179Ibid., Annex, III: Global Report.180Ibid., Annex, III: Global Report: A Purpose and Scope. Para. 2.181Ibid., Annex, III: Global Report: A Purpose and Scope. Para. 1.182Ibid., Annex, III: Global Report, B: Modalities. Para. 1: us<strong>in</strong>g official <strong>in</strong><strong>format</strong>ion, <strong>in</strong><strong>format</strong>ion ga<strong>the</strong>red <strong>in</strong>accordance with established procedures, or on f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> annual follow-up), para. 2.183Ibid., Annex, III: Global Report, B: Modalities. Para. 2.184Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Mult<strong>in</strong>ationalEnterprises.” Declaration and Decisions on International Investment and Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises (DAFFE/IME(2000)20). 8 Nov. 2000. [Here<strong>in</strong>after referred <strong>to</strong> as OECD. “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.”]185Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Declaration and Decisions on InternationalInvestment and Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises (DAFFE/IME (2000)20). 8 Nov. 2000. The Declaration is composedof <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>the</strong> National Treatment Instrument, an <strong>in</strong>strument on International Investment Incentivesand Dis<strong>in</strong>centives and an <strong>in</strong>strument on Conflict<strong>in</strong>g Requirements. For <strong>the</strong> purpose of this discussion, only<strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es will be explored. The Guidel<strong>in</strong>es were subject <strong>to</strong> amendments <strong>in</strong> 1979, 1984 and 1991; majorrevision began <strong>in</strong> 1998 with consultations with bus<strong>in</strong>ess, labour and non-governmental organisations. Theofficial revision, completed <strong>in</strong> 2000, widened <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es, improved <strong>the</strong> implementation processand added provisions address<strong>in</strong>g human rights.186OECD “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.” Paras. 1, 7.187Ibid., para 10 (“[t]he common aim of <strong>the</strong> governments adher<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es is <strong>to</strong> encourage <strong>the</strong> positivecontributions that [MNEs] can make <strong>to</strong> economic, environmental and social progress and <strong>to</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imize <strong>the</strong>difficulties <strong>to</strong> which <strong>the</strong>ir various operations may give rise. […]. Governments adher<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es arecommitted <strong>to</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ual improvement of both domestic and <strong>in</strong>ternational policies with a view <strong>to</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>welfare and liv<strong>in</strong>g standards of all people”).188Ibid. As <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es will only be explored <strong>in</strong> so far as it relates <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> CSEC, not all head<strong>in</strong>gs are relevant <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> discussion. Obligations related <strong>to</strong> Environment, Combat<strong>in</strong>g Bribery, Consumer Interests, Competition andTaxation will not be explored.189Ibid., 2.190OECD. “Commentary.” The OECD Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises: Revision 2000. Paris: OECDPublications, 2000. [Here<strong>in</strong>after referred <strong>to</strong> as OECD. “Commentary.” Revision 2000.]191OECD. “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.” Part I.192Ibid., Part II. See also OECD. “Commentary.” Revision 2000. Para. 1 (“[t]he General Policies chapter […] isimportant for sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>ne and establish<strong>in</strong>g common fundamental pr<strong>in</strong>ciples for specific recommendations<strong>in</strong> subsequent chapters”).193OECD. “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.” Part I, para. 3 (“[t]hese usually comprise companies or o<strong>the</strong>r enterprises established<strong>in</strong> more than one country and so l<strong>in</strong>ked that <strong>the</strong>y may co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong>ir operations <strong>in</strong> various ways. […].Ownership may be private, state or mixed. The Guidel<strong>in</strong>es are address <strong>to</strong> all <strong>the</strong> entities with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> [MNE](parent companies and/or local entities)”).194Ibid., Part I, para. 7 (Governments have <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> “… prescribe <strong>the</strong> conditions under which [MNEs] operatewith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir jurisdictions, subject <strong>to</strong> International Law…”). See also OECD “Commentary.” Revision 2000. Para.2 (“[o]bey<strong>in</strong>g domestic law is <strong>the</strong> first obligation of bus<strong>in</strong>ess. […]. [The Guidel<strong>in</strong>es] represent supplementarypr<strong>in</strong>ciples and standards of behaviour of a non-legal character”).195OECD. “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.” Part II, paras 1-11.196Ibid., Part II, para. 1.197Ibid., Part II, para. 2. See also “General Policies.” Para. 4 (“… [MNEs] are encouraged <strong>to</strong> respect human rights,not only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir deal<strong>in</strong>gs with employees, but also with respect <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs affected by <strong>the</strong>ir activities […]”).198Ibid., Part II, para. 3. See also “General Policies.” Para. 5 (refers <strong>to</strong> human capital <strong>format</strong>ion and employeedevelopment through hir<strong>in</strong>g practices, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and o<strong>the</strong>r employee developments).199Ibid., Part I, para. 7.200Ibid., “General Policies.” Para. 3 (“[e]nterprises should be viewed as partners with government <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> developmentand use of both voluntary and regula<strong>to</strong>ry approaches […] <strong>to</strong> policies affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m”).201Ibid., Part IV, para. 1.202OECD. “Commentary.” Revision 2000. Para. 19 (“[t]his chapter opens with a chapeau that <strong>in</strong>cludes a reference118|Private Sec<strong>to</strong>r Accountability <strong>in</strong> Combat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Commercial Sexual Exploitation of <strong>Child</strong>ren
