Finland - Jyvaskyla Region - Final Self-Evaluation Report.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 16 Operational expenditure of the University of Jyväskylä in 2003 and 20052003 20051 000 € % 1 000 € %Core funding 74 247 84.9 85 138 89.2Funding of national tasks 3 145 3.6 750 0.8Funding of national programmes 6 740 7.7 5 477 5.7Project funding 1 992 2.3 1 395 1.5Performance based funding 1 299 1.5 2 641 2.8Total 87 423 95 401163
BIBLIOGRAPHYAcademy of Finland (2005), “Kestävä ja dynaaminen kumppanuus. Yliopistojen, tutkimuslaitosten jayritysten välinen tutkimusyhteistyö ja tutkijankoulutus”. (Long-term and dynamic partnerships. Research cooperationand researcher training between universities, research institutes and business companies.)Publication of the Academy of Finland, 3, Helsinki.Employment and Economic Development Centre of Central Finland (2005), “Keskisuomalaisistaoppilaitoksista 2000-2003 valmistuneet.” Jyväskylä.Employment and Economic Development Centre of Central Finland (2005), “Keskisuomalaisten pk-yritystentoimintaympäristö ja kehitysnäkymät 2005”. Publication of Employment and Economic Development Centreof Central Finland, A9, Jyväskylä.European Commission (1999), ”Evaluating Socio-Economic Programmes.” MEANS Collection vol. 1-6.Luxenbourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.European Commission (2003) “Innovation Policy: Updating the Union's Approach in the Context of theLisbon Strategy.” Communication from the Comission to the Council, the European Parliament, theEuropean Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. COM (2003) 112 final. Bryssel.Etzkowitz, H. (2002), “The Triple Helix of University - Industry – Government. Implications for Policy andEvaluation.” Working paper,22, Science Policy Institute, Stockholm.Florida, R. (1995) “Toward the Learning Region”, Futures, 27, pp. 527-536.Florida, R. (2002) “The Rise of the Creative Class”, New York, Basic Books.Haapanen, M. and Nivalainen, S. (2002), “Ikääntyvä ja keskittyvä Suomi – kaupunkien, maaseudun javuorovaikutusalueiden väestökehitys 1975-2030.” Aluekeskus- ja kaupunkipolitiikan yhteistyöryhmänjulkaisu, 1, Helsinki.Jortikka, M. and Zirra, P. (2004), ”International mobility of Finnish higher education”, Centre forInternational Mobility CIMO, Helsinki.Laakso, S., Kilpeläinen, P. and Kuisma, H. (2005), “The Western Finland Objective 2 programme, mid-termevaluation, thematical updating.” (forthcoming)Ministry of Education (2004a), “Education and Research 2003-2008 – Development Plan.” Publications ofthe Ministry of Education, 8, Helsinki.Ministry of Education (2004b), “Management and Steering of Higher Education in Finland.” Publications ofthe Ministry of Education, 20, Helsinki.Ministry of Education (2004c), “Regional strategy for education and research up to 2013.” Publications ofthe Ministry of Education, 11, Helsinki.Ministry of Education (2005a), “Korkeakoulututkintojen viitekehys. Kuvaus suomalaisistakorkeakoulututkinnoista.” (Qualifications Framework. Description of Finnish higher educationqualifications.) Reports of the Ministry of Education, 4, Helsinki.Ministry of Education (2005b), “Opetusministeriön hallinnonalan tuottavuusohjelma 2006-2010.”Publications of the Ministry of Education, 32, Helsinki.164
Page 1 and 2:
OECD/IMHE ‐ Supporting thecontrib
Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARYTogether with 13 other regio
Page 5 and 6:
8.2 Increasing the regional effecti
Page 7 and 8:
I INTRODUCTION1.1 Strengthening the
Page 9 and 10:
development. The aim is that region
Page 11 and 12:
The self-evaluation considered here
Page 13 and 14:
densely populated cities in Finland
Page 15 and 16:
1,9 %1,7 %1,5 %1,3 %Population chan
Page 17 and 18:
The share of jobs in primary produc
Page 19 and 20:
New pillars of future’s developme
Page 21 and 22:
Jyväskylä0,60,91,11,0Central Finl
Page 23 and 24:
