11.07.2015 Views

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vanderjagt, Benjamin J.How sub-pixel snow depth, vegetati<strong>on</strong>, and grainsize variability affect <strong>the</strong> ability to estimate largescaleSWE from microwave measurements in alpineareasVanderjagt, Benjamin J. 1 ; Durand, Michael 1 ; Margulis, Steve 2 ;Kim, Ed 3 ; Molotch, Noah 41. Ohio State, Columbus, OH, USA2. University <strong>of</strong> California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA,USA3. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA4. University <strong>of</strong> Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USACurrent methods to retrieve snow water equivalent(SWE) using passive microwave (PM) remote sensingmeasurements are <strong>of</strong>ten characterized by large uncertaintieswhich result from <strong>the</strong> natural heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> snowpackand vegetati<strong>on</strong> within <strong>the</strong> microwave footprint. Snowpackheterogeneities include snow grain size, snow depth, andlayering <strong>of</strong> snowpack. Vegetati<strong>on</strong> height, needle or leafdensity, and species also vary within microwave footprints. Itis not currently understood <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> passivemicrowave measurement is sensitive (or insensitive) to SWE(as well as to <strong>the</strong> different variables listed above), as afuncti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microwave measurement. In ourinvestigati<strong>on</strong>, we utilized <strong>the</strong> multi-scale Cold LandProcesses Experiment dataset for in situ and microwavedatasets. In order to better characterize <strong>the</strong> effect thatvariability in <strong>the</strong> snowpack and vegetative states has <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>microwave observati<strong>on</strong> as functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> scale, we c<strong>on</strong>ductanalysis in two different ways. 1) First, we estimate what weexpect <strong>the</strong> observed radiances (brightness temperature) to beat specific locati<strong>on</strong>s, based <strong>on</strong> in situ and LiDAR derivedsnow data ga<strong>the</strong>red from those same locati<strong>on</strong>s, using aradiative transfer model (RTM). We <strong>the</strong>n compare ourestimated radiances to <strong>the</strong> actual observed radiances, andcharacterize <strong>the</strong> errors, as a functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>different snowpack and vegetative properties. 2) Based <strong>on</strong><strong>the</strong> “real” variability <strong>of</strong> snow and vegetative states, we willcreate syn<strong>the</strong>tic observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> microwave brightnesstemperatures, and perturb <strong>the</strong> different snowpack andvegetative properties in order to examine <strong>the</strong> extent to which<strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>tic microwave signal is affected by each individualproperty, at differing scales. Based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>tic analysisdescribed above, <strong>the</strong>re still exists sensitivity to <strong>the</strong> meansnow depth within microwave footprints, even with highlyheterogeneous alpine snowpack and snow grain exp<strong>on</strong>entialcorrelati<strong>on</strong> lengths ranging from 0.05-0.3 millimeters.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, we find that <strong>the</strong> modeled microwave signal issensitive to <strong>the</strong> mean snow depth even as we aggregate tolarger scales. We also characterize <strong>the</strong> effect to whichvegetati<strong>on</strong> attenuates <strong>the</strong> microwave observati<strong>on</strong>, as afuncti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest cover c<strong>on</strong>tained within <strong>the</strong> PMfootprint. We find that even relatively little forest coverwithin <strong>the</strong> subpixel (> 15%) can increase <strong>the</strong> microwavemeasurement by up to 10 K, as well as reduce <strong>the</strong> signal-t<strong>on</strong>oiseratio between <strong>the</strong> microwave measurements and <strong>the</strong>SWE. While <strong>the</strong> increase in brightness temperature can inprinciple be accounted for in SWE retrieval algorithms, <strong>the</strong>decrease in signal-to-noise ratio results in a loss <strong>of</strong>informati<strong>on</strong> about SWE. The primary research advance thatwe expect from our work is a fundamental understanding <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> sensitivity (or lack <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passive microwaveobservati<strong>on</strong> to spatial average SWE as a functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microwave measurement. Limiting cases, such as <strong>the</strong>threshold vegetati<strong>on</strong> cover fracti<strong>on</strong> at which SWE is nol<strong>on</strong>ger retrievable are discussed.Varhola, AndrésCombining Coordinate-Transformed AirborneLiDAR and LANDSAT Indices to Obtain ForestStructure Metrics Relevant to DistributedHydrologic ModelingVarhola, Andrés 1 ; Coops, Nicholas C. 11. University <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaCurrent remote sensing technologies are not yet capable<strong>of</strong> directly and reliably measuring snow water equivalent atspatial and temporal resoluti<strong>on</strong>s adequate for <strong>the</strong> estimati<strong>on</strong><strong>of</strong> streamflow and flood risk in snow-dominatedcatchments. Hydrologists <strong>the</strong>refore depend <strong>on</strong> detailedprocess-based hydrologic models to simulate snowaccumulati<strong>on</strong> and depleti<strong>on</strong> patterns, which are in turnhighly affected by <strong>the</strong> presence and structure <strong>of</strong> vegetati<strong>on</strong>.However, <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> spatially-explicit and relevant foreststructure metrics needed to parameterize <strong>the</strong>se models overlarge basins has led to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> oversimplifiedrepresentati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous forested landscapes,introducing additi<strong>on</strong>al uncertainties to predicti<strong>on</strong>s. One keyremote sensing technology that has dem<strong>on</strong>stratedsignificant potential for measuring forest structure is LightDetecti<strong>on</strong> and Ranging (LiDAR). As airborne LiDARbecomes more available across larger areas, its use as a driver<strong>of</strong> vegetati<strong>on</strong> structure for hydrologic models has alsobecome increasingly important. Traditi<strong>on</strong>al hydrologicmodels require four vegetati<strong>on</strong> structure metrics —leaf areaindex (LAI), sky-view factor (SVF), canopy cover and height—to simulate processes related to radiati<strong>on</strong> fluxes, windattenuati<strong>on</strong>, snow or rain intercepti<strong>on</strong> andevapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>. In this study we developed a novelmethodology with two objectives: a) derive <strong>the</strong>se fourstructural metrics at <strong>the</strong> tree and plot levels using a LiDARdataset, and b) explore <strong>the</strong>ir relati<strong>on</strong>ships with Landsatderivedvegetati<strong>on</strong> and foliar moisture indices forextrapolati<strong>on</strong> purposes. To achieve this we projected LiDARreturns into a polar coordinate system to generate syn<strong>the</strong>tichemispherical images that directly provided LAI and SVFwhen calibrated with <strong>the</strong>ir field-based optical counterparts,whereas canopy cover and height were accurately obtainedfrom LiDAR without coordinate transformati<strong>on</strong>. Themethod allowed <strong>the</strong> retrieval <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se metrics at any locati<strong>on</strong>within <strong>the</strong> 8,000 ha LiDAR transect we acquired in centralBritish Columbia, resulting in a sampling design thatincluded 376 different Landsat pixels and nearly 16,000syn<strong>the</strong>tic images. Results indicated that <strong>the</strong> EnhancedVegetati<strong>on</strong> Index, and spectral brightness and greenness are145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!