2.4.2.1.1 United Nations <strong>in</strong>itiativesThere are currently two major UN <strong>in</strong>itiatives relevant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> discourse on bus<strong>in</strong>ess andhuman rights: Global Compact (Compact) and <strong>the</strong> Norms on <strong>the</strong> Responsibilities ofTransnational Corporations and O<strong>the</strong>r Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Enterprises 81 (Norms). While <strong>the</strong> Compactand <strong>the</strong> Norms articulate some similar human rights obligations, <strong>the</strong> two <strong>in</strong>struments aresignificantly different. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong>se are not <strong>the</strong> UN’s first attempt <strong>to</strong> address <strong>the</strong>human rights responsibilities of corporations. The United Nations <strong>Centre</strong> on TransnationalCorporations (UNCTC), established <strong>in</strong> 1975, began negotiat<strong>in</strong>g a Draft Code of Conduc<strong>to</strong>n Transnational Corporations <strong>in</strong> 1977. The Code set out general, economic, f<strong>in</strong>ancial andsocial rules regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> activities of MNCs and rules on disclosure of <strong>in</strong><strong>format</strong>ion. TheCode also described rights of MNCs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> host state, urged <strong>in</strong>tergovernmental cooperationand asked states <strong>to</strong> dissem<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> code and report on implementation. The Code wasnei<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>alised nor adopted by <strong>the</strong> UN General Assembly. The commission and centrewere both term<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> 1994.Over <strong>the</strong> past decade <strong>the</strong>re has been a renewed <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> regulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> activities of privatecorporations through <strong>in</strong>ternational law. In 2004, <strong>the</strong> Commission on Human Rightseffectively stalled fur<strong>the</strong>r development of <strong>the</strong> Norms; however, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same <strong>document</strong>,<strong>the</strong> Commission recognised <strong>the</strong> importance of study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> impact of transnationalcorporations on human rights. In 2005, <strong>the</strong> Office of <strong>the</strong> High Commissioner for HumanRights requested that <strong>the</strong> Secretary-General appo<strong>in</strong>t a special representative <strong>to</strong> study <strong>the</strong>issue of human rights and transnational corporations and o<strong>the</strong>r bus<strong>in</strong>ess enterprises. 82 TheSpecial Representative’s mandate is extensive and spans two years. 832.4.2.1.1.1 Global CompactThe Global Compact is not born out of a UN resolution, nor is it a formal declaration;ra<strong>the</strong>r, it is a voluntary <strong>in</strong>itiative launched by <strong>the</strong> former Secretary-General. 84 The Compactis designed <strong>to</strong> promote “responsible corporate citizenship.” Several commenta<strong>to</strong>rs discuss<strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g of this term, but essentially, it signals corporations are subject <strong>to</strong> obligations,born out of <strong>the</strong>ir desire <strong>to</strong> reduce <strong>the</strong> negative impact of <strong>the</strong>ir operations. Once acompany signs on<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Compact, it is expected <strong>to</strong> change its bus<strong>in</strong>ess operations andpublic communications. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, companies are encouraged <strong>to</strong> enter <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> partnershipprojects with <strong>the</strong> UN and o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders <strong>to</strong> support <strong>the</strong> Compact’s pr<strong>in</strong>ciples.The Compact is pr<strong>in</strong>cipally characterised as a network. It is a network among differentstakeholders and UN agencies. 85 Additionally, as participation <strong>in</strong>creased, country networkshave developed. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> Compact operates as a ‘learn<strong>in</strong>g network’ for bus<strong>in</strong>ess. TheGlobal Compact Office and UN agencies form <strong>the</strong> nucleus of <strong>the</strong> network, with academia,bus<strong>in</strong>ess, labour and civil society organisations surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m on <strong>the</strong> periphery.28|Private Sec<strong>to</strong>r Accountability <strong>in</strong> Combat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Commercial Sexual Exploitation of <strong>Child</strong>ren
Governments play an auxiliary role through outreach support, advocacy and fund<strong>in</strong>g, butdo not participate directly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> network. The Global Compact Office ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s primaryresponsibility for <strong>the</strong> facilitation of <strong>the</strong> network, but depends heavily on <strong>the</strong> collaborationof <strong>the</strong> six UN agencies and defers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> authoritative guidance of <strong>the</strong> UN Secretary-General and his Global Compact Advisory Council.The Compact asks companies <strong>to</strong> “… embrace, support and enact, with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sphere of<strong>in</strong>fluence…” ten pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> 4 categories (human rights, labour, environmentand anti-corruption). 