<strong>to</strong> “applicable” law and regulations, [acknowledg<strong>in</strong>g] <strong>the</strong> fact that [MNEs], […], may be subject <strong>to</strong> national,sub-national, as well as supra-national levels of regulation […]. The terms “prevail<strong>in</strong>g labour relations” and“employment practices” are sufficiently broad <strong>to</strong> permit a variety of <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>in</strong> light of different nationalcircumstances […]”).203OECD. “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.” Part IV, para. 1 (a-d)).204OECD. “Commentary.” Revision 2000. Para. 20 (<strong>the</strong> human rights provisions echo rights found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ILOsFundamental Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and that <strong>the</strong> ILOs Tripartite Declaration can assist <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es).205See also ibid. Para. 20-22 (The four human rights pr<strong>in</strong>ciples echo <strong>the</strong> rights <strong>in</strong> ILO. Declaration on FundamentalPr<strong>in</strong>ciples and Rights at Work. Geneva: ILO, 1977. Specifically, <strong>the</strong> ‘effective abolition of child labour’refers <strong>to</strong> ILO Convention 182 concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> worst forms of child labour and ILO Convention 138 andRecommendation 146, regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum age of employment (ILO Convention 182: Worst Forms of <strong>Child</strong>Labour Convention, 1999; ILO Convention 138: M<strong>in</strong>imum Age Convention, 1973; and ILO Recommendation146: M<strong>in</strong>imum Age Recommendation, 1973. Accessed on 14 Oct. 2008 from: www.ilo.org). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, MNEsmay contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> effective abolition of child labour through labour management practices, creation of highquality and well paid jobs and contribut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> economic growth, which all address ‘<strong>the</strong> root causes of poverty<strong>in</strong> general and of child labour <strong>in</strong> practice.’ MNEs may also contribute <strong>to</strong> a ‘last<strong>in</strong>g solution’ by, for example,rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> standards of education <strong>in</strong> host countries). Para. 23 (regard<strong>in</strong>g compulsory labour, MNEs are directed<strong>to</strong> Conventions 29 and 105 (ILO Convention 29: Forced Labour Convention, 1930 and ILO Convention 105:Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957. Accessed on 14 Oct. 2008 from: www.ilo.org). Para. 24 (regard<strong>in</strong>gnon-discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, MNEs are directed <strong>to</strong> ILO Convention 111 which enumerates an unexhausted list ofimpermissible grounds for discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> hir<strong>in</strong>g, discharge, pay, promotion, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and retirement (ILOConvention 111: Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958. Accessed on 14 Oct. 2008from: www.ilo.org).206See OECD “Commentary.” Revision 2000. Para. 53 (“[MNEs] are <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> conduit of technology transferacross borders. They contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> national <strong>in</strong>novative capacity of <strong>the</strong>ir host countries by generat<strong>in</strong>g, diffus<strong>in</strong>g,and even enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> use of new technologies by domestic enterprises and <strong>in</strong>stitutions. The [research anddevelopment] activities of MNEs, when well connected <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> national <strong>in</strong>novation system, can help enhance<strong>the</strong> economic and social progress <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir host countries”).207See OECD “Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.” Part VIII, paras. 1-5 (MNEs are asked, where applicable, relevant or practical,<strong>to</strong> contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>in</strong>novative capacity; adopt policies allow<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> ‘rapid diffusion oftechnology and know-how’; develop science and technology <strong>to</strong> address <strong>the</strong> needs of local markets; employlocals <strong>in</strong> science and technology and encourage <strong>the</strong>ir tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g; grant Intellectual Property licenses or technologytransfer, so as <strong>to</strong> contribute <strong>to</strong> long-term development prospects of host countries; and participate <strong>in</strong> researchprojects with local universities, public research <strong>in</strong>stitutions and local <strong>in</strong>dividuals).208Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Declaration and Decisions on InternationalInvestment and Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises (DAFFE/IME (2000)20). 