Gebregiorgis, Abebe S.Characterizing Satellite Rainfall Errors based <strong>on</strong>Land Use and Land Cover and Tracing Error Sourcein Hydrologic Model Simulati<strong>on</strong>Gebregiorgis, Abebe S. 1 ; Peters-Lidard, Christa D. 2 ; Tian,Yud<strong>on</strong>g 2, 3 ; Hossain, Faisal 11. Civil and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Eng’g, Tennessee TechnologicalUniversity, Cookeville, TN, USA2. Hydrological Science Branch, NASA Goddard SpaceFlight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA3. Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center,University <strong>of</strong> Maryland Baltimore County, Greenbelt,MD, USAHydrologic modeling has benefited from operati<strong>on</strong>alproducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> high resoluti<strong>on</strong> satellite rainfall products. Theglobal coverage, near-real time availability, spatial andtemporal sampling resoluti<strong>on</strong>s have advanced <strong>the</strong>applicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> physically based semi-distributed anddistributed hydrologic models for wide range <strong>of</strong>envir<strong>on</strong>mental decisi<strong>on</strong> making processes. Despite thissuccess, <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> uncertainties inherent in <strong>the</strong>indirect way <strong>of</strong> satellite rainfall estimati<strong>on</strong> and hydrologicmodels pose a challenge in making meaningful and practicalpredicti<strong>on</strong>s. This study comprises breaking down <strong>of</strong> totalsatellite rainfall error into three independent comp<strong>on</strong>ents(hit bias, missed precipitati<strong>on</strong> and false alarm),characterizing <strong>the</strong>m as functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> land use and land cover(LULC), and tracing back <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> simulated soilmoisture and run<strong>of</strong>f error in physically based distributedhydrologic model. Here, we asked “<strong>on</strong> what way <strong>the</strong> threeindependent total bias comp<strong>on</strong>ents, hit bias, missed, andfalse precipitati<strong>on</strong>, affect <strong>the</strong> estimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> soil moisture andrun<strong>of</strong>f in a physically based hydrologic model?” Weimplemented a systematic approach by characterizing anddecomposing <strong>the</strong> total satellite rainfall error as a functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>land use and land cover <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mississippi basin. Thisfacilitated <strong>the</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major source <strong>of</strong> soilmoisture and run<strong>of</strong>f errors in hydrologic model simulati<strong>on</strong>and tracing back <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> to algorithmdevelopment and sensor type. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, we believe sucha forensic approach stands to improve algorithmdevelopment, applicati<strong>on</strong> and data assimilati<strong>on</strong> scheme forGlobal Precipitati<strong>on</strong> Measurement (GPM) missi<strong>on</strong>. Keywords: total bias, hit bias, missed precipitati<strong>on</strong>, false alarm,soil moisture error, and run<strong>of</strong>f error, land use and land cover66Gebremichael, Mek<strong>on</strong>nenEstimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Daily Evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> over Africausing MODIS/Terra and SEVIRI/MSG dataGebremichael, Mek<strong>on</strong>nen 1 ; Sun, Zhigang 21. Civil and Env. Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> C<strong>on</strong>necticut,Storrs, CT, USA2. Nati<strong>on</strong>al Institute <strong>of</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Studies, Tsukuba,JapanMost existing remote sensing-based evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong>(ET) algorithms rely exclusively <strong>on</strong> polar-orbiting satelliteswith <strong>the</strong>rmal infrared sensors, and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> resulting ETvalues represent <strong>on</strong>ly “instantaneous or snapshot” values.However, daily ET is more meaningful and useful inapplicati<strong>on</strong>s. In this study, daily ET estimates are obtainedby combining data from <strong>the</strong> MODIS sensor aboard <strong>the</strong>polar-orbiting Terra satellite and <strong>the</strong> SEVIRI sensor aboard<strong>the</strong> geostati<strong>on</strong>ary-orbiting MSG satellite. The procedurec<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> estimating <strong>the</strong> instantaneous evaporative fracti<strong>on</strong>(EF) based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> MODIS/Terra land data products, andestimating <strong>the</strong> daily net radiati<strong>on</strong> and daily available energybased <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 