Box 4.4 The cluster of expertise in renewable energyIn the initial phase of the Centre of Expertise Programme in the mid 1990s the professorships ofenvironmental technology were created at the University of Jyväskylä with the financial support ofproject and private sector funding. This was followed by the allocation of project funding to thedevelopment of expertise in biogas technology by getting pilot equipment and instruments for forming aresearch environment. This process has allowed the development of expertise in the field of renewableenergy, and businesses connected to it are expected to increase in number and to extend eveninternationally in the future.A large group of actors cooperates in the field of renewable energy in Central <strong>Finland</strong>. In addition to theHEIs, this group includes the VTT Technical Research Centre of <strong>Finland</strong>, Jyväskylä Science Park,municipalities and enterprises. The Jyväskylä Polytechnic’s Institute for Natural Resources is asignificant provider of education in the field of bioenergy within the province and has notable expertisein project work. It also functions as an expert for an international centre of expertise in bioenergy. TheUniversity of Jyväskylä has established a Study and Research Programme in Renewable Energy, whichrelies heavily on the expertise in the Faculty of Mathematics and Science. Research focuses on biogas,liquid biofuels, solar heat and electricity, local hybrid solutions and hydrogen technology. Theprogramme is a joint educational and research effort of three faculties of the University of Jyväskylä(coordinated by the Chemistry Department), and it received EU structural funding in the amount of EUR1.5 million for the years 2003 – 2006. The cluster of expertise in the area is strengthened by BENET, abioenergy consortium of enterprises and public organizations of Central <strong>Finland</strong> managed by theJyväskylä Science Park. BENET aims at combining the resources of regional enterprises and carrying outlarger and more challenging development projects than the member organizations could manage on theirown.Energy technology is one of the key fields of the Jyväskylä Centre of Expertise Programme.Emphasising renewable energy supports on its part the much needed prioritization of activities. Themultidisciplinary challenges and horizontal innovations involved in the field of renewable energy requirecooperation of many different types of experts. The aim is to transfer this expertise to the use of region’sbusiness life through project work, thus creating new business that would further strengthen the cluster ofexpertise. The development of the renewable energy field supports goals set for sustainable developmentat both national and EU-level and conforms with the policies of the Lisbon strategy on commercializinginnovations. The project is expected to have significant regional effects in the future. Knowledgedevelopment and the networked based operation aiming at the development of business are in a keyposition.Two aspects are important to consider when analysing the transfer of R&D knowledge of HEIs to regionalactors. Firstly, it is essential to meet the emerging needs and demands of firms (demand orientation), andsecondly, the HEIs’ expertise should be easily accessible (availability). According to the findings, mappingout the R&D needs and demands of firms and other regional actors is not systematically organized in theHEIs of the Jyväskylä region even if its relevance is well acknowledged among the staff. There is alsosignificant variation in the level of demand orientation between the fields of study of both institutions. Oneimportant step towards more systematic information gathering was the launching of the learning networkteam of Central <strong>Finland</strong> – OPTIIMI, in 2004. It aims at mapping out the future needs of firms and otherorganizations in Central <strong>Finland</strong>. However, the possibilities of OPTIIMI to concentrate on the needs ofindividual firms are limited and thus remain in charge of the faculties and schools.Due to the more regionally oriented role of polytechnics, the Jyväskylä Polytechnic seems to be more activein surveying the regional needs. To support the continuing interaction with the regional actors thePolytechnic has developed a system of advisory councils, which allows for the representatives of firms,regional organizations and other important partners to discuss the new development ideas and needs. Theexperiences of this type of an activity have been quite positive.The representatives of both HEIs are unanimous in their opinion about the importance of networks. Effectiveinteractive networks based on partnership and common goals among firms, HEIs and other regional actors53