8 Nov. 2000. Part II: 1. Para 1.209Ibid., Part II: 1. Decision of <strong>the</strong> Council: 1. Para. 1. NCPs. See also Part II: 1. Decision of <strong>the</strong> Council:Procedural Guidance: I. NCPs, B. In<strong>format</strong>ion and Promotion (outl<strong>in</strong>es means by which NCPs will accomplishGuidel<strong>in</strong>e promotion).210Ibid., Part II: 1. Decision of <strong>the</strong> Council: Procedural Guidance: I. NCPs, C. Implementation <strong>in</strong> SpecificInstances (NCPs will “[m]ake an <strong>in</strong>itial assessment of whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> issues raised merit fur<strong>the</strong>r exam<strong>in</strong>ation andrespond <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> party or parties rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m”). See also Part II: 1. Decision of <strong>the</strong> Council: Commentary on <strong>the</strong>Implementation Procedures: I. Procedural Guidance for NCPs, Implementation <strong>in</strong> Specific Instances, Para. 14(<strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>itial assessment, NCPs will “… determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> issue is bona fide and relevant […].”In mak<strong>in</strong>g this decision, NCPs will take several fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: a party’s <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> matter;whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> issue is material and substantiated; <strong>the</strong> relevance of applicable law and procedures; how similarissues have been treated; and whe<strong>the</strong>r consideration of <strong>the</strong> specific issue would contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> purposes andeffectiveness of <strong>the</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es).211Ibid., Part II: 1. Decision of <strong>the</strong> Council: Procedural Guidance: I. NCPs, C. Implementation <strong>in</strong> SpecificInstances (NCPs will consult parties <strong>in</strong>volved and, ‘where relevant,’ seek advice from relevant authorities andparties, consult foreign NCPs, seek guidance from CIIME, and offer or facilitate non-adversarial means ofresolution. If parties do not come <strong>to</strong> a resolution, NCPs may make “recommendations” on <strong>the</strong> implementationPrivate Sec<strong>to</strong>r Accountability <strong>in</strong> Combat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Commercial Sexual Exploitation of <strong>Child</strong>ren|119
- Page 5 and 6:
PRIVATE SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITYIN COM
- Page 7 and 8:
3. Travel and Tourism Sub-Sector 63
- Page 9 and 10:
Executive SummarySince the First an
- Page 11 and 12:
from the sale of child pornography
- Page 13 and 14:
1.1 Defining Commercial Sexual Expl
- Page 15 and 16:
The issue of commercial sexual expl
- Page 17 and 18:
1.2.1 Transnational and multination
- Page 19 and 20:
offer stronger protections against,
- Page 21 and 22:
1.3 Defining Corporate Social Respo
- Page 23 and 24:
Parliament passed a law requiring a
- Page 25 and 26:
2. International Standards and the
- Page 27 and 28:
In terms of international law, the
- Page 29 and 30:
alia: establish the grounds for cri
- Page 31 and 32:
The ILO Convention No. 138, Concern
- Page 33 and 34:
2.4 Existing Legal Mechanisms to En
- Page 35 and 36:
2.4.2 Existing mechanisms for regul
- Page 37 and 38:
Governments play an auxiliary role
- Page 39:
lack of ) monitoring and enforcemen
- Page 42 and 43:
who follow relevant international l
- Page 44 and 45:
the Commentary references the rule
- Page 46 and 47:
2.4.2.1.2.1 Tripartite DeclarationT
- Page 48 and 49:
Unlike the preceding sections, whic
- Page 50 and 51:
A major criticism of the Tripartite
- Page 52 and 53:
MNEs are asked to respect worker’
- Page 54 and 55:
Guidelines voluntary, but non-OECD
- Page 56 and 57:
An alternative to the above is to r
- Page 58 and 59:
freedom from state interference in
- Page 60 and 61:
During the Nuremburg Tribunals, Ger
- Page 62 and 63:
ATCA expanded liability for interna
- Page 64 and 65:
Pursuant to the holding in Kadic re
- Page 66 and 67:
The Court could establish jurisdict
- Page 68 and 69:
likely come across similar obstacle
- Page 70 and 71:
ecognised by customary internationa
- Page 72 and 73:
The report draws together a number
- Page 74 and 75:
means of fostering international pe
- Page 76 and 77: a resolution, as well, in which it
- Page 78 and 79: The Swedish document was originally
- Page 80 and 81: services are designed to combat chi
- Page 82 and 83: into contact with individuals who c
- Page 84 and 85: children’s perception of the worl
- Page 86 and 87: advertisement. The European adverti
- Page 88 and 89: high-profile case in the US where a
- Page 90 and 91: child actors have gone on in adulth
- Page 92 and 93: 5. New Technologies Sub-Sector5.1 C
- Page 94 and 95: North American cases illustrate how
- Page 96 and 97: With the advent of the social netwo
- Page 98 and 99: up to $US 500 if they violate the c
- Page 100 and 101: As the genre is so new, there have
- Page 102 and 103: - children’s rights advocates, go
- Page 104 and 105: law enforcement agencies, but equal
- Page 106 and 107: 6. Financial Sub-SectorIt has been
- Page 108 and 109: law enforcement is having trouble u
- Page 110 and 111: encourage cooperation and follow-up
- Page 112 and 113: emedies against all corporations op
- Page 114 and 115: Another important objective of the
- Page 116 and 117: Endnotes1 Mark Erik Hecht is an aca
- Page 118 and 119: 35Canada. Industry Canada. Corporat
- Page 120 and 121: 84On 31 Jan. 1999, UN Secretary-Gen
- Page 122 and 123: 110Norms, D.111Norms, point 5. (Rea
- Page 124 and 125: 143Ibid., “General Policies.” P
- Page 128 and 129: of the Guidelines).212Ibid., Part I
- Page 130 and 131: 258Ibid.259UNWTO Report to the UN G
- Page 132 and 133: 310Ibid., 12.311Council of Europe,
- Page 134 and 135: Germany and South Africa, ISPs are
- Page 137: The World Congress III against Sexu