86 As <strong>the</strong> present discussion explores <strong>in</strong>ternational human rightsobligations as <strong>the</strong>y relate <strong>to</strong> CSEC, <strong>the</strong> analysis will focus only on <strong>the</strong> first two categories.The human rights provisions state bus<strong>in</strong>esses should: Support and respect <strong>the</strong> protection of<strong>in</strong>ternationally proclaimed human rights; and, make sure <strong>the</strong>y are not complicit <strong>in</strong> humanrights abuses. The language, “support” and “respect”, means that corporations must refra<strong>in</strong>from any action or omission that violates human rights or encourages or assists <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>commission of such violations. “Internationally proclaimed human rights” refer <strong>to</strong> rightsconta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UDHR. To support and respect <strong>the</strong>se rights, several general avenuesare suggested, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: Develop<strong>in</strong>g company policies; perform<strong>in</strong>g human rights impactassessments; and consult<strong>in</strong>g with workers and <strong>the</strong>ir representatives. More specifically,bus<strong>in</strong>esses are encouraged <strong>to</strong> provide safe and healthy work<strong>in</strong>g conditions, ensure <strong>the</strong>y donot use forced or child labour, or provide access <strong>to</strong> basic health care, education and hous<strong>in</strong>gfor workers and <strong>the</strong>ir families.The complicity pr<strong>in</strong>ciple compliments <strong>the</strong> support and respect pr<strong>in</strong>ciple. Complicitysuggests facilitat<strong>in</strong>g someone else’s violations of human rights. Complicity occurs <strong>in</strong> severalforms: direct, beneficial and silent. Commenta<strong>to</strong>rs note that what constitutes <strong>in</strong>direct(beneficial and silent) complicity is more difficult <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e than direct complicity. Toensure non-complicity, it is suggested that corporations make a human rights assessmen<strong>to</strong>f host countries, consider if <strong>the</strong> company has human rights policies protect<strong>in</strong>g workers, orimplement a company moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>to</strong> ensure implementation.The labour provisions state bus<strong>in</strong>esses should: uphold <strong>the</strong> freedom of association and <strong>the</strong>effective recognition of <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g; <strong>the</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ation of all formsof forced and compulsory labour; <strong>the</strong> effective abolition of child labour; and elim<strong>in</strong>atediscrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> respect of employment and occupation. This discussion will focus onforced labour and child labour as <strong>the</strong>y are directly relevant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> discussion of CSEC. 87Forced and compulsory labour occurs <strong>in</strong> different forms, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g slavery or bondedlabour, <strong>the</strong> work or service of prisoners, or child labour where <strong>the</strong> child has no choice butPrivate Sec<strong>to</strong>r Accountability <strong>in</strong> Combat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Commercial Sexual Exploitation of <strong>Child</strong>ren|29
- Page 5 and 6: PRIVATE SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITYIN COM
- Page 7 and 8: 3. Travel and Tourism Sub-Sector 63
- Page 9 and 10: Executive SummarySince the First an
- Page 11 and 12: from the sale of child pornography
- Page 13 and 14: 1.1 Defining Commercial Sexual Expl
- Page 15 and 16: The issue of commercial sexual expl
- Page 17 and 18: 1.2.1 Transnational and multination
- Page 19 and 20: offer stronger protections against,
- Page 21 and 22: 1.3 Defining Corporate Social Respo
- Page 23 and 24: Parliament passed a law requiring a
- Page 25 and 26: 2. International Standards and the
- Page 27 and 28: In terms of international law, the
- Page 29 and 30: alia: establish the grounds for cri
- Page 31 and 32: The ILO Convention No. 138, Concern
- Page 33 and 34: 2.4 Existing Legal Mechanisms to En
- Page 35: 2.4.2 Existing mechanisms for regul
- Page 39: lack of ) monitoring and enforcemen
- Page 42 and 43: who follow relevant international l
- Page 44 and 45: the Commentary references the rule
- Page 46 and 47: 2.4.2.1.2.1 Tripartite DeclarationT
- Page 48 and 49: Unlike the preceding sections, whic
- Page 50 and 51: A major criticism of the Tripartite
- Page 52 and 53: MNEs are asked to respect worker’
- Page 54 and 55: Guidelines voluntary, but non-OECD
- Page 56 and 57: An alternative to the above is to r
- Page 58 and 59: freedom from state interference in
- Page 60 and 61: During the Nuremburg Tribunals, Ger
- Page 62 and 63: ATCA expanded liability for interna
- Page 64 and 65: Pursuant to the holding in Kadic re
- Page 66 and 67: The Court could establish jurisdict
- Page 68 and 69: likely come across similar obstacle
- Page 70 and 71: ecognised by customary internationa
- Page 72 and 73: The report draws together a number
- Page 74 and 75: means of fostering international pe
- Page 76 and 77: a resolution, as well, in which it
- Page 78 and 79: The Swedish document was originally
- Page 80 and 81: services are designed to combat chi
- Page 82 and 83: into contact with individuals who c
- Page 84 and 85: children’s perception of the worl
- Page 86 and 87:
advertisement. The European adverti
- Page 88 and 89:
high-profile case in the US where a
- Page 90 and 91:
child actors have gone on in adulth
- Page 92 and 93:
5. New Technologies Sub-Sector5.1 C
- Page 94 and 95:
North American cases illustrate how
- Page 96 and 97:
With the advent of the social netwo
- Page 98 and 99:
up to $US 500 if they violate the c
- Page 100 and 101:
As the genre is so new, there have
- Page 102 and 103:
- children’s rights advocates, go
- Page 104 and 105:
law enforcement agencies, but equal
- Page 106 and 107:
6. Financial Sub-SectorIt has been
- Page 108 and 109:
law enforcement is having trouble u
- Page 110 and 111:
encourage cooperation and follow-up
- Page 112 and 113:
emedies against all corporations op
- Page 114 and 115:
Another important objective of the
- Page 116 and 117:
Endnotes1 Mark Erik Hecht is an aca
- Page 118 and 119:
35Canada. Industry Canada. Corporat
- Page 120 and 121:
84On 31 Jan. 1999, UN Secretary-Gen
- Page 122 and 123:
110Norms, D.111Norms, point 5. (Rea
- Page 124 and 125:
143Ibid., “General Policies.” P
- Page 126 and 127:
179Ibid., Annex, III: Global Report
- Page 128 and 129:
of the Guidelines).212Ibid., Part I
- Page 130 and 131:
258Ibid.259UNWTO Report to the UN G
- Page 132 and 133:
310Ibid., 12.311Council of Europe,
- Page 134 and 135:
Germany and South Africa, ISPs are
- Page 137:
The World Congress III against Sexu