are seen to be very important channels for the transfer of information about the needs and demands of firmsand other regional actors. However, the interviews revealed that information gathering through networks isnot systematically organized in the HEIs, and that the existing networks are mainly based on informalpersonal contacts. Thus, the networking activities involve significant potential which is so far underused. Inaddition to the transfer of information from the regional actors to the HEIs, the networks could be used moreeffectively as a channel to the opposite direction. In other words, the information on the knowledge base andR&D activities offered by HEIs could be transferred to the other actors of the region.Constructing some kind of a customer management system might be one possible solution for eliciting therelevant information. The development of networks is one of the strategic themes of the JyväskyläPolytechnic at present and it is included in their balance scorecard, which attempts to measure and providefeedback in order to facilitate the implementation of strategies and objectives. The schools list their partnersand evaluate the coverage and development needs of their networks. This is followed by the definition oflevel estimates and discussion of probable measures that might be needed. At best, this procedure will lead toa more effective utilization of networks at the Jyväskylä Polytechnic.Challenges in creating cooperation with firmsEven if the HEIs were able to provide the best possible know-how for the use of firms and other regionalorganizations there is no guarantee for its effective utilization in the region. This implies that the potentialcustomers and/or partners should also be capable of receiving and processing the know-how based on theactivities of the HEIs.The representatives of the HEIs were asked to estimate on a scale from 4 to 10 the readiness of regionalfirms to benefit from their research activities and expertise. The results indicate that this readiness is at anaverage level or below, i.e. the research activities get the mean value of 6.6 and expertise 7.3. Familiarizationwith the R&D activities of the HEIs among the regional actors varies between the faculties and schools.Typically, the polytechnic activities are better known in the region than those of the university.In a recent study by the Employment and Economic Development Centre of Central <strong>Finland</strong> (2005) theviews on the operational environment and development prospects of a sample of small and medium sizedfirms (n=211) in Central <strong>Finland</strong> were surveyed. One part of the survey focused on the cooperation patternsof firms. The firms were asked, for instance, to mention the main reasons for their cooperation withuniversities and polytechnics. According to the responses, the main purpose of the cooperation withuniversities is to stimulate the growth of markets and extend the knowledge base. In turn, active cooperationwith polytechnics aims, particularly, at complementing resources, extending markets and raising the level ofknowledge.The quality and quantity of HEIs – industry -relationships vary between the Jyväskylä Polytechnic and theUniversity of Jyväskylä and within them as well. Some large companies like Metso, Nokia and Tietoenatormake a significant contribution to the region of Jyväskylä (employing approximately 3 000 workers) andthey are important partners for both HEIs. In addition to the education of competent workers, the HEIs carryout joint R&D projects with the large companies (e.g., aiming at improving the internal processes of thosecompanies). A great challenge of the globalizing world is to ensure a competitive operational environmentfor these key firms in the region of Jyväskylä also in the future. The cooperation between HEIs and SMEs inthe region is fairly random and poorly developed, with the exception of joint projects with some hightechnology firms, especially IT-firms.The HEIs in the region of Jyväskylä face certain difficulties in their attempts to cooperate with firms,particularly with SMEs. Due to the rather small size of the Jyväskylä region there are not enough firms toprofit from the knowledge and R&D capacity of the HEIs. Particularly the firms with a significant growthpotential and willingness to work actively in R&D are lacking in the region. The firms’ share of R&Dexpenditure of the region of Jyväskylä in 2003 was 54% whereas the national average was 70.5%.There are a large number of small firms in the region but their problems are that they usually cannot predictor recognize their long term needs and individually, they do not have enough resources to join the researchprojects of the HEIs. In fact, any large-scale projects might become too burdensome for small firms due to54
