Finland - Jyvaskyla Region - Final Self-Evaluation Report.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDICESAppendix 1 Members of the Regional Steering Committee, Working Group and RegionalCoordination TeamThe Regional Steering Committee comprises of members representing the following organizations:Chair: Ossi V. Lindqvist (Professor Emeritus, Chair of the Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council),KuopioJukka Akselin, Managing Director, Jyväskylä Science Park (www.jsp.fi)Jouni Juutilainen, Regional Development Chief, City of Jyväskylä (www.jyvaskyla.fi)Anita Mikkonen, Executive Director CEO, Regional Council of Central Finland (www.keskisuomi.fi)Ritva Nirkkonen, Managing Director, Jyväskylä Regional Development Company – Jykes (www.jykes.fi)Mauri Panhelainen, Rector, Jyväskylä Polytechnic (www.jypoly.fi)Kyösti Saarimäki, Chair of the Board, Federation of Finnish Enterprises (regional unit of Central Finland)(www.keski-suomi.yrittajat.fi)Ari Saarinen, Counsellor for Education, Ministry of Education (www.minedu.fi)Aino Sallinen, Rector, University of Jyväskylä (www.jyu.fi)Uljas Valkeinen, Managing Director, Central Finland Chamber of Commerce(www.centralfinlandchamber.fi)The Working Group comprises of members representing the following organizations:Lea Goyal, EU-Coordinator, State Provincial Office of Western Finland (www.laaninhallitus.fi/lansi)Hannu Korhonen, Director of Planning and Development, Regional Council of Central Finland(www.keskisuomi.fi)Eero Suosara, Jyväskylä Polytechnic (www.jypoly.fi)Toivo Takala, Senior Coordinator, University of Jyväskylä (www.jyu.fi)The Regional Coordination Team:Kirsi Mukkala, Researcher, University of JyväskyläJari Ritsilä, Leading Researcher, University of Jyväskylä119
Appendix 2 Information on data used in this reportData gatheringThe data was gathered during May-August 2005. The internet-questionnaire was addressed to the faculties ofthe university and schools of the polytechnic. It was sent to 76 persons (35 persons in the polytechnic and 41in university) and the total response rate was 75% (86% and 66%, respectively). The questionnaire mappedout the opinions of the HEIs’ actors on central themes concerning the self evaluation, namely, (1) startingpointsand channels of the regional effects of their unit, (2) geographic dimension of their operations, (3)importance of regional cooperation in their primary strategies and operations, (4) nature and deepness oftheir interplay with the other HEI of region, business sector and other stakeholders, and (5) proposals fordeveloping the regional linkages in the future.Deeper information was gathered by personal interviews with the key persons of faculties/schools andseparate institutions of HEIs (a total number of interviews was 24) and by discussions with the rectors.Interviews or workshops were organized also with stakeholders of HEIs.Interviews/workshops:Ministry of Education/Department of Education and Science Policy:Erja Heikkinen, Counsellor of Education, University DivisionPetteri Kauppinen, Senior Adviser, Science DivisionOsmo Lampinen, Counsellor of Education, Polytechnic DivisionMarkku Mattila, Director, University DivisionTarmo Mykkänen, Senior Adviser, Polytechnic DivisionAri Saarinen, Senior Adviser, University DivisionUniversity of Jyväskylä:Aino Sallinen, RectorHeikki Hanka, Professor/Vice Dean, Faculty of HumanitiesJukka Heikkilä, Professor/Dean, Faculty of Information technologyLauri Laakso, Professor/Dean, Faculty of Health and Sport SciencesMatti Manninen, Professor/Dean, Faculty of Mathematics and ScienceMikko Mäntysaari, Professor/Dean, faculty of Social SciencesJaakko Pehkonen, Professor/Dean, School of Business and EconomicsHelena Rasku-Puttonen, Professor/Dean, Faculty of EducationSatu Helin, Director, Open UniversityJouko Korppi-Tommola, Professor, Nanoscience Center, Renewable energySirkka-Liisa Korppi-Tommola, Research Manager, Research ServicesJarmo Meriläinen, Director, Institute for Environmental ResearchPekka Neittaanmäki, Professor/Director, Agora CenterAnna-Liisa Rassi, Director, Continuing Education CentreJari Veijalainen, Senior researcher/Director, Information Technology Research InstituteJouni Välijärvi, Professor/Director, Institute for Educational ResarchJyväskylä Polytechnic:Jussi Halttunen, Director of Strategic DevelopmentMauri Panhelainen, RectorHannu Ikonen, Direcor, School of Cultural StudiesJyrki Kataja, Director, Institute of Natural ResourcesEila Latvala, Director, School of Health and Social StudiesAnnikki Mikkonen, Director, School of Tourism and Services ManagementUlla Mutka, Direcor, Vocational Teacher Education CollegeHeikki Saastamoinen, Director, School of Information Technology120
