<strong>Region</strong>EURmillionR&D 2002 R&D 2003 R&D 2004% of allEUREUREUREURper% of all permillionmillioncapitacapita% of allWhole Country 4830 100,0 928 5005 100,0 959 5253 100,0 1003Central <strong>Finland</strong> 182 3,8 685 192 3,8 723 211 4,0 788Jyväskylä region 159 3,3 995 171 3,4 1057 181 3,4 1107Table 4.1 R&D expenditure in the Jyväskylä region, Central <strong>Finland</strong> and in the whole countryEURpercapitaThe amount of external research funding the University of Jyväskylä in 2004 was nearly EUR 32 million ofwhich the shares of Academy of <strong>Finland</strong> and Tekes were 39% and 12%, respectively (see Table 1 inAppendix 10). The former exceeds the national average for universities (32% in 2004) but the share ofTekes funding is below the national average (21.5%). The University of Jyväskylä was among the ten mainreceivers of Tekes funding in 2004 (Table 4.2). It is worth noticing that the number of the University’sTekes-projects was 20 which, in proportion to the received amount of funding, points to the small size ofthese projects. The Jyväskylä Polytechnic received Tekes funding for three projects in 2004. IncreasingTekes funding in the future is an important goal in the region of Jyväskylä.Funding, EUR MILLION Number of projectsTechnical Research Centre of <strong>Finland</strong> (VTT) 39.9 203Helsinki University of Technology 29.8 130Tampere University of Technology 16.6 74University of Oulu 10.5 46University of Kuopio 9.8 43University of Helsinki 8.3 48University of Turku 6.2 29Lappeenranta University of Technology 4.3 23Åbo Akademi 3.4 12University of Jyväskylä 3.3 20Total funding of public research 158.1 775Share of 10 main receivers 84% 81%Table 4.2 Main receivers of public research funding from Tekes in 2004 (Source: Tekes)EU funding is an important contributor to the regional projects in both HEIs in the region of Jyväskylä(Appendix 10). At the University of Jyväskylä it covered one fifth of the total external funding and 35% ofthe EU funding was allocated to research in 2004. For the Jyväskylä Polytechnic the funding based on EUStructural funds is the main single funding source of its R&D projects. EU and state funding covered 72% ofthe total external R&D funding of the Polytechnic in 2004 (Table 2 in Appendix 10). The other importantexternal funding sources of the HEIs are, e.g., ministries (also other than the Ministry of Education),municipalities, foundations and private sector companies.4.3 Research personnel of HEIsThe research and development activities require a considerable effort from the skilled researchers and otherstaff. The number of person years of research staff in universities has increased markedly, by 31%, in 1999-2004. During the same period, the increase of research staff at the University of Jyväskylä has beenmoderate, being 14%. In the fields of humanities and science the number of research staff at the Universityof Jyväskylä has increased more than on the average in the country. In universities the professors also have astrong contribution in research activities. In polytechnics the R&D activities are integrated to the tasks ofteaching staff and thus the number of staff focusing primarily on R&D is minor (their number has not beenregistered separately until lately). In the Jyväskylä Polytechnic the number of R&D staff is rapidly increasingas the R&D activities are more and more prominent in its operations.45
The number of refereed articles is typically used to measure the volume and quality of research activities 9 . Atthe University of Jyväskylä the number of refereed articles has nearly doubled over the period from 1994 to2004 (964 refereed articles in total, of which nearly 80% were international articles in 2004), which indicatesthat high level research is being carried out (Figure 4.4). The main part, nearly 40%, of the refereed articlesis based on the research activities of the Faculty of Mathematics and Science. The number of refereedarticles is used as one of the criteria for the allocation of performance-based funding between faculties andother units at the University of Jyväskylä.140001200010000800060004000200001274711747108579838 10089 10235521 594 737 900 880 9641994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004University of JyväskyläFinnish universitiesFigure 4.4 Refereed articles at the University of Jyväskylä in 1994-2004 (Source: KOTA -database)4.4 Strategic focal points and fields of strength of the HEIsThe regional orientation differs between the research done at universities and the R&D of polytechnics. Therole of polytechnic R&D is more directly focused on serving the regional needs whereas the universities arecharacterized as more national and international operators. This different kind of orientation forms a basis forthe fields of strength of the Jyväskylä Polytechnic and University of Jyväskylä.The Jyväskylä <strong>Region</strong> is involved in a national Centre of Expertise Programme with paper manufacturingtechnology, environmental, energy and nanotechnology along with information technology as its areas ofstrength (Box 4.1). Wellness technology is an integrated part of the <strong>Region</strong>al Centre Programme ofJyväskylä. The Jyväskylä Polytechnic and University of Jyväskylä participate actively in the development ofthese fields.9 The University of Jyväskylä was ranked second in the national assessment of the productivity of universities. In theassessment the basic funding of the Ministry of Education and total funding of universities were used as resources, andbasic and doctoral degrees, summarized articles (in international scientific journals based on the referee-method), andconference articles (in international conference publications) were considered products. (Neittaanmäki et al., 2005.)46