- Page 1 and 2:
OECD/IMHE ‐ Supporting thecontrib
- Page 3 and 4: SUMMARYTogether with 13 other regio
- Page 5 and 6: 8.2 Increasing the regional effecti
- Page 7 and 8: I INTRODUCTION1.1 Strengthening the
- Page 9 and 10: development. The aim is that region
- Page 11 and 12: The self-evaluation considered here
- Page 13 and 14: densely populated cities in Finland
- Page 15 and 16: 1,9 %1,7 %1,5 %1,3 %Population chan
- Page 17 and 18: The share of jobs in primary produc
- Page 19 and 20: New pillars of future’s developme
- Page 21 and 22: Jyväskylä0,60,91,11,0Central Finl
- Page 23 and 24: 2.4 Governance StructureMunicipalit
- Page 25 and 26: of its development outside the cent
- Page 27 and 28: III CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGHER E
- Page 29 and 30: continuing education and open unive
- Page 31 and 32: The Science and Technology Policy C
- Page 33 and 34: 3.2 Regional dimension within the n
- Page 35 and 36: order to respond to the challenges
- Page 37 and 38: 14001200Master's degreesDoctoratesN
- Page 39 and 40: 900800Youth graduatedAdult graduate
- Page 41 and 42: provide information for the basis o
- Page 43 and 44: CabinetParliamentSTPCSteering (andf
- Page 45 and 46: 5,04,0Billion euros3,02,01,00,083 8
- Page 47 and 48: The number of refereed articles is
- Page 49 and 50: Centre of expertisePaper industryBi
- Page 51 and 52: The Institute for Environmental Res
- Page 53: and systematic gradually progressin
- Page 57 and 58: Internal support units of HEIsThe F
- Page 59 and 60: of interviewed HEI staffs, the coop
- Page 61 and 62: areas of the region’s Centre of E
- Page 63 and 64: system of Jyväskylä and the HEIs
- Page 65 and 66: V CONTRIBUTION OF TEACHING AND LEAR
- Page 67 and 68: esources to establish new activitie
- Page 69 and 70: The main problem for the Finnish la
- Page 71 and 72: longer. 2.5% of the Jyväskylä Pol
- Page 73 and 74: activities. As a part of the new qu
- Page 75 and 76: education programmes consisting of
- Page 77 and 78: the TE-Centre of Central Finland an
- Page 79 and 80: practices in the provision of educa
- Page 81 and 82: Reason forskillupgradingDescription
- Page 83 and 84: Strengths+ HEIs are actively confro
- Page 85 and 86: taxation, to lower the unemployment
- Page 87 and 88: Box 6.2 The WIRE -projects: Support
- Page 89 and 90: indoor ice-skating rink, the Rauhal
- Page 91 and 92: The School of Cultural Studies at t
- Page 93 and 94: the number of registered customers
- Page 95 and 96: Box 6.9 Environmental management in
- Page 97 and 98: Strengths+ The significance of HEIs
- Page 99 and 100: eferring to the regional developmen
- Page 101 and 102: Key topics relating to changes in t
- Page 103 and 104: participation in the decision makin
- Page 105 and 106:
in the strategy-making process. The
- Page 107 and 108:
7.5 Critical points in promoting th
- Page 109 and 110:
7.Cooperation in strategies concern
- Page 111 and 112:
egion is according to national and
- Page 113 and 114:
oundaries for further developmental
- Page 115 and 116:
joining resources and operations by
- Page 117 and 118:
Discussion proposal 15: To ensure d
- Page 119 and 120:
achieved by the horizontal utilizat
- Page 121 and 122:
Appendix 2 Information on data used
- Page 123 and 124:
and finding synergy between the oth
- Page 125 and 126:
School of BusinessRoleThe School of
- Page 127 and 128:
The challenge of the school from re
- Page 129 and 130:
developing wellness and environment
- Page 131 and 132:
Faculty of EducationRoleThe Faculty
- Page 133 and 134:
and/or graduation thesis is a signi
- Page 135 and 136:
Areas of strength and prioritising
- Page 137 and 138:
Agora Center’s partners from the
- Page 139 and 140:
Currently the priority of ITRI’s
- Page 141 and 142:
Weak spots and areas to develop in
- Page 143 and 144:
Employment and Economic Development
- Page 145 and 146:
Appendix 3 Analysis of the most sig
- Page 147 and 148:
Appendix 4 Regional effects (input-
- Page 149 and 150:
The overall value of production cre
- Page 151 and 152:
Appendix 5 Reform of regional struc
- Page 153 and 154:
Appendix 7 Provision of education i
- Page 155 and 156:
Appendix 8 Statistical information
- Page 157 and 158:
Appendix 10 Statistics on financing
- Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 12 Labour market activity
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix 14 Master’s Programmes a
- Page 163 and 164:
Uusiutuvan energian tutkimusohjelma
- Page 165 and 166:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAcademy of Finland (200