11.07.2015 Views

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

approach to estimate soil water c<strong>on</strong>tent from <strong>the</strong>rmalinertia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149, 1693-1698Wang, J.F., & Bras, R.L. (2011). A model <strong>of</strong>evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> maximumentropy producti<strong>on</strong>. Water Resources Research, 47 Xue, Y., &Cracknell, A.P. (1995). Adavanced <strong>the</strong>rmal inertia modeling.Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Remote</strong> <strong>Sensing</strong>, 16, 431-446Négrel, JeanRiver surface roughness sensitivity to windc<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s : in situ measurement technique,processing method and resultsNégrel, Jean 1 ; Kosuth, Pascal 1 ; Caulliez, Guillemette 2 ;Strauss, Olivier 3 ; Borderies, Pierre 4 ; Lalaurie, Jean-Claude 5 ;Fjort<strong>of</strong>t, Roger 51. UMR TETIS, IRSTEA, M<strong>on</strong>tpellier, France2. IRPHE, CNRS, Marseille, France3. LIRMM, Université M<strong>on</strong>tpellier 2, M<strong>on</strong>tpellier, France4. DEMR, ONERA, Toulouse, France5. DCT/SI/AR, CNES, Toulouse, FranceWater surface roughness str<strong>on</strong>gly impacts microwavebackscattering process over rivers. Therefore, developpingradar interferometry techniques over c<strong>on</strong>tinental waters todetermine river slope (cross-track interferometry) or surfacevelocity (al<strong>on</strong>g-track interferometry) requires a detailedcharacterizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> water surface roughness, its relati<strong>on</strong> withriver flow and wind c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, its influence <strong>on</strong> backscattercoefficient. In situ measurement <strong>of</strong> river surface roughness isa complex task as surface topography is rapidly changingand sensitive to obstacles or c<strong>on</strong>tact measurements.Laboratory measurements, although highly informative, fallshort to represent <strong>the</strong> diversity <strong>of</strong> river flow and windc<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. In <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SWOT missi<strong>on</strong>preparatory phase, a method was developped for fieldmeasurement <strong>of</strong> river surface roughness. It was tested andvalidated in laboratory c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, and implemented innatural c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rhône river, under various windintensities. The method is based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> acquisiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> waterpressure time series by a network <strong>of</strong> immersed pressuresensors, with synchr<strong>on</strong>ized 10 Hz sampling and 0,1 mbaraccuracy (1mm water elevati<strong>on</strong>). A preliminary low frequencyfiltering is applied to each sensor pressure time series toremove water level trends. Mean depth h, frequencyspectrum, dominant frequency f and standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>water pressure Pare determined per time interval (180s). Amultisensor analysis is realised to determine directi<strong>on</strong>al wavecelerity c and directi<strong>on</strong>al correlati<strong>on</strong> length L corr. Finallystandard deviati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> surface water level Zis determined foreach sensor by applying a correcti<strong>on</strong> factor, taking intoaccount <strong>the</strong> signal damping with depth. Z=e 2.pi.h.f/c . P(h)Laboratory tests validated <strong>the</strong> measurement technique,provided that <strong>the</strong> correcti<strong>on</strong> factor does not exceed 10 (i.e.<strong>the</strong> immersed sensor records more than 10% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surfacesignal) which is achievable by limiting <strong>the</strong> sensor depth.Field measurements were realised during a campaign <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>Rhône river (may 2011). The sensor network was located10m from <strong>the</strong> river bank and 0,15m under <strong>the</strong> surface water.It recorded during 7 hours at 10 Hz. Wind measured at 2mheight had <strong>the</strong> same directi<strong>on</strong> as river flow (southward),with intensity changing progressively from 8m/s to 0m/s.Surface roughness was characterized, per 3 minute timeintervals, by Frequency spectrum, dominant frequency,standard deviati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> surface water level Z, directi<strong>on</strong>al wavecelerity c and directi<strong>on</strong>al correlati<strong>on</strong> distance L corr. Itssensitivity to wind c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s was analysed and modelled.The method is currently being adapted <strong>on</strong> a floating supportfor intensive river surface roughness measurement.Njoku, Eni G.Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Missi<strong>on</strong>Science and Data Product DevelopmentNjoku, Eni G. 1 ; Entekhabi, Dara 2 ; O’Neill, Peggy E. 3 ;Jacks<strong>on</strong>, Thomas J. 41. Jet Propulsi<strong>on</strong> Laboratory, California Institute <strong>of</strong>Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA2. Massachusetts Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Cambridge, MA,USA3. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA4. USDA ARS Hydrology and <strong>Remote</strong> <strong>Sensing</strong> Laboratory,Beltsville, MD, USAThe Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) missi<strong>on</strong>,planned for launch in late 2014, has <strong>the</strong> objective <strong>of</strong>frequent, global mapping <strong>of</strong> near-surface soil moisture andits freeze/thaw state. The SMAP measurement systemutilizes an L-band radar and radiometer sharing a rotating 6-meter mesh reflector antenna. The instruments will operate<strong>on</strong> a spacecraft in a 685-km polar orbit with 6 am/6 pmnodal crossings, viewing <strong>the</strong> surface at a c<strong>on</strong>stant 40-degreeincidence angle with a 1000-km swath width, providing 3-day global coverage. Data from <strong>the</strong> instruments will yieldglobal maps <strong>of</strong> soil moisture and freeze/thaw state at 10 kmand 3 km resoluti<strong>on</strong>s, respectively, every two to three days.The 10-km soil moisture product will be generated using acombined radar and radiometer retrieval algorithm. SMAPwill also provide a radiometer-<strong>on</strong>ly soil moisture product at40-km spatial resoluti<strong>on</strong> and a radar-<strong>on</strong>ly soil moistureproduct at 3-km resoluti<strong>on</strong>. The relative accuracies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>seproducts will vary regi<strong>on</strong>ally and will depend <strong>on</strong> surfacecharacteristics such as vegetati<strong>on</strong> water c<strong>on</strong>tent, vegetati<strong>on</strong>type, surface roughness, and landscape heterogeneity. TheSMAP soil moisture and freeze/thaw measurements willenable significantly improved estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluxes <strong>of</strong>water, energy and carb<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> land and atmosphere.Soil moisture and freeze/thaw c<strong>on</strong>trols <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fluxes arekey factors in <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> models used for wea<strong>the</strong>rand climate predicti<strong>on</strong>s and for quantifying <strong>the</strong> global111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!