99implemented in a fair, transparent and non-discriminatory manner. Trade-relatedmeasures should only be used in exceptional circumstances, where othermeasures have proven unsuccessful to prevent, deter and eliminate <strong>IUU</strong> fishing,and only after prior consultation with interested States. Unilateral trade-relatedmeasures should be avoided.67. States should ensure that measures on international trade in fish andfishery products are transparent, based on scientific evidence, where applicable,and are in accordance with internationally agreed rules.68. States should cooperate, including through relevant global andregional fisheries management organizations, to adopt appropriate multilaterallyagreed trade-related measures, consistent with the WTO, that may be necessaryto prevent, deter and eliminate <strong>IUU</strong> fishing for specific fish stocks or species.Multilateral trade-related measures envisaged in regional fisheries managementorganizations may be used to support cooperative efforts to ensure that trade inspecific fish and fish products does not in any way encourage <strong>IUU</strong> fishing orotherwise undermine the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> conservation and managementmeasures which are consistent with the 1982 UN Convention.69. Trade-related measures to reduce or eliminate trade in fish and fishproducts derived from <strong>IUU</strong> fishing could include the adoption <strong>of</strong> multilateralcatch documentation and certification requirements, as well as other appropriatemultilaterally-agreed measures such as import and export controls orprohibitions. Such measures should be adopted in a fair, transparent and nondiscriminatorymanner. When such measures are adopted, States should supporttheir consistent and effective implementation.70. Stock or species-specific trade-related measures may be necessary toreduce or eliminate the economic incentive for vessels to engage in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing.71. States should take steps to improve the transparency <strong>of</strong> their marketsto allow the traceability <strong>of</strong> fish or fish products.72. States, when requested by an interested State, should assist any Statein deterring trade in fish and fish products illegally harvested in its jurisdiction.Assistance should be given in accordance with terms agreed by both States andfully respecting the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the State requesting assistance.73. States should take measures to ensure that their importers,transshippers, buyers, consumers, equipment suppliers, bankers, insurers, otherservices suppliers and the public are aware <strong>of</strong> the detrimental effects <strong>of</strong> doingbusiness with vessels identified as engaged in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing, whether by the Stateunder whose jurisdiction the vessel is operating or by the relevant regionalfisheries management organizations in accordance with its agreed procedures,
100and should consider measures to deter such business. Such measures couldinclude, to the extent possible under national law, legislation that makes it aviolation to conduct such business or to trade in fish or fish products derivedfrom <strong>IUU</strong> fishing. All identifications <strong>of</strong> vessels engaged in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing shouldbe made in a fair, transparent and non-discriminatory manner.74. States should take measures to ensure that their fishers are aware <strong>of</strong>the detrimental effects <strong>of</strong> doing business with importers, transshippers, buyers,consumers, equipment suppliers, bankers, insurers and other services suppliersidentified as doing business with vessels identified as engaged in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing,whether by the State under whose jurisdiction the vessel is operating or by therelevant regional fisheries management organization in accordance with itsagreed procedures, and should consider measures to deter such business. Suchmeasures could include, to the extent possible under national law, legislation thatmakes it a violation to conduct such business or to trade in fish or fish productsderived from <strong>IUU</strong> fishing. All identifications <strong>of</strong> vessels engaged in <strong>IUU</strong> fishingshould be made in a fair, transparent and non-discriminatory manner.75. States should work towards using the Harmonized CommodityDescription and Coding System for fish and fisheries products in order to helppromote the implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IPOA</strong>.76. Certification and documentation requirements should be standardizedto the extent feasible, and electronic schemes developed where possible, toensure their