- Page 1 and 2: OECD/IMHE ‐ Supporting thecontrib
- Page 3 and 4: SUMMARYTogether with 13 other regio
- Page 5 and 6: 8.2 Increasing the regional effecti
- Page 7 and 8: I INTRODUCTION1.1 Strengthening the
- Page 9 and 10: development. The aim is that region
- Page 11 and 12: The self-evaluation considered here
- Page 13 and 14: densely populated cities in Finland
- Page 15 and 16: 1,9 %1,7 %1,5 %1,3 %Population chan
- Page 17 and 18: The share of jobs in primary produc
- Page 19 and 20: New pillars of future’s developme
- Page 21 and 22: Jyväskylä0,60,91,11,0Central Finl
- Page 23 and 24: 2.4 Governance StructureMunicipalit
- Page 25 and 26: of its development outside the cent
- Page 27 and 28: III CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGHER E
- Page 29 and 30: continuing education and open unive
- Page 31 and 32: The Science and Technology Policy C
- Page 33 and 34: 3.2 Regional dimension within the n
- Page 35 and 36: order to respond to the challenges
- Page 37 and 38: 14001200Master's degreesDoctoratesN
- Page 39 and 40: 900800Youth graduatedAdult graduate
- Page 41 and 42: provide information for the basis o
- Page 43 and 44: CabinetParliamentSTPCSteering (andf
- Page 45: 5,04,0Billion euros3,02,01,00,083 8
- Page 49 and 50: Centre of expertisePaper industryBi
- Page 51 and 52: The Institute for Environmental Res
- Page 53 and 54: and systematic gradually progressin
- Page 55 and 56: are seen to be very important chann
- Page 57 and 58: Internal support units of HEIsThe F
- Page 59 and 60: of interviewed HEI staffs, the coop
- Page 61 and 62: areas of the region’s Centre of E
- Page 63 and 64: system of Jyväskylä and the HEIs
- Page 65 and 66: V CONTRIBUTION OF TEACHING AND LEAR
- Page 67 and 68: esources to establish new activitie
- Page 69 and 70: The main problem for the Finnish la
- Page 71 and 72: longer. 2.5% of the Jyväskylä Pol
- Page 73 and 74: activities. As a part of the new qu
- Page 75 and 76: education programmes consisting of
- Page 77 and 78: the TE-Centre of Central Finland an
- Page 79 and 80: practices in the provision of educa
- Page 81 and 82: Reason forskillupgradingDescription
- Page 83 and 84: Strengths+ HEIs are actively confro
- Page 85 and 86: taxation, to lower the unemployment
- Page 87 and 88: Box 6.2 The WIRE -projects: Support
- Page 89 and 90: indoor ice-skating rink, the Rauhal
- Page 91 and 92: The School of Cultural Studies at t
- Page 93 and 94: the number of registered customers
- Page 95 and 96: Box 6.9 Environmental management in
- Page 97 and 98:
Strengths+ The significance of HEIs
- Page 99 and 100:
eferring to the regional developmen
- Page 101 and 102:
Key topics relating to changes in t
- Page 103 and 104:
participation in the decision makin
- Page 105 and 106:
in the strategy-making process. The
- Page 107 and 108:
7.5 Critical points in promoting th
- Page 109 and 110:
7.Cooperation in strategies concern
- Page 111 and 112:
egion is according to national and
- Page 113 and 114:
oundaries for further developmental
- Page 115 and 116:
joining resources and operations by
- Page 117 and 118:
Discussion proposal 15: To ensure d
- Page 119 and 120:
achieved by the horizontal utilizat
- Page 121 and 122:
Appendix 2 Information on data used
- Page 123 and 124:
and finding synergy between the oth
- Page 125 and 126:
School of BusinessRoleThe School of
- Page 127 and 128:
The challenge of the school from re
- Page 129 and 130:
developing wellness and environment
- Page 131 and 132:
Faculty of EducationRoleThe Faculty
- Page 133 and 134:
and/or graduation thesis is a signi
- Page 135 and 136:
Areas of strength and prioritising
- Page 137 and 138:
Agora Center’s partners from the
- Page 139 and 140:
Currently the priority of ITRI’s
- Page 141 and 142:
Weak spots and areas to develop in
- Page 143 and 144:
Employment and Economic Development
- Page 145 and 146:
Appendix 3 Analysis of the most sig
- Page 147 and 148:
Appendix 4 Regional effects (input-
- Page 149 and 150:
The overall value of production cre
- Page 151 and 152:
Appendix 5 Reform of regional struc
- Page 153 and 154:
Appendix 7 Provision of education i
- Page 155 and 156:
Appendix 8 Statistical information
- Page 157 and 158:
Appendix 10 Statistics on financing
- Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 12 Labour market activity
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix 14 Master’s Programmes a
- Page 163 and 164:
Uusiutuvan energian tutkimusohjelma
- Page 165 and 166:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAcademy of Finland (200