30-min SEVIRI/MSG data products. Assumingc<strong>on</strong>stant EF during <strong>the</strong> daytime, daily ET is estimated as <strong>the</strong>product <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SEVIRI/MSG-based daily available energy andMODIS/Terra-based instantaneous EF. The daily ETestimates are evaluated against flux tower measurements atfour validati<strong>on</strong> sites in Africa. Results indicate that <strong>the</strong>synergistic use <strong>of</strong> SEVIRI/MSG and MODIS/Terra has <strong>the</strong>potential to provide reliable estimates <strong>of</strong> daily ET during wetperiods when daily ET exceeds 1 mm/day. The satellite-baseddaily ET estimates however tend to underestimate ET by 13%to 35%. The daily ET estimati<strong>on</strong> algorithm can fur<strong>the</strong>r beimproved by incorporating a temporal data-fillinginterpolati<strong>on</strong> technique to estimate <strong>the</strong> unavailable netradiati<strong>on</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> during cloudy sky c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, and byimproving <strong>the</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> instantaneous EF. Theassumpti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stant evaporative fracti<strong>on</strong> during <strong>the</strong> dayis reas<strong>on</strong>able, and does not result in substantial errors in <strong>the</strong>daily ET estimates.Gebremichael, Mek<strong>on</strong>nenError Model and Tuning Extremes for SatelliteRainfall EstimatesGebremichael, Mek<strong>on</strong>nen 11. Civil and Env. Engineering, University <strong>of</strong> C<strong>on</strong>necticut,Storrs, CT, USAA new model is developed that generates <strong>the</strong>distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> actual rainfall values for any given satelliterainfall estimate. The model handles <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>aldistributi<strong>on</strong> as <strong>the</strong> mixture <strong>of</strong> a positive c<strong>on</strong>tinuousdistributi<strong>on</strong> and a point mass at zero. A method is alsopresented to probabilistically transform a set <strong>of</strong> satelliterainfall estimates into <strong>the</strong> more accurate rainfall estimates.As our c<strong>on</strong>cern lies with extreme precipitati<strong>on</strong>, a peaks overthreshold extreme value approach is adopted that fits aPareto distributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> large precipitati<strong>on</strong> estimates. Asimple distributi<strong>on</strong>al transformati<strong>on</strong> result is <strong>the</strong>n used to
match <strong>the</strong> two sets <strong>of</strong> estimates. The method can generallybe used to transform <strong>on</strong>e set <strong>of</strong> rainfall values to ano<strong>the</strong>r.The model development and transformati<strong>on</strong> techniqueshave been performed using rain gauge-adjusted groundbasedradar rainfall representing actual rainfall andCMORPH satellite rainfall estimates, available at aresoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 0.25 degrees x 0.25 degrees and 3-hourly, over adomain <strong>of</strong> 6.25 degrees x 6.25 degrees in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rnUnited States. The approaches can be replicated in o<strong>the</strong>rregi<strong>on</strong>s.Geli, Hatim M.Evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Natural Vegetati<strong>on</strong> usingLandsat and Airborne <strong>Remote</strong> <strong>Sensing</strong>Geli, Hatim M. 1 ; Neale, Christopher M. 11. Civil and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Engineering, Utah StateUniversity, Logan, UT, USAAreas with natural vegetati<strong>on</strong> are an importantcomp<strong>on</strong>ent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Earth’s ecosystem. Estimates <strong>of</strong>evapotranspirati<strong>on</strong> (ET) over such areas are vital forunderstading <strong>the</strong>se systems behavior and water balance.However, <strong>the</strong> inherent heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> such land cover inarid and semi-arid areas imposes some modeling challengeswith respect to estimating ET. This analysis is an effort toimprove accuracy <strong>of</strong> ET estimates over naturally vegetatedsurfaces. We applied <strong>the</strong> two source energy balance (TSEB)approach <strong>of</strong> Norman et al. (1995). The two types <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>TSEB model formulati<strong>on</strong>s i.e. series and parallel resistanceswere examined. <strong>Remote</strong> sensing datasets from Landsat 5Thematic Mapper and <strong>the</strong> USU airborne multispectraldigital system were used. These data provide us with abilityto also examine <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> models with respectto pixel resoluti<strong>on</strong>s ranging from 1 to 30 m in <strong>the</strong> shortwavebands and 4 to 120 m in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal infrared. These areissues that need to be highlighted for future satellite sensorc<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong>s. Surface energy fluxes (i.e. Rn, G, H, E) andET were estimated and compared with Bowen ratiomeasurements using 3D footprints analysis. The modelperformance were associated with surface featurescharacteristics including leaf area index (LAI), fracti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>cover (f c), canopy height (h c), radiometric temperature, soilmoisture c<strong>on</strong>tent, and groundwater table. Such associati<strong>on</strong>will help in defining/ highlighting strengths and weaknesses<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model c<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong>s. We also investigated <strong>the</strong>appropriateness and representativeness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quasi-point BRmeasurements <strong>of</strong> H compared to those obtained using largeaperture scintillometer (LAS) at <strong>the</strong> kilometer scale. TheseLAS measurements <strong>of</strong> H were improved by incorporatingdetailed 1-m scale hc maps from LiDAR (Light Detecti<strong>on</strong>and Ranging) following Geli et al. (2011). Issues regardingerrors when extrapolating instantaneous remote sensingbased estimates <strong>of</strong> E to daily values <strong>of</strong> ET were alsodiscussed. The analysis was carried over a riparian z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Lower Colorado River at <strong>the</strong> Cibola Nati<strong>on</strong>al WildlifeRefuge, California. The ecosystem comprises a saltcedar(Tamarix ramosissima) forest covers with varying density,arrowweed (Pulchea sericea) and Mesquite (Prosopis glandolusa)interspersed with bare soil over an area <strong>of</strong> about 4 km by 5km. References Geli, H. M. E., C. M. U. Neale, D. Watts, J.Osterberg, H. A. R. De Bruin, W. Kohsiek, R. T. Pack & L. E.Hipps, (2011). Scintillometer-Based Estimates <strong>of</strong> SensibleHeat Flux using LiDAR-Derived Surface Roughness, J.Hydromet., (accepted). Norman, J. M., W. P. Kustas, & K. S.Humes, (1995). A two-source approach for estimating soiland vegetati<strong>on</strong> energy fluxes in observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> directi<strong>on</strong>alradiometric surface temperature. Agric. Forest Mete., 77,263–293.Getirana, AugustoThe hydrological modeling and analysis platform(HyMAP): model results and automatic calibrati<strong>on</strong>with ENVISAT altimetric dataGetirana, Augusto 1, 2 ; Yamazaki, Dai 3 ; Bo<strong>on</strong>e, Aar<strong>on</strong> 4 ;Decharme, Bertrand 4 ; Mognard, Nelly 21. Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA/GSFC,Greenbelt, MD, USA2. LEGOS/CNES, Toulouse, France3. University <strong>of</strong> Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan4. CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse, FranceRecent advances in radar altimetry in <strong>the</strong> last twentyyears have improved precisi<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> m<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>of</strong> waterheight variability <strong>of</strong> rivers and lakes located in ungauged orpoorly gauged regi<strong>on</strong>s. These advances have motivatedseveral applicati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se data in hydrological studies.The next and most promising step for <strong>the</strong> spatial altimetrytechnology is <strong>the</strong> Surface Water and Ocean Topography(SWOT) missi<strong>on</strong>, planned to be launched within <strong>the</strong> decade.In this sense, efforts have been made towards <strong>the</strong>improvement <strong>of</strong> model parameter estimati<strong>on</strong> techniquesbased <strong>on</strong> assimilati<strong>on</strong> and optimizati<strong>on</strong> techniques. Theseefforts have mainly focused <strong>on</strong> meso and regi<strong>on</strong>al scalemodels. In additi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> combinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> optimizati<strong>on</strong>techniques and radar altimetry has been very few exploredup to date, specially with global flow routing (GFR) schemes.As a general rule, GFR schemes are calibrated manuallybased <strong>on</strong> few available river geometry informati<strong>on</strong> and byevaluating maximum likelihood functi<strong>on</strong>s for measuring <strong>the</strong>“closeness” <strong>of</strong> model outputs and situ or satellite-basedobservati<strong>on</strong>s. This process guarantees, in most <strong>of</strong> cases, acompromise between model efficiency and realistic(physically-based) estimati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> model parameters. However,<strong>the</strong> readily and massive availability <strong>of</strong> altimetric data and <strong>the</strong>successful