A major criticism of <strong>the</strong> Tripartite Declaration concerns <strong>the</strong> confidential <strong>in</strong>terpretationprocedure. The <strong>in</strong>terpretation procedure has <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>to</strong> clarify <strong>the</strong> TripartiteDeclaration as situations arise, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account perspectives of three sec<strong>to</strong>rs; however, <strong>in</strong>practice <strong>the</strong> procedure is <strong>in</strong>effective. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> procedure provides limited relief <strong>to</strong>affected parties, <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> procedure is limited <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Tripartite Declaration.Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most important observation concerns <strong>the</strong> confidentiality of <strong>the</strong> procedure. As<strong>the</strong> Tripartite Declaration is a voluntary <strong>in</strong>strument, <strong>the</strong> only available sanction <strong>in</strong>volvespublic perception, boycott<strong>in</strong>g and sham<strong>in</strong>g. The identities of corporations <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>process are kept confidential and are <strong>the</strong>refore shielded from public scrut<strong>in</strong>y and potentialembarrassment.The Tripartite Declaration refers <strong>to</strong> a long list of ILO Conventions; for member-statesthat have ratified <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong>se conventions are non-voluntary. However, as <strong>the</strong> TripartiteDeclaration is not drafted <strong>in</strong> compulsory language, <strong>the</strong> obligations it creates are not legallyb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g on MNEs. This language, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a lack of moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g and implementationmechanisms, and limited dispute resolution creates a mere aspirational declaration withoutany legal mandate. Implementation of <strong>the</strong> Tripartite Declaration depends on states <strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>strument domestically, NGOs <strong>to</strong> promote <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>strument and campaignfor its <strong>in</strong>corporation and MNEs <strong>to</strong> adhere <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> obligations. The legal impact is fur<strong>the</strong>rlessened by <strong>the</strong> Declaration’s declaration of <strong>the</strong> primacy of national laws. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, itcan be argued that <strong>the</strong> ILO is unable <strong>to</strong> prevent host states from adopt<strong>in</strong>g lax labour andenvironmental standards, and TNCs cannot be condemned for tak<strong>in</strong>g advantage of suchstandards.While <strong>the</strong> argument could be made that <strong>the</strong> tripartite structure of <strong>the</strong> Tripartite Declarationis its strongest attribute, <strong>in</strong> that it articulates a role for all three parties; an argumentcan be made that it is also a weakness. For example, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretationprocedure, only two of <strong>the</strong> four receivable requests passed unanimously and concludes thisdemonstrates how difficult it is for <strong>the</strong> three officers represent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three different partieswith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ILO <strong>to</strong> reach an agreement. It is perhaps over-reach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> state commenta<strong>to</strong>rshave criticised <strong>the</strong> Tripartite Structure as <strong>in</strong>effective; however, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of decisionmak<strong>in</strong>g,it is fair <strong>to</strong> argue that <strong>the</strong> tripartite structure creates some obstacles.2.4.2.1.3 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development <strong>in</strong>itiativesIn 1976, <strong>the</strong> OECD published its Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises 184 as an annex<strong>to</strong> its Declaration on International Investment and Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises. 185 It is a se<strong>to</strong>f recommendations addressed <strong>to</strong> MNEs <strong>to</strong> provide standards for ‘responsible bus<strong>in</strong>essconduct.’ 186 The Guidel<strong>in</strong>es aim <strong>to</strong> encourage MNEs <strong>to</strong> make positive contributions <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> social, economic and environmental welfare <strong>in</strong> terri<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y operate. 18742|Private Sec<strong>to</strong>r Accountability <strong>in</strong> Combat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Commercial Sexual Exploitation of <strong>Child</strong>ren
Orig<strong>in</strong>ally address<strong>in</strong>g only mult<strong>in</strong>ationals, <strong>the</strong> 2000 review extended <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>to</strong> alsocover domestic enterprises. The Guidel<strong>in</strong>es are not legally b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g on MNEs, howeveradher<strong>in</strong>g states have agreed <strong>to</strong> implement and encourage corporations operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>, orfrom <strong>the</strong>ir states, <strong>to</strong> observe <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.The Guidel<strong>in</strong>es develop through pr<strong>in</strong>ciples separated by ten head<strong>in</strong>gs. The Guidel<strong>in</strong>esare <strong>the</strong>n divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> ten sections: Concepts and Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples; General Policies; Disclosure;Employment and Industrial Relations; Environment; Combat<strong>in</strong>g Bribery; ConsumerInterests; Science and Technology; Competition; and Taxation. 188 Similar <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> TripartiteDeclaration, some pr<strong>in</strong>ciples have been clarified by <strong>the</strong> Committee on InternationalInvestments and Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises (CIIME), mean<strong>in</strong>g, CIIME has <strong>in</strong>terpretedhow certa<strong>in</strong> provisions should be unders<strong>to</strong>od. Unlike <strong>the</strong> Tripartite Declaration, clarifications“… do not modify <strong>the</strong> authoritive texts […].” 