11.07.2015 Views

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>on</strong> carb<strong>on</strong> NPP, and informati<strong>on</strong> about NPPprovides significant c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> partiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> ET intotranspirati<strong>on</strong> and soil evaporati<strong>on</strong>. We present recent work<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Australian water and carb<strong>on</strong> cycles in which a model(CABLE-SLI-CASAcnp) is c<strong>on</strong>strained jointly withobservati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> streamflow from several hundred gaugedcatchments, eddy flux measurements <strong>of</strong> ET and NEE (netecosystem exchange <strong>of</strong> carb<strong>on</strong>), remotely sensed data <strong>on</strong>vegetati<strong>on</strong> state, and data <strong>on</strong> carb<strong>on</strong> pools (both in-situ andremotely sensed). As well as yielding a c<strong>on</strong>sistent picture <strong>of</strong>water and carb<strong>on</strong> exchanges, <strong>the</strong>se joint c<strong>on</strong>straints suggestthat <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Australian c<strong>on</strong>tinent, a predominantly semi-aridregi<strong>on</strong>, over half <strong>the</strong> water loss through ET occurs throughsoil evaporati<strong>on</strong> and bypasses plants entirely. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, againat regi<strong>on</strong>al scale, human forcings <strong>of</strong> carb<strong>on</strong> and water cyclespropagate into each o<strong>the</strong>r, and both are affected by largescaleclimate forcing. This is a questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> dynamics ra<strong>the</strong>rthan informatics. One manifestati<strong>on</strong> is <strong>the</strong> joint resp<strong>on</strong>se <strong>of</strong>run<strong>of</strong>f to warming, CO2 increase and precipitati<strong>on</strong> changes.We use sensitivity tests with <strong>the</strong> CABLE-SLI-CASAcnp modelto explore this questi<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong> Australian c<strong>on</strong>tinent.Reager, John T.Effective global soil parameters from GRACE andimpact <strong>on</strong> land surface simulati<strong>on</strong>sReager, John T. 1 ; Lo, MInhui 2 ; Blum, David 2 ; Famiglietti,James 1, 2 ; Rodell, Mat<strong>the</strong>w 31. Earth Systems Science, University California, Irvine,Irvine, CA, USA2. UC Center for Hydrological Modeling, Irvine, CA, USA3. NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, USAEffective values <strong>of</strong> soil depth and soil water holdingcapacity are critical hydrological variables in land surfacemodels. In global-scale simulati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>se spatially variableparameters are <strong>of</strong>ten poorly represented due to observati<strong>on</strong>aland scaling limitati<strong>on</strong>s. Some parameters, such as porosity,matric potential and soil c<strong>on</strong>ductivity, are based empirically<strong>on</strong> two-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al maps <strong>of</strong> soil types. O<strong>the</strong>r critical soilcharacteristics however, such as soil layering and depth tobedrock, are assumed to be homogeneous in space, imposingan unrealistic c<strong>on</strong>straint <strong>on</strong> climate model estimates <strong>of</strong>groundwater recharge and water storage in unc<strong>on</strong>finedaquifers, limiting <strong>the</strong> reliability <strong>of</strong> projecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> future wateravailability. GRACE observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> terrestrial water storageanomaly are well-suited for estimating <strong>the</strong> effective range <strong>of</strong>such land surface model parameters as soil depth and waterholding capacity, based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> spatial variability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>storage signal. Here we combine GRACE storageobservati<strong>on</strong>s with GLDAS output for surface, canopy andsnow water, to derive a 1-degree spatially variable sub-surfaceactive water holding capacity. We use this result with globalestimates <strong>of</strong> porosity from <strong>the</strong> FAO Harm<strong>on</strong>ized SoilDatabase to produce an effective 1-degree global active soillayer depth. The calculated depth and water holding capacityvariables can be introduced directly into a model, or used toderive o<strong>the</strong>r model parameters. In this study, we evaluate <strong>the</strong>sensitivity <strong>of</strong> numerical simulati<strong>on</strong>s to realistic waterholding capacity by incorporating our new estimates into<strong>the</strong> CLM. Impacts <strong>on</strong> evaporati<strong>on</strong> and surface radiati<strong>on</strong> in<strong>of</strong>fline simulati<strong>on</strong>s and improvements to simulatedterrestrial hydroclimatology are discussed.Reeves, JessicaUncertainty in InSAR deformati<strong>on</strong> measurementsfor estimating hydraulic head in <strong>the</strong> San Luis Valley,ColoradoReeves, Jessica 1 ; Knight, Rosemary 1 ; Zebker, Howard 11. