12.07.2015 Views

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.1.2 The magnetic fieldDefinition in terms of the force on a moving particleWith electricity, it turned out to be useful to define an electricfield rather than always working in terms of electric forces. Likewise,we want to define a magnetic field, B. Let’s look at the result ofthe preceding subsection for insight. The equationF = 2kIqvc 2 Rshows that when we put a moving charge near other moving charges,there is an extra magnetic force on it, in addition to any electricforces that may exist. Equations for electric forces always have afactor of k in front — the Coulomb constant k is called the couplingconstant for electric forces. Since magnetic effects are relativisticin origin, they end up having a factor of k/c 2 instead of just k.In a world where the speed of light was infinite, relativistic effects,including magnetism, would be absent, <strong>and</strong> the coupling constantfor magnetism would be zero. A cute feature of the metric system isthat we have k/c 2 = 10 −7 N·s 2 /C 2 exactly, as a matter of definition.Naively, we could try to work by analogy with the electric field,<strong>and</strong> define the magnetic field as the magnetic force per unit charge.However, if we think of the lone charge in our example as the testcharge, we’ll find that this approach fails, because the force dependsnot just on the test particle’s charge, but on its velocity, v, as well.Although we only carried out calculations for the case where theparticle was moving parallel to the wire, in general this velocity isa vector, v, in three dimensions. We can also anticipate that themagnetic field will be a vector. The electric <strong>and</strong> gravitational fieldsare vectors, <strong>and</strong> we expect intuitively based on our experience withmagnetic compasses that a magnetic field has a particular directionin space. Furthermore, reversing the current I in our example wouldhave reversed the force, which would only make sense if the magneticfield had a direction in space that could be reversed. Summarizing,we think there must be a magnetic field vector B, <strong>and</strong> the forceon a test particle moving through a magnetic field is proportionalboth to the B vector <strong>and</strong> to the particle’s own v vector. In otherwords, the magnetic force vector F is found by some sort of vectormultiplication of the vectors v <strong>and</strong> B. As proved on page 912,however, there is only one physically useful way of defining such amultiplication, which is the cross product.We therefore define the magnetic field vector, B, as the vector thatdetermines the force on a charged particle according to the followingrule:F = qv × B [definition of the magnetic field]d / The right-h<strong>and</strong> relationshipbetween the velocity of apositively charged particle, themagnetic field through which it ismoving, <strong>and</strong> the magnetic forceon it.e / The unit of magnetic field,the tesla, is named after Serbian-American inventor Nikola Tesla.From this definition, we see that the magnetic field’s units areSection 11.1 More About the Magnetic Field 651

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!