Page 1 and 2:
OECD/IMHE ‐ Supporting thecontrib
Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARYTogether with 13 other regio
Page 5 and 6:
8.2 Increasing the regional effecti
Page 7 and 8:
I INTRODUCTION1.1 Strengthening the
Page 9 and 10:
development. The aim is that region
Page 11 and 12:
The self-evaluation considered here
Page 13 and 14:
densely populated cities in Finland
Page 15 and 16:
1,9 %1,7 %1,5 %1,3 %Population chan
Page 17 and 18:
The share of jobs in primary produc
Page 19 and 20:
New pillars of future’s developme
Page 21 and 22:
Jyväskylä0,60,91,11,0Central Finl
Page 23 and 24:
2.4 Governance StructureMunicipalit
Page 25 and 26:
of its development outside the cent
Page 27 and 28:
III CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGHER E
Page 29 and 30:
continuing education and open unive
Page 31 and 32:
The Science and Technology Policy C
Page 33 and 34:
3.2 Regional dimension within the n
Page 35 and 36:
order to respond to the challenges
Page 37 and 38:
14001200Master's degreesDoctoratesN
Page 39 and 40:
900800Youth graduatedAdult graduate
Page 41 and 42:
provide information for the basis o
Page 43 and 44:
CabinetParliamentSTPCSteering (andf
Page 45 and 46:
5,04,0Billion euros3,02,01,00,083 8
Page 47 and 48:
The number of refereed articles is
Page 49 and 50:
Centre of expertisePaper industryBi
Page 51 and 52:
The Institute for Environmental Res
Page 53 and 54:
and systematic gradually progressin
Page 55 and 56:
are seen to be very important chann
Page 57 and 58:
Internal support units of HEIsThe F
Page 59 and 60:
of interviewed HEI staffs, the coop
Page 61 and 62:
areas of the region’s Centre of E
Page 63 and 64:
system of Jyväskylä and the HEIs
Page 65 and 66:
V CONTRIBUTION OF TEACHING AND LEAR
Page 67 and 68:
esources to establish new activitie
Page 69 and 70: The main problem for the Finnish la
Page 71 and 72: longer. 2.5% of the Jyväskylä Pol
Page 73 and 74: activities. As a part of the new qu
Page 75 and 76: education programmes consisting of
Page 77 and 78: the TE-Centre of Central Finland an
Page 79 and 80: practices in the provision of educa
Page 81 and 82: Reason forskillupgradingDescription
Page 83 and 84: Strengths+ HEIs are actively confro
Page 85 and 86: taxation, to lower the unemployment
Page 87 and 88: Box 6.2 The WIRE -projects: Support
Page 89 and 90: indoor ice-skating rink, the Rauhal
Page 91 and 92: The School of Cultural Studies at t
Page 93 and 94: the number of registered customers
Page 95 and 96: Box 6.9 Environmental management in
Page 97 and 98: Strengths+ The significance of HEIs
Page 99 and 100: eferring to the regional developmen
Page 101 and 102: Key topics relating to changes in t
Page 103 and 104: participation in the decision makin
Page 105 and 106: in the strategy-making process. The
Page 107 and 108: 7.5 Critical points in promoting th
Page 109 and 110: 7.Cooperation in strategies concern
Page 111 and 112: egion is according to national and
Page 113 and 114: oundaries for further developmental
Page 115 and 116: joining resources and operations by
Page 117 and 118: Discussion proposal 15: To ensure d
Page 119: achieved by the horizontal utilizat
Page 123 and 124: and finding synergy between the oth
Page 125 and 126: School of BusinessRoleThe School of
Page 127 and 128: The challenge of the school from re
Page 129 and 130: developing wellness and environment
Page 131 and 132: Faculty of EducationRoleThe Faculty
Page 133 and 134: and/or graduation thesis is a signi
Page 135 and 136: Areas of strength and prioritising
Page 137 and 138: Agora Center’s partners from the
Page 139 and 140: Currently the priority of ITRI’s
Page 141 and 142: Weak spots and areas to develop in
Page 143 and 144: Employment and Economic Development
Page 145 and 146: Appendix 3 Analysis of the most sig
Page 147 and 148: Appendix 4 Regional effects (input-
Page 149 and 150: The overall value of production cre
Page 151 and 152: Appendix 5 Reform of regional struc
Page 153 and 154: Appendix 7 Provision of education i
Page 155 and 156: Appendix 8 Statistical information
Page 157 and 158: Appendix 10 Statistics on financing
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 12 Labour market activity
Page 161 and 162: Appendix 14 Master’s Programmes a
Page 163 and 164: Uusiutuvan energian tutkimusohjelma
Page 165 and 166: BIBLIOGRAPHYAcademy of Finland (200
show all

Finland - Jyvaskyla Region - Final Self-Evaluation Report.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?