results obtained by previous studies using <strong>the</strong>sedata makes <strong>on</strong>e ask if similar methodologies could be usedto drive GFR schemes and represent spatiotemporal surfacewater fluxes. This study presents <strong>the</strong> calibrati<strong>on</strong> andevaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a new GFR scheme (<strong>the</strong> Hydrological Modelingand Analysis Platform - HyMAP). HyMAP is a global flowrouting scheme composed <strong>of</strong> 0.25-degree grid cells over <strong>the</strong>c<strong>on</strong>tinents and <strong>the</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f and baseflow generated by a landsurface model are routed using a kinematic waveformulati<strong>on</strong> through a prescribed river network to oceans orinland seas. The model is composed <strong>of</strong> four modules: (1)surface run<strong>of</strong>f and groundwater drainage time delays; (2)67
- Page 5 and 6:
SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMSUNDAY, 19 FEBRUA
- Page 7 and 8:
1600h - 1900hMM-1MM-2MM-3MM-4MM-5MM
- Page 9 and 10:
GM-7GM-8GM-9GM-10GM-11GM-12GM-13160
- Page 11 and 12:
EM-25EM-26EM-27EM-28EM-29EM-301600h
- Page 13 and 14:
SMM-8SMM-9SMM-10SMM-11SMM-12SMM-13S
- Page 15 and 16: SCM-24SCM-251600h - 1900hPM-1PM-2PM
- Page 17 and 18: 1030h - 1200h1030h - 1200h1030h - 1
- Page 19 and 20: ET-13ET-14ET-15ET-16ET-17ET-18ET-19
- Page 21 and 22: SWT-19SWT-201600h - 1900hSMT-1SMT-2
- Page 23 and 24: SCT-14SCT-15SCT-16SCT-17SCT-18SCT-1
- Page 25 and 26: MT-2MT-3MT-4MT-5MT-6MT-7MT-8MT-9MT-
- Page 27 and 28: 1330h - 1530h1530h - 1600h1600h - 1
- Page 29 and 30: esilience to hydrological hazards a
- Page 31 and 32: Alfieri, Joseph G.The Factors Influ
- Page 33 and 34: Montana and Oregon. Other applicati
- Page 35 and 36: accuracy of snow derivation from si
- Page 37 and 38: seasonal trends, and integrate clou
- Page 40 and 41: a single mission, the phrase “nea
- Page 42 and 43: climate and land surface unaccounte
- Page 44 and 45: esolution lidar-derived DEM was com
- Page 46 and 47: further verified that even for conv
- Page 48 and 49: underway and its utility can be ass
- Page 50 and 51: Courault, DominiqueAssessment of mo
- Page 52 and 53: used three Landsat-5 TM images (05/
- Page 55: storage change solutions in the for
- Page 59 and 60: Famiglietti, James S.Getting Real A
- Page 61 and 62: can be thought of as operating in t
- Page 63 and 64: mission and will address the follow
- Page 65: Gan, Thian Y.Soil Moisture Retrieva
- Page 69 and 70: producing CGF snow cover products.
- Page 71 and 72: performance of the AWRA-L model for
- Page 73 and 74: oth local and regional hydrology. T
- Page 75 and 76: Euphorbia heterandena, and Echinops
- Page 77 and 78: the effectiveness of this calibrati
- Page 79 and 80: presents challenges to the validati
- Page 81 and 82: long period time (1976-2010) was co
- Page 83 and 84: has more improved resolution ( ) to
- Page 85 and 86: in the flow over the floodplain ari
- Page 87 and 88: fraction of the fresh water resourc
- Page 89 and 90: to determine the source of the wate
- Page 91 and 92: hydrologists, was initially assigne
- Page 93 and 94: Sturm et al. (1995) introduced a se
- Page 95 and 96: calendar day are then truncated and
- Page 97 and 98: climate associated with hydrologica
- Page 99 and 100: California Institute of Technology
- Page 101 and 102: egion in Northern California that i
- Page 103 and 104: Moller, DelwynTopographic Mapping o
- Page 105 and 106: obtained from the Fifth Microwave W
- Page 107 and 108: a constraint that is observed spati
- Page 109 and 110: groundwater degradation, seawater i
- Page 111 and 112: approach to estimate soil water con
- Page 113 and 114: Norouzi, HamidrezaLand Surface Char
- Page 115 and 116: Painter, Thomas H.The JPL Airborne
- Page 117 and 118:
Pavelsky, Tamlin M.Continuous River
- Page 119 and 120:
interferometric synthetic aperture
- Page 121 and 122:
elevant satellite missions, such as
- Page 123 and 124:
support decision-making related to
- Page 125 and 126:
oth the quantification of human wat
- Page 127 and 128:
parameter inversion of the time inv
- Page 129 and 130:
ground-based observational forcing
- Page 131 and 132:
Selkowitz, DavidExploring Landsat-d
- Page 133 and 134:
Shahroudi, NargesMicrowave Emissivi
- Page 135 and 136:
well as subsurface hydrological con
- Page 137 and 138:
Sturm, MatthewRemote Sensing and Gr
- Page 139 and 140:
Sutanudjaja, Edwin H.Using space-bo
- Page 141 and 142:
which can be monitored as an indica
- Page 143 and 144:
tools and methods to address one of
- Page 145 and 146:
Vanderjagt, Benjamin J.How sub-pixe
- Page 147 and 148:
Vila, Daniel A.Satellite Rainfall R
- Page 149 and 150:
and landuse sustainability. In this
- Page 151 and 152:
e very significant as seepage occur
- Page 153 and 154:
Wood, Eric F.Challenges in Developi
- Page 155 and 156:
Xie, PingpingGauge - Satellite Merg
- Page 157 and 158:
Yebra, MartaRemote sensing canopy c
- Page 159 and 160:
used. PIHM has ability to simulate