Complete thesis - Murdoch University

Reeves T C (1994) “Evaluating what really matters in computer-based education”,http://www.medicine.mcgill.ca/ibroedu/review/Reeves Evaluating WhatReally Matters in Computer-Based Education.htmReeves T C (1997a) “Established and emerging evaluation paradigms for instructional design”,in Dills C R and Romiszowski A J (eds) “Instructional Development Paradigms”,Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Educational Technology Publications, pp 163–178Reeves T C (1997b) “A Model of the effective dimensions of interactive learningon the World Wide Web”, in Veteli J (ed) “Proceedings of InteraktiivinenTeknologia Koulutuksessa (ITK’97)”, Hameenlinna (Finland), pp 23–31,http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/Faculty/treeves/WebPaper.pdfReichardt C S and Cook T D (1979) “Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods”, inCook T and Reichardt C S (eds) “Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in EvaluationResearch”, Beverly Hills (CA): Sage, pp 7–32Reigeluth C M (1996) “A new paradigm for ISD?”, Educational Technology, 36(3), pp 13–20Reigeluth C M (1997) “Instructional theory, practitioner needs and new directions: somereflections”, Educational Technology, 37(1), pp 42–47Resnick L (ed) (1989) Knowing, Learning and Instruction: essays in honour of Robert Glaser,Hillsdale (NJ): ErlbaumRichardson J T E (1990) “Reliability and replicability of the Approaches to Studying questionnaire”,Studies in Higher Education, 15, pp 155–168Richey R C (1997) “Agenda-building and its implications for theory construction in instructionaltechnology”, Educational Technology, 37(1), pp 5–11Richie J and Spencer L (1994) “Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research”, inBryman A and Burgess R G (eds) “Analysing Qualitative Data”, London: Routledge, pp173–194Ridley D S, Schultz P A, Glanz R S and Weinstein E (1992) “Self-regulated learning: theinteractive influence of metacognitive awarenss and goal-setting”, Journal of ExperimentalEducation, 60(4), pp 293–306Rittel H J (1969) Reflections on the scientific and political significance of decision theory,Technical Report Working Paper 115, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Universityof California, Berkeley (CA)Rittel H J and Webber M M (1984) “Planning problems are wicked problems”, in Cross N(ed) “Developments in Design Methodology”, Chichester: Wiley, pp 135–144Robillard P N (1999) “The role of knowledge in software development”, Communications ofthe ACM, 42(1), pp 87–92Robillard P N (2005) “Opportunistic problem solving in Software Engineering”, IEEE Software,22(6), pp 60–67Robinson H (2001) “Reflecting on research and practice”, IEEE Software, 18(1), pp 110–112Robley W, Whittle S and Murdoch-Eaton D (2005) “Mapping generic skills curricula: outcomesand discussion”, Journal ofFurther and Higher Education, 29(4), pp 321–330Rogers P L (2002) “Teacher-Designers: how teachers use instructional design in real classrooms”,in Rogers P L (ed) “Designing Instruction for Technology-Enhanced Learning”,Hershey (PA): Idea Group, pp 1–17446