189 For this reason, <strong>the</strong> Clarifications will notbe explored. The Guidel<strong>in</strong>es are also supplemented by a commentary, agreed <strong>to</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>2000 Review. The Commentary expla<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es and Implementation procedurebut is not part of <strong>the</strong> Declaration. 190 The Commentary will be explored <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent thatit clarifies MNEs obligations under <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es.The Guidel<strong>in</strong>es conta<strong>in</strong> two foundational sections, through which <strong>the</strong> substantive sectionsare <strong>to</strong> be read: Concepts and Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples 191 and General Policies. 192 In nei<strong>the</strong>r section isMNE def<strong>in</strong>ed; however, like <strong>the</strong> Tripartite Declaration, elements of MNEs are provided. 193Importantly, <strong>the</strong> primacy of national law and policy of host countries is established. 194With<strong>in</strong> this framework, MNEs are given a role <strong>in</strong> economic, social and local development. 195Notably, MNEs are asked <strong>to</strong> “[c]ontribute <strong>to</strong> economic, social and environmental progresswith a view <strong>to</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able development[,]” 196 “[r]espect <strong>the</strong> human rights ofthose affected by <strong>the</strong>ir activities […]” 197 and “[e]ncourage local capacity build<strong>in</strong>g [… ].” 198F<strong>in</strong>ally, MNEs and host governments are encouraged <strong>to</strong> cooperate when resolv<strong>in</strong>gconflicts <strong>in</strong> obligations. 199 The Commentary extends co-operation <strong>to</strong> a partnership <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>development and implementation of policies and laws. 200The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples established <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundational sections <strong>in</strong>form, and are fur<strong>the</strong>r developedby, <strong>the</strong> substantive pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. The first relevant and substantive section, employmentand <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations, focuses on worker’s rights regard<strong>in</strong>g collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g andrepresentation; occupational health and safety; employee tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g; and reasonable noticeof major changes. Although significantly less detailed, it is <strong>the</strong> human rights provision,added <strong>in</strong> 2000, which is more relevant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> discussion. 201The human rights provision consists of four short pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, prefaced by a “chapeau”referenc<strong>in</strong>g ‘applicable law, regulations and prevail<strong>in</strong>g relations and employment practices.’ 202Private Sec<strong>to</strong>r Accountability <strong>in</strong> Combat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Commercial Sexual Exploitation of <strong>Child</strong>ren|43
- Page 5 and 6: PRIVATE SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITYIN COM
- Page 7 and 8: 3. Travel and Tourism Sub-Sector 63
- Page 9 and 10: Executive SummarySince the First an
- Page 11 and 12: from the sale of child pornography
- Page 13 and 14: 1.1 Defining Commercial Sexual Expl
- Page 15 and 16: The issue of commercial sexual expl
- Page 17 and 18: 1.2.1 Transnational and multination
- Page 19 and 20: offer stronger protections against,
- Page 21 and 22: 1.3 Defining Corporate Social Respo
- Page 23 and 24: Parliament passed a law requiring a
- Page 25 and 26: 2. International Standards and the
- Page 27 and 28: In terms of international law, the
- Page 29 and 30: alia: establish the grounds for cri
- Page 31 and 32: The ILO Convention No. 138, Concern
- Page 33 and 34: 2.4 Existing Legal Mechanisms to En
- Page 35 and 36: 2.4.2 Existing mechanisms for regul
- Page 37 and 38: Governments play an auxiliary role
- Page 39: lack of ) monitoring and enforcemen
- Page 42 and 43: who follow relevant international l
- Page 44 and 45: the Commentary references the rule
- Page 46 and 47: 2.4.2.1.2.1 Tripartite DeclarationT
- Page 48 and 49: Unlike the preceding sections, whic
- Page 52 and 53: MNEs are asked to respect worker’
- Page 54 and 55: Guidelines voluntary, but non-OECD
- Page 56 and 57: An alternative to the above is to r
- Page 58 and 59: freedom from state interference in
- Page 60 and 61: During the Nuremburg Tribunals, Ger
- Page 62 and 63: ATCA expanded liability for interna
- Page 64 and 65: Pursuant to the holding in Kadic re
- Page 66 and 67: The Court could establish jurisdict
- Page 68 and 69: likely come across similar obstacle
- Page 70 and 71: ecognised by customary internationa
- Page 72 and 73: The report draws together a number
- Page 74 and 75: means of fostering international pe
- Page 76 and 77: a resolution, as well, in which it
- Page 78 and 79: The Swedish document was originally
- Page 80 and 81: services are designed to combat chi
- Page 82 and 83: into contact with individuals who c
- Page 84 and 85: children’s perception of the worl
- Page 86 and 87: advertisement. The European adverti
- Page 88 and 89: high-profile case in the US where a
- Page 90 and 91: child actors have gone on in adulth
- Page 92 and 93: 5. New Technologies Sub-Sector5.1 C
- Page 94 and 95: North American cases illustrate how
- Page 96 and 97: With the advent of the social netwo
- Page 98 and 99: up to $US 500 if they violate the c
- Page 100 and 101:
As the genre is so new, there have
- Page 102 and 103:
- children’s rights advocates, go
- Page 104 and 105:
law enforcement agencies, but equal
- Page 106 and 107:
6. Financial Sub-SectorIt has been
- Page 108 and 109:
law enforcement is having trouble u
- Page 110 and 111:
encourage cooperation and follow-up
- Page 112 and 113:
emedies against all corporations op
- Page 114 and 115:
Another important objective of the
- Page 116 and 117:
Endnotes1 Mark Erik Hecht is an aca
- Page 118 and 119:
35Canada. Industry Canada. Corporat
- Page 120 and 121:
84On 31 Jan. 1999, UN Secretary-Gen
- Page 122 and 123:
110Norms, D.111Norms, point 5. (Rea
- Page 124 and 125:
143Ibid., “General Policies.” P
- Page 126 and 127:
179Ibid., Annex, III: Global Report
- Page 128 and 129:
of the Guidelines).212Ibid., Part I
- Page 130 and 131:
258Ibid.259UNWTO Report to the UN G
- Page 132 and 133:
310Ibid., 12.311Council of Europe,
- Page 134 and 135:
Germany and South Africa, ISPs are
- Page 137:
The World Congress III against Sexu