Appendix 9 Patents as indicators of R&D activityTable 1 Patents per 1000 inhabitants in Central <strong>Finland</strong>, Jyväskylä and <strong>Finland</strong><strong>Region</strong> 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 AverageWhole Country 0,27 0,28 0,31 0,35 0,35 0,36 0,33 0,32Central <strong>Finland</strong> 0,34 0,28 0,41 0,53 0,49 0,41 0,51 0,43Jyväskylä 0,50 0,41 0,60 0,80 0,69 0,63 0,73 0,62Table 2 Patents per 100 enterprises in central <strong>Finland</strong>, Jyväskylä and <strong>Finland</strong><strong>Region</strong> 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 AverageWhole Country 0,66 0,64 0,68 0,74 0,74 0,74 0,69 0,70Central <strong>Finland</strong> 0,91 0,70 1,00 1,25 1,15 0,96 1,16 1,02Jyväskylä 1,34 1,06 1,49 1,94 1,64 1,50 1,72 1,53155
Appendix 10 Statistics on financing of HEIsTable 1 Budget funding and external funding* of universities in 1994-2004, EUR 1 000 (Source: KOTAdatabase)All universitiesUniversity of Jyväskylä1994 1999 2004 1994 1999 2004Budget funding (1 000 €) 644 123 977 418 1 234 894 45 899 74 074 90 453External funding (1 000 €) 283 531 521 478 690 011 17 473 39 397 50 721- Academy of <strong>Finland</strong>, % 15.0 16.7 20.9 14.7 20.2 24.4- Tekes, % - 16.2 13.2 - 8.2 7.5- Domestic firm, % - 14.6 14.5 - 10.6 6.1- Other domestic source, % 79.9 41.6 37.4 83.7 51.0 42.0- EU-funding, % - 8.0 10.7 - 9.0 19.8- Foreign firm, % - 1.1 1.5 - - 0.2- Other foreign source, % 5.1 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.0 -* The relative shares of different funding sources of total external funding are represented.Table 2 External research funding of the Universities in 2000-2004, EUR 1 000 (Source: KOTA database)All universitiesUniversity of Jyväskylä2000 2002 2004 2000 2002 2004Total external research funding 331 503 384 044 438 666 24 193 21 752 31 574- Academy of <strong>Finland</strong>, % 28.6 28.7 32.0 32.1 37.1 39.2- Tekes, % 27.4 21.0 20.5 19.8 12.1 12.1- Domestic firm, % 10.8 12.5 12.2 6.7 5.5 8.8- Other domestic source, % 21.6 23.2 22.4 26.0 27.5 28.3- EU-funding, % 7.1 9.5 8.8 13.4 17.1 11.2- Foreign firm, % 2.0 2.5 2.0 - - 0.3- Other foreign source, % 2.5 2.5 2.0 1.9 0.6 -Table 3 Financing of the Jyväskylä Polytechnic in 2001-2004, EUR 1 0002001 2002 2003 2004Turnover 38 665 41 916 43 597 46 072External T&K funding 3 466 3 422 4 709 6 051- EU/State, % - - 75.1 71.7- Municipal funding, % - - 6.9 5.9- Private funding, % - - 4.2 3.9- Other public funding, % - - 5.0 4.8- Other funding, % - - 8.9 13.7156
- Page 1 and 2:
OECD/IMHE ‐ Supporting thecontrib
- Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARYTogether with 13 other regio
- Page 5 and 6:
8.2 Increasing the regional effecti
- Page 7 and 8:
I INTRODUCTION1.1 Strengthening the
- Page 9 and 10:
development. The aim is that region
- Page 11 and 12:
The self-evaluation considered here
- Page 13 and 14:
densely populated cities in Finland
- Page 15 and 16:
1,9 %1,7 %1,5 %1,3 %Population chan
- Page 17 and 18:
The share of jobs in primary produc
- Page 19 and 20:
New pillars of future’s developme
- Page 21 and 22:
Jyväskylä0,60,91,11,0Central Finl
- Page 23 and 24:
2.4 Governance StructureMunicipalit
- Page 25 and 26:
of its development outside the cent
- Page 27 and 28:
III CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGHER E
- Page 29 and 30:
continuing education and open unive
- Page 31 and 32:
The Science and Technology Policy C
- Page 33 and 34:
3.2 Regional dimension within the n
- Page 35 and 36:
order to respond to the challenges
