increase knowledge in the region, and focuses on defining the framework for relevant project activities. Therole of the State Provincial Office is highlighted more at the lower level of education than in highereducation.The <strong>Region</strong>al Council of Central <strong>Finland</strong> is a joint municipal authority that works to promote the prosperityof the region. It takes charge of regional development including long-term planning, rapid reactions oncurrent affairs and the creation of a development strategy for Central <strong>Finland</strong>. The regional plan setsguidelines for regional development over the long term (20-30 years). The drafting of this plan, in 2002,involved the participation of state and local government officials, the business sector, establishmentsproviding education and training, a variety of organizations, and individual citizens. The cooperativecommittee of the province of Central <strong>Finland</strong> (MYR) is responsible for the implementation of EUprogrammes in Central <strong>Finland</strong>. MYR combines the regional plan, implementation of special programmesand funding, and reviews the implementation document of the regional plan. It handles supra-provincialprojects and other projects with a special regional importance and / or with a budget exceeding one millioneuros. The committee consists of members representing the <strong>Region</strong>al Council, municipalities, nationalauthorities responsible for the funding of programmes, and labour and industry organizations. Although theHEIs are not participating in the committee, they frequently act as experts for it.Entrepreneurship and its promotion have been prominent topics of social discussion recently. To respond tothe challenges of creating an entrepreneurial atmosphere, several Central Finnish actors started a Y4-entrepreneurship process “Appreciation of Entrepreneurship Up through Cooperation” in 2002. Its objectiveis to develop Central <strong>Finland</strong> to be the most vital province for business in the world by appreciating,motivating and encouraging people to be innovative, work with an entrepreneurial spirit and to beentrepreneurs. The Y4-process has created resources, methods and a way to work. In addition, the JyväskyläPolytechnic and University of Jyväskylä have signed the agreement.Reviewing and evaluating the impact of HEIs on regional developmentThe contribution of HEIs to regional development is not systematically evaluated by the regional authorities.The TE-Centre of Central <strong>Finland</strong> produces information on the local employment of HEI students and this isa frequently used to measure the regional effects of the HEIs. Besides these statistics, the informationgathered by regional opinion and attitude surveys provides information on the regional relevance of HEIs. Itmight be important to consider whether new, more systematic, means of reviewing the HEIs’ impacts onregional development such as an annual evaluation panel or progress report would be needed in the region.7.3 Institutional level: The University of Jyväskylä and Jyväskylä PolytechnicUNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄInstitutional capacity building for regional involvementThe overall strategy of the University of Jyväskylä includes the relationship with the regional community asone of the key challenges it seeks to address. The strategy highlights the role of regional developmentprojects, the contribution to the regional innovation system, the dynamic ability to react to changes in privateor public sector needs, and collaboration between other educational institutions and regional actors.The vice-rector of the university is responsible for promoting regional cooperation and monitoring thedevelopment of innovation activities. To promote the regional collaboration, a new permanent post of seniorcoordinator focusing on the coordination of regional operations, was created in the administration branch in192005 (the post will be filled later on ). Moreover, the temporary posts of project personnel are numerous atthe University of Jyväskylä. The faculties and departments can rather autonomously define the level andprinciples of their regional orientation. The main channels of communication between the regionalstakeholders and the University include networks based on joint project activities, joint strategy work and19 At the moment, due to the national productivity programme the new posts cannot be fulfilled until the national policylines for the future will be settled.101
participation in the decision making process as a member of the board of different bodies. In 2005, the firstexternal members were elected to the University board: they were the Mayor of the City of Jyväskylä and theTechnology Senior Vice President of Metso Paper.Academic leadership is under increasing pressure. The changes in the university system and the growingengagement with societal and regional development require a new kind of strategic leadership. Some of thekey challenges are, for example, finding the balance between centralized and decentralized leadership,introducing business-type leadership characteristics to the university and ensuring the wellbeing of staff inthe competitive labour market. To respond to these challenges the University of Jyväskylä launched theJOPLAA -project in 2002, which aims at making the administrative personnel (of different levels) of theUniversity acquainted with the new challenges and then providing them with the appropriate tools for thedevelopment of quality achievement and personal wellbeing. The main objective is to raise the quality ofleadership in the long-run.From the perspective of ICT infrastructure management, the strategic focal points of the University ofJyväskylä are: to provide high quality services in education, research and societal engagement that promotethe development of individuals’ knowledge base. A primary goal of the ICT infrastructure management is tocreate an overall system with common rules that allows an effective and secure transfer and management ofinformation both within the institution itself and to stakeholders.Human and financial resources management<strong>Region</strong>al responsibilities have been traditionally integrated to the core activities – education and research –of the University of Jyväskylä, but only now is their importance gaining special attention. This explains, atleast partly, the lack of systematic training and rewarding of staff for regional engagement. Although adiverse supply of courses, such as managerial development or project management courses, is organized forthe staff. A challenge of the new performance-based salary system, which will, according to the presentinformation, come into force at the end of the 2005, is how it will take into consideration the regionalactivities of the university staff