Simple Nature - Light and Matter

C Thomson found that the m/q of an electron was thousands of timessmaller than that of charged atoms in chemical solutions. Would this implythat the electrons had more charge? Less mass? Would there be no wayto tell? Explain. Remember that Millikan’s results were still many years inthe future, so q was unknown.D Can you guess any practical reason why Thomson couldn’t justlet one electron fly across the gap before disconnecting the battery andturning off the beam, and then measure the amount of charge depositedon the anode, thus allowing him to measure the charge of a single electrondirectly?E Why is it not possible to determine m and q themselves, rather thanjust their ratio, by observing electrons’ motion in electric and magneticfields?8.1.6 The raisin cookie model of the atoml / The raisin cookie model ofthe atom with four units ofcharge, which we now know to beberyllium.Based on his experiments, Thomson proposed a picture of theatom which became known as the raisin cookie model. In the neutralatom, l, there are four electrons with a total charge of −4e, sitting ina sphere (the “cookie”) with a charge of +4e spread throughout it.It was known that chemical reactions could not change one elementinto another, so in Thomson’s scenario, each element’s cookie spherehad a permanently fixed radius, mass, and positive charge, differentfrom those of other elements. The electrons, however, were not apermanent feature of the atom, and could be tacked on or pulled outto make charged ions. Although we now know, for instance, that aneutral atom with four electrons is the element beryllium, scientistsat the time did not know how many electrons the various neutralatoms possessed.This model is clearly different from the one you’ve learned ingrade school or through popular culture, where the positive chargeis concentrated in a tiny nucleus at the atom’s center. An equallyimportant change in ideas about the atom has been the realizationthat atoms and their constituent subatomic particles behave entirelydifferently from objects on the human scale. For instance, we’ll seelater that an electron can be in more than one place at one time.The raisin cookie model was part of a long tradition of attemptsto make mechanical models of phenomena, and Thomson and hiscontemporaries never questioned the appropriateness of building amental model of an atom as a machine with little parts inside. Today,mechanical models of atoms are still used (for instance thetinker-toy-style molecular modeling kits like the ones used by Watsonand Crick to figure out the double helix structure of DNA), butscientists realize that the physical objects are only aids to help ourbrains’ symbolic and visual processes think about atoms.Although there was no clear-cut experimental evidence for manyof the details of the raisin cookie model, physicists went ahead andstarted working out its implications. For instance, suppose you had472 Chapter 8 Atoms and Electromagnetism