12.07.2015 Views

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

Simple Nature - Light and Matter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

We know from our discussion of the scaling of diffraction thatthere must be some equation that relates an angle like θ Z to theratio λ/d,λd ↔ θ Z .If the equation for θ Z depended on some other expression such asλ + d or λ 2 /d, then it would change when we scaled λ <strong>and</strong> d by thesame factor, which would violate what we know about the scalingof diffraction.Along the central maximum line, X, we always have positivewaves coinciding with positive ones <strong>and</strong> negative waves coincidingwith negative ones. (I have arbitrarily chosen to take a snapshot ofthe pattern at a moment when the waves emerging from the slit areexperiencing a positive peak.) The superposition of the two sets ofripples therefore results in a doubling of the wave amplitude alongthis line. There is constructive interference. This is easy to explain,because by symmetry, each wave has had to travel an equal numberof wavelengths to get from its slit to the center line, m: Becauseboth sets of ripples have ten wavelengths to cover in order to reachthe point along direction X, they will be in step when they get there.At the point along direction Y shown in the same figure, onewave has traveled ten wavelengths, <strong>and</strong> is therefore at a positiveextreme, but the other has traveled only nine <strong>and</strong> a half wavelengths,so it at a negative extreme. There is perfect cancellation, so pointsalong this line experience no wave motion.But the distance traveled does not have to be equal in order toget constructive interference. At the point along direction Z, onewave has gone nine wavelengths <strong>and</strong> the other ten. They are bothat a positive extreme.self-check HAt a point half a wavelength below the point marked along direction X,carry out a similar analysis. ⊲ Answer, p. 928To summarize, we will have perfect constructive interference atany point where the distance to one slit differs from the distance tothe other slit by an integer number of wavelengths. Perfect destructiveinterference will occur when the number of wavelengths of pathlength difference equals an integer plus a half.Now we are ready to find the equation that predicts the anglesof the maxima <strong>and</strong> minima. The waves travel different distancesto get to the same point in space, n. We need to find whether thewaves are in phase (in step) or out of phase at this point in order topredict whether there will be constructive interference, destructiveinterference, or something in between.One of our basic assumptions in this chapter is that we will onlybe dealing with the diffracted wave in regions very far away from then / The waves travel distances L<strong>and</strong> L ′ from the two slits to getto the same point in space, at anangle θ from the center line.o / A close-up view of figuren, showing how the path lengthdifference L − L ′ is related to d<strong>and</strong> to the angle θ.Section 12.5 Wave Optics 787

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!