in encouraging them to pursue regional collaboration.The Management Development Board (JOPLAA) serves as an important part of the personnel policy and thedevelopment of professional management. Acting upon the recommendation of the Science Council, theUniversity Senate took the significant decision in 2004 to initiate a comprehensive research evaluationprogramme, the first of its kind in the University's history. The creation of permanent quality assurancesystems for education and administration are also under preparation.The process of quality assurance for education was conducted at the University of Jyväskylä in 2000-2003and a research evaluation exercise is currently in progress (in 2005-2006). The purpose of the researchevaluation is to enhance the University’s development as an international level research university. Unitsdemonstrating a high level of success in the evaluation may be rewarded, and resources for futuredevelopment may also be allocated to those units.The incentives from national government designed to encourage universities to strengthen their regionallinks are not flattering. Performance-based funds are used to reward universities for their societal andregional impact but those funds are fairly trivial compared to basic funding streams. Thus, the regionalactivities are mainly based on external funding, of which the amount is increasing. Due to this situation, theuniversity departments are sometimes compelled to participate in projects that are not relevant to their coreactivities. The end of the current EU programming period also brings along new challenges for theUniversity of Jyväskylä, as the share of EU structural funds has been significant (7% of total funding in2004) in carrying out the regional projects. In the future, the funding resources will be increasingly competedwhich requires more intensive collaboration with the other educational institutions and stakeholders in orderto be able to form large and internationally competitive project entities.Creating a new organization cultureThe creation of a more regionally oriented organization culture is in progress at the University of Jyväskylä.However, the phase of regional engagement for the different faculties and departments varies considerably.102
- Page 1 and 2:
OECD/IMHE ‐ Supporting thecontrib
- Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARYTogether with 13 other regio
- Page 5 and 6:
8.2 Increasing the regional effecti
- Page 7 and 8:
I INTRODUCTION1.1 Strengthening the
- Page 9 and 10:
development. The aim is that region
- Page 11 and 12:
The self-evaluation considered here
- Page 13 and 14:
densely populated cities in Finland
- Page 15 and 16:
1,9 %1,7 %1,5 %1,3 %Population chan
- Page 17 and 18:
The share of jobs in primary produc
- Page 19 and 20:
New pillars of future’s developme
- Page 21 and 22:
Jyväskylä0,60,91,11,0Central Finl
- Page 23 and 24:
2.4 Governance StructureMunicipalit
- Page 25 and 26:
of its development outside the cent
- Page 27 and 28:
III CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGHER E
- Page 29 and 30:
continuing education and open unive
- Page 31 and 32:
The Science and Technology Policy C
- Page 33 and 34:
3.2 Regional dimension within the n
- Page 35 and 36:
order to respond to the challenges
- Page 37 and 38:
14001200Master's degreesDoctoratesN
- Page 39 and 40:
900800Youth graduatedAdult graduate
- Page 41 and 42:
provide information for the basis o
- Page 43 and 44:
CabinetParliamentSTPCSteering (andf
- Page 45 and 46:
5,04,0Billion euros3,02,01,00,083 8
- Page 47 and 48:
The number of refereed articles is
- Page 49 and 50:
Centre of expertisePaper industryBi
- Page 51 and 52: The Institute for Environmental Res
- Page 53 and 54: and systematic gradually progressin
- Page 55 and 56: are seen to be very important chann
- Page 57 and 58: Internal support units of HEIsThe F
- Page 59 and 60: of interviewed HEI staffs, the coop
- Page 61 and 62: areas of the region’s Centre of E
- Page 63 and 64: system of Jyväskylä and the HEIs
- Page 65 and 66: V CONTRIBUTION OF TEACHING AND LEAR
- Page 67 and 68: esources to establish new activitie
- Page 69 and 70: The main problem for the Finnish la
- Page 71 and 72: longer. 2.5% of the Jyväskylä Pol
- Page 73 and 74: activities. As a part of the new qu
- Page 75 and 76: education programmes consisting of
- Page 77 and 78: the TE-Centre of Central Finland an
- Page 79 and 80: practices in the provision of educa
- Page 81 and 82: Reason forskillupgradingDescription
- Page 83 and 84: Strengths+ HEIs are actively confro
- Page 85 and 86: taxation, to lower the unemployment
- Page 87 and 88: Box 6.2 The WIRE -projects: Support
- Page 89 and 90: indoor ice-skating rink, the Rauhal
- Page 91 and 92: The School of Cultural Studies at t
- Page 93 and 94: the number of registered customers
- Page 95 and 96: Box 6.9 Environmental management in
- Page 97 and 98: Strengths+ The significance of HEIs
- Page 99 and 100: eferring to the regional developmen
- Page 101: Key topics relating to changes in t
- Page 105 and 106: in the strategy-making process. The
- Page 107 and 108: 7.5 Critical points in promoting th
- Page 109 and 110: 7.Cooperation in strategies concern
- Page 111 and 112: egion is according to national and
- Page 113 and 114: oundaries for further developmental
- Page 115 and 116: joining resources and operations by
- Page 117 and 118: Discussion proposal 15: To ensure d
- Page 119 and 120: achieved by the horizontal utilizat
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix 2 Information on data used
- Page 123 and 124: and finding synergy between the oth
- Page 125 and 126: School of BusinessRoleThe School of
- Page 127 and 128: The challenge of the school from re
- Page 129 and 130: developing wellness and environment
- Page 131 and 132: Faculty of EducationRoleThe Faculty
- Page 133 and 134: and/or graduation thesis is a signi
- Page 135 and 136: Areas of strength and prioritising
- Page 137 and 138: Agora Center’s partners from the
- Page 139 and 140: Currently the priority of ITRI’s
- Page 141 and 142: Weak spots and areas to develop in
- Page 143 and 144: Employment and Economic Development
- Page 145 and 146: Appendix 3 Analysis of the most sig
- Page 147 and 148: Appendix 4 Regional effects (input-
- Page 149 and 150: The overall value of production cre
- Page 151 and 152: Appendix 5 Reform of regional struc
- Page 153 and 154:
Appendix 7 Provision of education i
- Page 155 and 156:
Appendix 8 Statistical information
- Page 157 and 158:
Appendix 10 Statistics on financing
- Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 12 Labour market activity
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix 14 Master’s Programmes a
- Page 163 and 164:
Uusiutuvan energian tutkimusohjelma
- Page 165 and 166:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAcademy of Finland (200