Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network
Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network
Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
20proprietary data. By doing so, fisheries managers and enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials aremore likely to receive the cooperation <strong>of</strong> law-abiding fishers, who have goodreason to help combat <strong>IUU</strong> fishing.The specific <strong>MCS</strong> tools contained in the <strong>IPOA</strong>-<strong>IUU</strong> are discussed morethoroughly below in the sections dealing with flag States, port States, coastalStates and RFMOs.3.3 Cooperation between StatesCooperation among States is absolutely necessary if <strong>IUU</strong> fishing is tobe prevented, for several reasons:Vessels engaged in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing <strong>of</strong>ten move in and out <strong>of</strong> areasunder the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> multiple States, and operate on the highseas as well. In such cases, the States involved must cooperate in<strong>MCS</strong> efforts.As noted above, the owners and operators <strong>of</strong> <strong>IUU</strong> fishing vesselstypically have nationalities that differ from those <strong>of</strong> the vesselsthemselves. Again, cooperation among the States involved isnecessary to determine the identities <strong>of</strong> those who control the <strong>IUU</strong>fishing operations and to impose penalties on them.A large percentage <strong>of</strong> fish harvested through <strong>IUU</strong> fishing are putinto international trade, making cooperation between exporting andimporting States necessary to deny market access to these products.Paragraphs 28-31 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IPOA</strong>-<strong>IUU</strong> set forth a number <strong>of</strong> ways in whichStates should cooperate to prevent, deter and eliminate <strong>IUU</strong> fishing, includingthrough their participation in RFMOs. Of primary importance is the sharing <strong>of</strong>relevant information and the provision <strong>of</strong> assistance to developing States. Inorder to facilitate cooperation, the <strong>IPOA</strong>-<strong>IUU</strong> calls on each State to appoint aninitial “point <strong>of</strong> contact” and to make this appointment known to all. Possibleways to publicize the appointment <strong>of</strong> such points <strong>of</strong> contact would be to post therelevant names on the websites <strong>of</strong> national fishery administrations and to includethem in reports to FAO on implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>IPOA</strong>-<strong>IUU</strong>.4. FLAG STATE RESPONSIBILITIESThe flag State has responsibility under international law for controllingthe fishing activities <strong>of</strong> a vessel, no matter where the vessel operates:If the vessel is fishing in waters under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the flagState, the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the flag State is exclusive. Generallyspeaking, no other State has the right or responsibility to control thefishing activities <strong>of</strong> the vessel.