12.07.2015 Views

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

g / Three types of transformations that preserve parallelism. Theirdistinguishing feature is what they do to simultaneity, as shown by whathappens to the left edge of the original rectangle. In I, the left edgeremains vertical, so simultaneous events remain simultaneous. In II, theleft edge turns counterclockwise. In III, it turns clockwise.h / In the units that are mostconvenient for relativity, the transformationhas symmetry about a45-degree diagonal line.i / Interpretation of the Lorentztransformation. The slope indicatedin the figure gives therelative velocity of the two framesof reference. Events A <strong>and</strong> B thatwere simultaneous in frame 1are not simultaneous in frame 2,where event A occurs to the rightof the t = 0 line represented bythe left edge of the grid, but eventB occurs to its left.portional to v, then for large enough velocities the grid would haveleft <strong>and</strong> right reversed, <strong>and</strong> this would violate property 4, causality:one observer would say that event A caused a later event B, butanother observer would say that B came first <strong>and</strong> caused A.The only remaining possibility is case III, which I’ve redrawnin figure h with a couple of changes. This is the one that Einsteinpredicted in 1905. The transformation is known as the Lorentztransformation, after Hendrik Lorentz (1853-1928), who partiallyanticipated Einstein’s work, without arriving at the correct interpretation.The distortion is a kind of smooshing <strong>and</strong> stretching,as suggested by the h<strong>and</strong>s. Also, we’ve already seen in figures a-con page 385 that we’re free to stretch or compress everything asmuch as we like in the horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical directions, becausethis simply corresponds to choosing different units of measurementfor time <strong>and</strong> distance. In figure h I’ve chosen units that give thewhole drawing a convenient symmetry about a 45-degree diagonalline. Ordinarily it wouldn’t make sense to talk about a 45-degreeangle on a graph whose axes had different units. But in relativity,the symmetric appearance of the transformation tells us that space<strong>and</strong> time ought to be treated on the same footing, <strong>and</strong> measured inthe same units.As in our discussion of the Galilean transformation, slopes areinterpreted as velocities, <strong>and</strong> the slope of the near-horizontal linesin figure i is interpreted as the relative velocity of the two observers.The difference between the Galilean version <strong>and</strong> the relativistic oneis that now there is smooshing happening from the other side aswell. Lines that were vertical in the original grid, representing simultaneousevents, now slant over to the right. This tells us that, asrequired by property 5, different observers do not agree on whetherevents that occur in different places are simultaneous. The Hafele-Keating experiment tells us that this non-simultaneity effect is fairlysmall, even when the velocity is as big as that of a passenger jet,<strong>and</strong> this is what we would have anticipated by the correspondenceprinciple. The way that this is expressed in the graph is that if we388 Chapter 7 Relativity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!