11.07.2015 Views

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

Implementation of IPOA/IUU - International MCS Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

41jurisdiction as a coastal State to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute andpenalize those responsible for the <strong>IUU</strong> fishing.Even where the suspected <strong>IUU</strong> fishing may have taken place in watersbeyond the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the port State, the port State may take action againstthe vessel and its operators with the consent <strong>of</strong>, or at the request <strong>of</strong>, the flagState.As the use <strong>of</strong> port State controls do not necessarily entail significantresources, they represent a promising avenue for implementation by developingStates. During port visits, enforcement <strong>of</strong>ficials should, at the very least, boardthe vessels, examine their logbooks and collect other relevant information. Thiswould not entail enormous financial costs but would require some training inboarding and inspection techniques. This could be a useful focus for assistance todeveloping States, discussed further in Section 9 <strong>of</strong> these guidelines.6.2 Examples <strong>of</strong> some Port State Measures in Use 70Measures Adopted by Individual States.Canada generally denies port access to vessels that undermineconservation measures by fishing contrary to conservation regimes establishedby RFMOs <strong>of</strong> which Canada is a member. 71The European Union instructs its port authorities to allow vessels fromnon-EU States to <strong>of</strong>fload fish that were caught on the high seas only if they havebeen satisfied that the fish have been caught outside the regulatory areas <strong>of</strong> anycompetent RFMO <strong>of</strong> which the European Community is a member, or that thefish have been caught in compliance with conservation and managementmeasures adopted by the RFMO <strong>of</strong> which the Community is a member. 72Icelandic legislation bans the landing, transshipment and selling <strong>of</strong>catch in Icelandic ports from a foreign fishing vessel that has violatedagreements on utilization and preservation <strong>of</strong> living marine resources to whichIceland is a party. Such vessels may not be provided with services within theIcelandic EEZ nor from Icelandic ports. 7370 Much <strong>of</strong> the information in this subsection is drawn from T. Lobach, supra note 34.71 See Coastal Fisheries Protection Act (R.S.C. 1970, c.C.21) Sections 3 and 4, andCoastal Fisheries Protection Regulations (C.R.C., 1978, c. 413), Section 5.72 See EU Control Regulation 2847/93, as amended.73 See Article 3 <strong>of</strong> Act No 228 April 1998 concerning fishing and processing by foreignvessels in Iceland’s exclusive fishing zone.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!