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USAThe San Luis Valley (SLV) is an 8000 km2 regi<strong>on</strong> insou<strong>the</strong>rn Colorado that is home to a thriving agriculturalec<strong>on</strong>omy. The valley is currently in a period <strong>of</strong> extremedrought, with county and state regulators facing <strong>the</strong>challenge <strong>of</strong> developing appropriate management policiesfor both surface water and ground water supplies.Legislati<strong>on</strong> passed in 2004 requires that hydraulic head levelswithin <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>fined aquifer system stay within <strong>the</strong> rangeexperienced in <strong>the</strong> years 1978 - 2000. While somemeasurements <strong>of</strong> hydraulic head exist, greater spatial andtemporal sampling would be very valuable in understanding<strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>fined aquifer system. Interferometricsyn<strong>the</strong>tic aperture radar (InSAR) data provide spatially densemaps <strong>of</strong> surface deformati<strong>on</strong>, with <strong>on</strong>e pixel representing <strong>the</strong>time series deformati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a 50 m by 50 m area <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ground. Our l<strong>on</strong>g-term goal is to use <strong>the</strong>se deformati<strong>on</strong> timeseries to estimate hydraulic head. Here we present <strong>the</strong>analysis <strong>of</strong> InSAR data from <strong>the</strong> European Space Agency’sERS-1 and ERS-2 satellites, using 31 acquisiti<strong>on</strong>s archivedfrom 1992 - 2001. We applied small baseline subset (SBAS)analysis to create a time series <strong>of</strong> deformati<strong>on</strong> that issampled at <strong>the</strong> 31 acquisiti<strong>on</strong> times. We find that <strong>the</strong>seas<strong>on</strong>al deformati<strong>on</strong> measured by InSAR mimics hydraulichead measurements made in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>fined aquifer system.These measurements can be used to inform groundwatermanagers about <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> groundwater system.However, at present little work has been d<strong>on</strong>e to quantify <strong>the</strong>uncertainty associated with InSAR image sequences <strong>of</strong>aquifers. We have quantified <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> InSARdeformati<strong>on</strong> measurement that is caused by <strong>the</strong>decorrelati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two SAR signals. The correlati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>SAR signals is affected by: <strong>the</strong> local surface slope, <strong>the</strong>properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface, <strong>the</strong> time between two acquisiti<strong>on</strong>sand <strong>the</strong> change in satellite positi<strong>on</strong> between twoacquisiti<strong>on</strong>s. We first quantified <strong>the</strong> variance and covariance<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interferometric phase for all interferograms. We <strong>the</strong>npropagated this uncertainty through <strong>the</strong> SBAS processingchain to produce <strong>the</strong> variance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> final estimates <strong>of</strong>deformati<strong>on</strong>. We have shown that <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in <strong>the</strong>deformati<strong>on</strong> estimated at each acquisiti<strong>on</strong> time depends <strong>on</strong>a) <strong>the</strong> correlati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SAR signals throughout time, andb) <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> interferograms used to estimate <strong>the</strong>deformati<strong>on</strong> at a given acquisiti<strong>on</strong> time. This understanding<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> InSAR measurement will allow usto rigorously assess how InSAR data can best be used to122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!