- Page 37 and 38:
14001200Master's degreesDoctoratesN
- Page 39 and 40:
900800Youth graduatedAdult graduate
- Page 41 and 42:
provide information for the basis o
- Page 43 and 44:
CabinetParliamentSTPCSteering (andf
- Page 45 and 46:
5,04,0Billion euros3,02,01,00,083 8
- Page 47 and 48:
The number of refereed articles is
- Page 49 and 50:
Centre of expertisePaper industryBi
- Page 51 and 52:
The Institute for Environmental Res
- Page 53 and 54:
and systematic gradually progressin
- Page 55 and 56:
are seen to be very important chann
- Page 57 and 58:
Internal support units of HEIsThe F
- Page 59 and 60:
of interviewed HEI staffs, the coop
- Page 61 and 62:
areas of the region’s Centre of E
- Page 63 and 64:
system of Jyväskylä and the HEIs
- Page 65 and 66:
V CONTRIBUTION OF TEACHING AND LEAR
- Page 67 and 68:
esources to establish new activitie
- Page 69 and 70:
The main problem for the Finnish la
- Page 71 and 72:
longer. 2.5% of the Jyväskylä Pol
- Page 73 and 74:
activities. As a part of the new qu
- Page 75 and 76:
education programmes consisting of
- Page 77 and 78:
the TE-Centre of Central Finland an
- Page 79 and 80:
practices in the provision of educa
- Page 81 and 82:
Reason forskillupgradingDescription
- Page 83 and 84:
Strengths+ HEIs are actively confro
- Page 85 and 86:
taxation, to lower the unemployment
- Page 87 and 88:
Box 6.2 The WIRE -projects: Support
- Page 89 and 90:
indoor ice-skating rink, the Rauhal
- Page 91 and 92:
The School of Cultural Studies at t
- Page 93 and 94:
the number of registered customers
- Page 95 and 96:
Box 6.9 Environmental management in
- Page 97 and 98:
Strengths+ The significance of HEIs
- Page 99 and 100:
eferring to the regional developmen
- Page 101 and 102:
Key topics relating to changes in t
- Page 103 and 104:
participation in the decision makin
- Page 105 and 106: in the strategy-making process. The
- Page 107 and 108: 7.5 Critical points in promoting th
- Page 109 and 110: 7.Cooperation in strategies concern
- Page 111 and 112: egion is according to national and
- Page 113 and 114: oundaries for further developmental
- Page 115 and 116: joining resources and operations by
- Page 117 and 118: Discussion proposal 15: To ensure d
- Page 119 and 120: achieved by the horizontal utilizat
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix 2 Information on data used
- Page 123 and 124: and finding synergy between the oth
- Page 125 and 126: School of BusinessRoleThe School of
- Page 127 and 128: The challenge of the school from re
- Page 129 and 130: developing wellness and environment
- Page 131 and 132: Faculty of EducationRoleThe Faculty
- Page 133 and 134: and/or graduation thesis is a signi
- Page 135 and 136: Areas of strength and prioritising
- Page 137 and 138: Agora Center’s partners from the
- Page 139 and 140: Currently the priority of ITRI’s
- Page 141 and 142: Weak spots and areas to develop in
- Page 143 and 144: Employment and Economic Development
- Page 145 and 146: Appendix 3 Analysis of the most sig
- Page 147 and 148: Appendix 4 Regional effects (input-
- Page 149 and 150: The overall value of production cre
- Page 151 and 152: Appendix 5 Reform of regional struc
- Page 153 and 154: Appendix 7 Provision of education i
- Page 155: Appendix 8 Statistical information
- Page 159 and 160: Appendix 12 Labour market activity
- Page 161 and 162: Appendix 14 Master’s Programmes a
- Page 163 and 164: Uusiutuvan energian tutkimusohjelma
- Page 165 and 166: BIBLIOGRAPHYAcademy of Finland (200