11.07.2015 Views

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

2012 AGU Chapman Conference on Remote Sensing of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

terrestrial water storage are c<strong>on</strong>sistent with increased netprecipitati<strong>on</strong> over <strong>the</strong> Eurasian Pan-Arctic regi<strong>on</strong>. At finerspatial scales, in particular in <strong>the</strong> central Lena basin,terrestrial water storage change detected by GRACE showsincreases over regi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> disc<strong>on</strong>tinuous permafrost,potentially indicating changes in <strong>the</strong> active layer thickness inthose areas. We also use GRACE total water storageanomalies to evaluate biases in <strong>the</strong> net precipitati<strong>on</strong> from<strong>the</strong> re-analysis data, as well as <strong>the</strong> cold-seas<strong>on</strong> precipitati<strong>on</strong>estimates from two global, merged satellite–gaugeprecipitati<strong>on</strong> analyses—Global Precipitati<strong>on</strong> ClimatologyProject (GPCP) and Climate Predicti<strong>on</strong> Center MergedAnalysis <strong>of</strong> Precipitati<strong>on</strong> (CMAP). In general, spatial patternsand interannual variability are highly correlated between <strong>the</strong>datasets, although significant differences are also observed.Differences vary by regi<strong>on</strong> but typically increase at higherlatitudes. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, results indicate that <strong>the</strong> gaugeundercatch correcti<strong>on</strong> used by GPCP may be overestimated.These comparis<strong>on</strong>s may be useful for assessing precipitati<strong>on</strong>estimates over large regi<strong>on</strong>s, where in-situ gauge networksmay be sparse.Lars<strong>on</strong>, Kristine M.GPS Snow <strong>Sensing</strong>Lars<strong>on</strong>, Kristine M. 1 ; Nievinski, Felipe 1 ; Gutmann, Ethan 2 ;Small, Eric 11. Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Colorado,Boulder, CO, USA2. NCAR, Boulder, CO, USAThe Global Positi<strong>on</strong>ing System c<strong>on</strong>tinuously transmitsL-band signals to support real-time navigati<strong>on</strong> users. Thesesame signals are being tracked by networks <strong>of</strong> high-precisi<strong>on</strong>GPS instruments that were installed by geophysicists andgeodesists to measure plate moti<strong>on</strong>s. Many states andcounties also operate GPS networks to supporttransportati<strong>on</strong> engineers and land surveyors. Over 2500 <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>se systems have been deployed in <strong>the</strong> United States. Theyoperate c<strong>on</strong>tinuously, and data are made publicly availablewithin 24 hours. Geodesists model <strong>the</strong> direct signal betweeneach GPS satellite and <strong>the</strong> ground antenna to calculate <strong>the</strong>positi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> each GPS site.Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> signal reflects from<strong>the</strong> ground and arrives at <strong>the</strong> antenna late. The interferencebetween <strong>the</strong> direct and reflected GPS signal is what we use toinfer snow depth. For most sites <strong>the</strong> footprint <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> methodis 30 meters in radius with a snow depth precisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>approximately 3 cm. These data complement small-scale insitu snow depth sensors and satellite methods. We currentlyoperate 5 calibrati<strong>on</strong> sites in Utah, Idaho, and Colorado.Comparis<strong>on</strong>s between GPS snow depth retrievals and o<strong>the</strong>rin situ sensors will be discussed. We will also dem<strong>on</strong>strate<strong>the</strong> GPS snow sensing method at sites from <strong>the</strong> NSFEarthScope Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO). Thisnetwork c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> 1100 receivers in <strong>the</strong> western UnitedStates and Alaska.http://xen<strong>on</strong>.colorado.edu/reflecti<strong>on</strong>s/GPS_reflecti<strong>on</strong>s/Intro.htmlLebsock, Mat<strong>the</strong>w D.The Complementary Role <strong>of</strong> Observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> LightRainfall from CloudSatLebsock, Mat<strong>the</strong>w D. 1 ; Stephens, Graeme 1 ; L’Ecuyer, Tristan 21. Jet Propulsi<strong>on</strong> Lab, Pasadena, CA, USA2. University <strong>of</strong> Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin, Madis<strong>on</strong>, WI, USAThe CloudSat rainfall algorithms are presented as auseful complementary data source to <strong>the</strong> more establishedPrecipitati<strong>on</strong> Radar (PR) and passive microwaveprecipitati<strong>on</strong> sensors. The specific strengths <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CloudSatinstrument including it’s excellent sensitivity and resoluti<strong>on</strong>highlight its ability to fill in <strong>the</strong> light end <strong>of</strong> Earth’s rainfallspectrum that escapes detecti<strong>on</strong> by o<strong>the</strong>r sensors. Todem<strong>on</strong>strate <strong>the</strong> complementary nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CloudSatobservati<strong>on</strong>s, a comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> warm rainfall from CloudSatwith AMSR-E shows <strong>the</strong> dramatic improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Goddard Pr<strong>of</strong>iling algorithm (GPROF)-2010 algorithm overGPROF-2004 at quantifying warm rain. Despite <strong>the</strong>significant improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passive microwave algorithmsubstantial regi<strong>on</strong>al biases in GPROF-2010 that are relatedto variati<strong>on</strong>s in Sea Surface Temperature (SST) and ColumnWater Vapor (CWV) persist. These regi<strong>on</strong>al biases are relatedto <strong>the</strong> fundamental detecti<strong>on</strong> capabilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PR, which isused to create <strong>the</strong> rainfall database employed by <strong>the</strong> passivemicrowave algorithm. A series <strong>of</strong> sensitivity calculati<strong>on</strong>sindicate that <strong>the</strong> Dual-frequency Precipitati<strong>on</strong> Radar (DPR)that will fly as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Global Precipitati<strong>on</strong> Missi<strong>on</strong>(GPM) will significantly mitigate <strong>the</strong>se detecti<strong>on</strong> issues.Colocati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DPR with <strong>the</strong> GPM Microwave Imager(GMI) will have <strong>the</strong> added benefit <strong>of</strong> improving <strong>the</strong> GPROFrainfall database and thus <strong>the</strong> climate data record providedby passive microwave instruments.Lee, Hy<strong>on</strong>gkiCharacterizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Terrestrial Water Dynamics in<strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>go Basin Using GRACE and Satellite RadarAltimetryLee, Hy<strong>on</strong>gki 1 ; Beighley, R. Edward 2 ; Alsdorf, Douglas 3 ; Jung,Hahn Chul 4 ; Shum, C. k. 3 ; Duan, Jianbin 3 ; Guo, Junyi 3 ;Yamazaki, Dai 5 ; Andreadis, K<strong>on</strong>stantinos 61. University <strong>of</strong> Houst<strong>on</strong>, Houst<strong>on</strong>, TX, USA2. FM Global, Norwood, MA, USA3. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA4. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA5. University <strong>of</strong> Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan6. Jet Propulsi<strong>on</strong> Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USAThe C<strong>on</strong>go Basin is <strong>the</strong> world’s third largest in size (~3.7milli<strong>on</strong> km^2), and sec<strong>on</strong>d <strong>on</strong>ly to <strong>the</strong> Amaz<strong>on</strong> River indischarge (~40,200 cms annual average). However, <strong>the</strong>hydrological dynamics <strong>of</strong> seas<strong>on</strong>ally flooded wetlands andfloodplains remains poorly quantified. Here, we separate <strong>the</strong>C<strong>on</strong>go wetland into four 3° 3° regi<strong>on</strong>s, and use remotesensing measurements (i.e., GRACE, satellite radar altimeter,GPCP, JERS-1, SRTM, and MODIS) to estimate <strong>the</strong> amounts<strong>of</strong> water filling and draining from <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>go wetland, and88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!