effectiveness, reduce opportunities for fraud, and avoid unnecessaryburdens on trade.RESEARCH77. States should encourage scientific research on methods <strong>of</strong> identifyingfish species from samples <strong>of</strong> processed products. FAO should facilitate theestablishment <strong>of</strong> a network <strong>of</strong> databases <strong>of</strong> genetic and other markers used toidentify fish species from processed product, including the ability to identify thestock <strong>of</strong> origin where possible.REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS78. States should ensure compliance with and enforcement <strong>of</strong> policies andmeasures having a bearing on <strong>IUU</strong> fishing which are adopted by any relevantregional fisheries management organization and by which they are bound. Statesshould cooperate in the establishment <strong>of</strong> such organizations in regions wherenone currently exist.79. As the cooperation <strong>of</strong> all relevant States is important for the success <strong>of</strong>measures taken by relevant regional fisheries management organizations toprevent, deter and eliminate <strong>IUU</strong> fishing, States which are not members <strong>of</strong> arelevant regional fisheries management organization are not discharged from
- Page 4 and 5:
iiiPREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENTThe
- Page 6 and 7:
vThe IPOA-IUU is voluntary. However
- Page 8 and 9:
viii6.2 Examples of some port State
- Page 10 and 11:
xiBACKGROUND1. From ancient times,
- Page 12 and 13:
xiii11. The Code is voluntary. Howe
- Page 14 and 15:
1. INTERNATIONAL PLAN OF ACTION - I
- Page 16 and 17:
3Since the late 1990s, a number of
- Page 18 and 19:
5(1) conducted by national or forei
- Page 20 and 21:
7flag States, coastal States and Po
- Page 22 and 23:
9In light of this, the very first
- Page 24 and 25:
11the vessels rarely if ever visit
- Page 26 and 27:
13For example, Japan requires its n
- Page 28 and 29:
15IUU fishing on the high seas. 27
- Page 30 and 31:
17end all forms of government econo
- Page 32 and 33:
19developing States, 36 have introd
- Page 34 and 35:
21If the vessel is fishing on the h
- Page 36 and 37:
23registering a vessel that has a h
- Page 38 and 39:
25RFMOs have a role to play in ensu
- Page 40 and 41:
27FAO, in turn, will make available
- Page 42 and 43:
29species can be caught, what gear
- Page 44 and 45:
31Flag States are also encouraged t
- Page 46 and 47:
33cases, fishing vessels registered
- Page 48:
35light of this, paragraph 51 of th
- Page 51 and 52:
38transshipment at sea is prohibite
- Page 53 and 54:
40supported IUU fishing. For exampl
- Page 55 and 56:
42Japan prohibits port calls by tun
- Page 57 and 58:
44of a NAFO member, it must be insp
- Page 59 and 60:
46discussed in Section 7 of these g
- Page 61 and 62: 48products harvested through IUU fi
- Page 63 and 64: 50products. On the basis of that da
- Page 65 and 66: 52question, while the latter only c
- Page 67 and 68: 54States can also combat IUU fishin
- Page 69 and 70: 56RFMOs engage in IUU fishing. No s
- Page 71 and 72: 588.3 Possibilities for Further Act
- Page 73 and 74: 60resolutions calling on those memb
- Page 75 and 76: 62landings, port control, and inspe
- Page 77 and 78: 648.3.8 Actions in Response to Rema
- Page 79 and 80: 66As a result, IUU fishers often co
- Page 81 and 82: 68A number of other developed State
- Page 83 and 84: 702.4 Measures to control transport
- Page 85 and 86: 10.3 Suggested Format for Reports t
- Page 87 and 88: 74Flag States should closely contro
- Page 89 and 90: 76A coastal State should consider r
- Page 91 and 92: 78To assist States in implementing
- Page 93 and 94: 12. LITERATURE CITED80Agnew, D.J. 2
- Page 95 and 96: 82Greenpeace. 2001. Pirate Fishing:
- Page 97 and 98: 84II. NATURE AND SCOPE OF IUU FISHI
- Page 99 and 100: 86to the Conservation and Managemen
- Page 101 and 102: National Legislation88Legislation16
- Page 103 and 104: 90National Plans of Action25. State
- Page 105 and 106: 9236.2 having taken into account al
- Page 107 and 108: 9446.3 the species, fishing gear au
- Page 109 and 110: 9651.2 cooperation and exchange of
- Page 111: 98general operating guidelines for
- Page 115 and 116: 10280.9 development of observer pro
- Page 117 and 118: 10486.3 the strengthening of region
- Page 119 and 120: 106Articles V, VI, and VII of the A
- Page 121 and 122: 1084.2 To the greatest extent pract
- Page 123 and 124: 110• Compliance with other aspect
- Page 125 and 126: 1126. Information regarding such si
- Page 127 and 128: 114Annex ACommon English Name Scien
- Page 129 and 130: 1164. Parties shall consider and ac
- Page 131 and 132: 118Committed to take steps, consist
- Page 133 and 134: 1209. An export-validated Dissostic
- Page 135: 122APPENDIX VIWEBSITES OF SELECTED