11.07.2015 Views

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> other States sufficient to prevent, deter andeliminate <strong>IUU</strong> fishing by those vessels? Do your laws, regulationsand practices provide an adequate basis for monitoring such fishingactivity on the high seas, for apprehending <strong>IUU</strong> fishers and forimposing penalties on them?For coastal States, are the laws, regulations and practices relating t<strong>of</strong>ishing by vessels in areas under your jurisdiction sufficient toprevent, deter and eliminate <strong>IUU</strong> fishing by those vessels? If youallow foreign vessels to fish in areas under your jurisdiction, do theagreements providing for such access need to be strengthened toaddress problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>IUU</strong> fishing?For port States, are your laws, regulations and practices relating tothe landings or transshipment <strong>of</strong> fish in your ports sufficient toensure that such fish are not the product <strong>of</strong> <strong>IUU</strong> fishing?For States involved in international trade in fish and fisheryproducts, are your laws, regulations and practices sufficient toimplement internationally agreed market-related measures designedto prevent, deter and eliminate <strong>IUU</strong> fishing? 183.2.2 State Control over NationalsOne reason why <strong>IUU</strong> fishing has been such a persistent problem is thatmany States have not been successful in controlling the fishing activities by theirnationals. Admittedly, it may be difficult for many States to control, or even tobe aware <strong>of</strong>, activities <strong>of</strong> their nationals that take place in the territory <strong>of</strong> otherStates or aboard vessels registered in other States. States may also have difficultyin preventing their nationals from reflagging fishing vessels in other States withthe intent to engage in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing.The <strong>IPOA</strong>-<strong>IUU</strong> nevertheless calls on all States to take measures orcooperate to ensure that their nationals do not support or engage in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing.In particular, all States should cooperate to identify those nationals who are theoperators or beneficial owners <strong>of</strong> vessels involved in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing.Under international law, a State is free to enact laws prohibiting itsnationals from engaging in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing, even if the activity in question takesplace aboard a foreign vessel or in waters under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> anotherState. 19 Some States have already done so.18 For suggestions on the enactment <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> legislation relating to <strong>IUU</strong> fishing,see “Legislating for Sustainable Fisheries: A Guide to Implementing the 1993 FAOCompliance Agreement and 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement,” by William Edeson,David Freestone, and Elly Gudmundsdottir.19 For further discussion, see “Tools to Address <strong>IUU</strong> Fishing: The Current LegalSituation,” by William Edeson.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!