicinske årsager, hvoraf alvo
- Page 43 and 44: lodtrækning fik foretaget omskære
- Page 45 and 46: Endvidere skal lægen i fornødent
- Page 47 and 48: Stritøreoperationer udføres både
- Page 49 and 50: Den foreliggende medicinske forskni
- Page 51 and 52: TECHNICAL REPORTMale Circumcisionab
- Page 53 and 54: principle on which each of thesedev
- Page 55 and 56: FIGURE 2Prevalence of male circumci
- Page 57 and 58: TABLE 2 Results from Medline, Cochr
- Page 59 and 60: Male Circumcision and Diseases,Morb
- Page 61 and 62: een diagnosed with genital herpes a
- Page 63 and 64: Results data indicate that the inci
- Page 65 and 66: participants’ ages and any coexis
- Page 67 and 68: without general anesthesia in boys
- Page 69 and 70: was reported in 2.2% of cases andin
- Page 71 and 72: nurse practitioners) should workcol
- Page 73 and 74: circumcision practices in theUnited
- Page 75 and 76: at: www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/facts
- Page 77 and 78: childhood: a meta-analysis. Pediatr
- Page 79 and 80: multicenter survey. Isr Med Assoc J
- Page 81 and 82: Male CircumcisionTASK FORCE ON CIRC
- Page 83: The online version of this article,
- Page 87 and 88: COMMENTARYThe cardinal medical ques
- Page 89 and 90: Cultural Bias in the AAP's 2012 Tec
- Page 91 and 92: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 93 and 94: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 95 and 96: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 97 and 98: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 99 and 100: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 101 and 102: Weiss et al. BMC Urology 2010, 10:2
- Page 103 and 104: 2013-06-21 Dnr x.x-xxxxx/xxxx 1(4)T
- Page 105 and 106: SOCIALSTYRELSEN 2013-06-21 Dnr 3(4)