2.4 Governance StructureMunicipalit
Page 25 and 26:
of its development outside the cent
Page 27 and 28:
III CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGHER E
Page 29 and 30:
continuing education and open unive
Page 31 and 32:
The Science and Technology Policy C
Page 33 and 34:
3.2 Regional dimension within the n
Page 35 and 36:
order to respond to the challenges
Page 37 and 38:
14001200Master's degreesDoctoratesN
Page 39 and 40:
900800Youth graduatedAdult graduate
Page 41 and 42:
provide information for the basis o
Page 43 and 44:
CabinetParliamentSTPCSteering (andf
Page 45 and 46:
5,04,0Billion euros3,02,01,00,083 8
Page 47 and 48:
The number of refereed articles is
Page 49 and 50:
Centre of expertisePaper industryBi
Page 51 and 52:
The Institute for Environmental Res
Page 53 and 54:
and systematic gradually progressin
Page 55 and 56:
are seen to be very important chann
Page 57 and 58:
Internal support units of HEIsThe F
Page 59 and 60:
of interviewed HEI staffs, the coop
Page 61 and 62:
areas of the region’s Centre of E
Page 63 and 64:
system of Jyväskylä and the HEIs
Page 65 and 66:
V CONTRIBUTION OF TEACHING AND LEAR
Page 67 and 68:
esources to establish new activitie
Page 69 and 70:
The main problem for the Finnish la
Page 71 and 72:
longer. 2.5% of the Jyväskylä Pol
Page 73 and 74:
activities. As a part of the new qu
Page 75 and 76:
education programmes consisting of
Page 77 and 78:
the TE-Centre of Central Finland an
Page 79 and 80:
practices in the provision of educa
Page 81 and 82:
Reason forskillupgradingDescription
Page 83 and 84:
Strengths+ HEIs are actively confro
Page 85 and 86:
taxation, to lower the unemployment
Page 87 and 88:
Box 6.2 The WIRE -projects: Support
Page 89 and 90:
indoor ice-skating rink, the Rauhal
Page 91 and 92:
The School of Cultural Studies at t
Page 93 and 94:
the number of registered customers
Page 95 and 96:
Box 6.9 Environmental management in
Page 97 and 98:
Strengths+ The significance of HEIs
Page 99 and 100:
eferring to the regional developmen
Page 101 and 102:
Key topics relating to changes in t
Page 103 and 104:
participation in the decision makin
Page 105 and 106:
in the strategy-making process. The
Page 107 and 108:
7.5 Critical points in promoting th
Page 109 and 110:
7.Cooperation in strategies concern
Page 111 and 112:
egion is according to national and
Page 113 and 114: oundaries for further developmental
Page 115 and 116: joining resources and operations by
Page 117 and 118: Discussion proposal 15: To ensure d
Page 119 and 120: achieved by the horizontal utilizat
Page 121 and 122: Appendix 2 Information on data used
Page 123 and 124: and finding synergy between the oth
Page 125 and 126: School of BusinessRoleThe School of
Page 127 and 128: The challenge of the school from re
Page 129 and 130: developing wellness and environment
Page 131 and 132: Faculty of EducationRoleThe Faculty
Page 133 and 134: and/or graduation thesis is a signi
Page 135 and 136: Areas of strength and prioritising
Page 137 and 138: Agora Center’s partners from the
Page 139 and 140: Currently the priority of ITRI’s
Page 141 and 142: Weak spots and areas to develop in
Page 143 and 144: Employment and Economic Development
Page 145 and 146: Appendix 3 Analysis of the most sig
Page 147 and 148: Appendix 4 Regional effects (input-
Page 149 and 150: The overall value of production cre
Page 151 and 152: Appendix 5 Reform of regional struc
Page 153 and 154: Appendix 7 Provision of education i
Page 155 and 156: Appendix 8 Statistical information
Page 157 and 158: Appendix 10 Statistics on financing
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 12 Labour market activity
Page 161 and 162: Appendix 14 Master’s Programmes a
Page 163: Uusiutuvan energian tutkimusohjelma
show all

Finland - Jyvaskyla Region - Final Self-Evaluation Report.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?