11.07.2015 Views

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2fisheries, <strong>IUU</strong> fishing accounts for up to 30 percent <strong>of</strong> total catches and in atleast one case possibly much more. 2 For example, the Indian Ocean TunaCommission (IOTC) recently indicated that at least 70,000 tons <strong>of</strong> tuna catchesby large longline vessels go unreported each year in the Indian Ocean. 3 The<strong>International</strong> Commission for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)estimated in 1999 that unreported catches represent about 10 percent <strong>of</strong> overallcatches <strong>of</strong> the major Atlantic tuna species (bluefin, swordfish and bigeye) andthat misreporting <strong>of</strong> catches by some ICCAT members is also suspected. 4 TheCommission for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Antarctic Marine Living Resources(CCAMLR) indicated in 1999 its extreme concern about the high level <strong>of</strong> <strong>IUU</strong>fishing for toothfish (Dissostichus spp.) in its Convention Area, 5 a concern thathas been echoed by the <strong>International</strong> Tribunal for the Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea.Moreover, available information strongly suggests that, despite apparentimprovement in some regional situations, the amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>IUU</strong> fishing world-wideis increasing, as <strong>IUU</strong> fishers seek to avoid compliance with stricter fishingregulations that are being imposed to deal with downturns in a growing number<strong>of</strong> fish stocks. While some estimates suggest that <strong>IUU</strong> fishing may account for asmuch as one quarter <strong>of</strong> total catch in the world’s oceans, fully reliable data on<strong>IUU</strong> fishing are unfortunately scarce.2 See SOFIA 2000, p. 57.3 Report <strong>of</strong> the Second Meeting <strong>of</strong> FAO and Non-FAO Regional Fishery Bodies orArrangements, p. 7. See also IOTC Resolution 00/01, indicating that “70 percent <strong>of</strong> datafrom longline operations [in that region] are still not reported to IOTC.”4 However, due presumably to a number <strong>of</strong> measures adopted by ICCAT in recent years tocombat <strong>IUU</strong> fishing, which are described in later sections <strong>of</strong> these guidelines, ICCATestimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>IUU</strong> fishing levels for at least bluefin tuna and bigeye tuna have decreased in1999/2000, compared to previous years.5 CCAMLR estimates for 1999/2000 show a decrease in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing for toothfish fromprevious years, but it remains quite high, at more than 8,000 tons <strong>of</strong> landings (greenweight). The high market value <strong>of</strong> toothfish has made this species a prime target for <strong>IUU</strong>fishing. CCAMLR members see this issue as the greatest challenge currently facing theCommission. The continuation <strong>of</strong> <strong>IUU</strong> fishing could reduce toothfish stocks to levelsfrom which they cannot recover. Also, the incidental mortality <strong>of</strong> seabirds caused by thoseinvolved in <strong>IUU</strong> fishing is threatening to drive to extinction a number <strong>of</strong> species,specifically petrels and albatrosses. For further information, see “The Illegal andUnregulated Fishery for Toothfish in the Southern Ocean, and the CCAMLR CatchDocumentation Scheme,” by D.J. Agnew.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!