12.07.2015 Views

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in the cable; this minimizes the amount of reflection. The othermethod is to connect the amplifier to the antenna using a typeof wire or cable that does not strongly absorb the waves. Partialreflection then becomes irrelevant, since all the wave energy willeventually exit through the antenna.Discussion QuestionsA A sound wave that underwent a pressure-inverting reflection wouldhave its compressions converted to expansions <strong>and</strong> vice versa. Howwould its energy <strong>and</strong> frequency compare with those of the original sound?Would it sound any different? What happens if you swap the two wireswhere they connect to a stereo speaker, resulting in waves that vibrate inthe opposite way?6.2.2 Quantitative treatment of reflectionIn this subsection we analyze the reasons why reflections occur ata speed-changing boundary, predict quantitatively the intensities ofreflection <strong>and</strong> transmission, <strong>and</strong> discuss how to predict for any typeof wave which reflections are inverting <strong>and</strong> which are uninverting.Why reflection occursTo underst<strong>and</strong> the fundamental reasons for what does occur atthe boundary between media, let’s first discuss what doesn’t happen.For the sake of concreteness, consider a sinusoidal wave on a string.If the wave progresses from a heavier portion of the string, in whichits velocity is low, to a lighter-weight part, in which it is high, thenthe equation v = fλ tells us that it must change its frequency, orits wavelength, or both. If only the frequency changed, then theparts of the wave in the two different portions of the string wouldquickly get out of step with each other, producing a discontinuity inthe wave, g/1. This is unphysical, so we know that the wavelengthmust change while the frequency remains constant, g/2.But there is still something unphysical about figure g/2. Thesudden change in the shape of the wave has resulted in a sharp kinkat the boundary. This can’t really happen, because the mediumtends to accelerate in such a way as to eliminate curvature. A sharpkink corresponds to an infinite curvature at one point, which wouldproduce an infinite acceleration, which would not be consistent withthe smooth pattern of wave motion envisioned in fig. g/2. Wavescan have kinks, but not stationary kinks.We conclude that without positing partial reflection of the wave,we cannot simultaneously satisfy the requirements of (1) continuityof the wave, <strong>and</strong> (2) no sudden changes in the slope of the wave. Inother words, we assume that both the wave <strong>and</strong> its derivative arecontinuous functions.)Does this amount to a proof that reflection occurs? Not quite.We have only proved that certain types of wave motion are notg / 1. A change in frequencywithout a change in wavelengthwould produce a discontinuity inthe wave. 2. A simple change inwavelength without a reflectionwould result in a sharp kink in thewave.Section 6.2 Bounded Waves 365

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!