e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Sixth WG meeting to discuss policy implications(9 September 2004)• Preparation for the submission of the final report on theMEWC-OUM E-learning Readiness Study to MEWC(September-November 2004)Several members of the WG from Phase I were invited to view thefindings, provide recommendations and suggest policy initiatives duringa three and a half day workshop between 26 th and 30 th August 2004. Therecommendations by the Working Group were incorporated into the finalreport submitted to MEWC.The findings and recommendations of the study were presented tomembers of the National Consultative Committee on E-learning (seeAppendix A).1.4.5 Operational DefinitionsThe definitions of the terms used to describe the (a) target respondentsand (b) the areas of readiness surveyed are given below. It is to be notedthat the definition of E-Learning had been operationalised by the WorkingGroup as follows: as the use of network and multimedia technologies toimprove the quality of learning by enabling access to knowledge andremote resources for the development of a K-society.(a) Target RespondentsEnablerAn individual who enables/facilitates the delivery and implementation ofE-learning programmes e.g. lecturers, tutors, facilitators in public andprivate higher education institutions (IPTA/IPTS).Policy MakerAn individual in higher management in charge of formulating orimplementing policies related to training and instruction e.g. CEO,President, Executive Director, Managing Director, General Manager of acompany; Vice Chancellor, Deputy Vice Chancellor, Director, Head of adepartment or educational institution at the tertiary level.ProviderAn individual or an organisation that provides or sells E-learning contentand/or technology services to target institutions/learners.ReceiverAn individual who is a learner/trainee enrolled in an educational/traininginstitution for tertiary education or attending an in-service course.Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 11
(b) Area of Readiness:Content ReadinessThis refers to the variety and availability of appropriate E-learningmaterials. Basically it is how ready the institution/organisation is in termsof providing content for E-learning as perceived by the providers,enablers and learners/trainees.Cultural ReadinessThe enculturation of E-learning in terms of Internet use and networkedtechnologies to disseminate information, communication, interaction andteaching. Basically it is how the institution/organisation is ready toenculturate E-learning as a mode for teaching and learning as perceivedby the policy makers, enablers and learners/trainees.Environmental ReadinessThis refers to the readiness of the country as a whole in terms of thepresence of government policy, the role of mass media, intellectualproperty regulations and proficiency in the English language. It refers toa readiness of a society/nation for E-learning as perceived by the policymakers, providers, enablers and learners/trainees.Financial ReadinessThis refers to learner/trainee and institutional/organisational readiness tospend or allocate funds to develop and/or acquire E-learning. It generallyrefers to whether a learner/trainee or institution/organisation is finaciallyready for E-learning programmes as perceived by policy makers, enablers,and learners/trainees.Learner ReadinessThis refers to the readiness of the learner or trainee in terms of timecommitment to E-learning, discipline and interest in E-learning as well asperception of the status of qualifications obtained via E-learning.Management ReadinessThis refers to the institution/organisation having a vision/mission orformulated policies related to the provision of E-learning and theinstitutional/organisational recognition of qualifications obtained via E-learning.Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 12
Page 1 and 2: e-learning readinesse-learningMalay
Page 3 and 4: E-LEARNING READINESSIN MALAYSIA 200
Page 5 and 6: E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
Page 13 and 14: application of ICT to pave the way
Page 15 and 16: University College, lecturers are e
Page 17 and 18: 1. The promotion of information flu
Page 19 and 20: 1.4.1 The ELR InstrumentFour instru
Page 21: 1.4.3 The RespondentsThe respondent
Page 25 and 26: 2POLICY MAKERS ANDORGANISATIONSThis
Page 27 and 28: TABLE 2. Demographic Profile of Pol
Page 29 and 30: surveyed (including one policy make
Page 31 and 32: According to the data in Table 8 wh
Page 33 and 34: difference, however, can be observe
Page 35 and 36: Level of Overall Readiness among Po
Page 37 and 38: 2019.616.7Percent1512.813.7106.95.9
Page 39 and 40: 3PROVIDERSThis chapter presents the
Page 41 and 42: adequate for achieving the ideal ba
Page 43 and 44: TABLE 17. Provision of Applications
Page 45 and 46: TABLE 20. Preference for Single poi
Page 47 and 48: expertise to develop content for E-
Page 49 and 50: Finally, it was suggested that step
Page 51 and 52: According to a respondent, one of t
Page 53 and 54: In terms of financial readiness, th
Page 55 and 56: TABLE 28. Level of Overall Readines
Page 57 and 58: 2524.02017.315Percent1012.013.310.7
Page 59 and 60: 201516.4415.0716.4415.07Percent1010
Page 61 and 62: 4ENABLERSThis section presents find
Page 63 and 64: month. This shows that, in general,
Page 65 and 66: As shown in Table 33, the top three
Page 67 and 68: learner-centred and therefore learn
Page 69 and 70: addressed. Further, enablers felt t
Page 71 and 72: Although most enablers acknowledge
Page 73 and 74:
greater usage for E-learning. In ad
Page 75 and 76:
Level of Overall Readiness among En
Page 77 and 78:
2017.518.51514.913.8FIGURE 17. Over
Page 79 and 80:
252020.017.6 17.0Percent1512.612.61
Page 81 and 82:
5RECEIVERSThis section reports the
Page 83 and 84:
Refer to Table 48 for data on the t
Page 85 and 86:
percent). Other uses of the compute
Page 87 and 88:
used it for emailing. The use of th
Page 89 and 90:
order to be a successful e-learner,
Page 91 and 92:
The open-ended responses yielded a
Page 93 and 94:
to the Internet as well as, bandwid
Page 95 and 96:
TABLE 66. Receivers’ Perceptions
Page 97 and 98:
E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
Page 99 and 100:
2524.620Percent1514.515.5 15.9108.5
Page 101 and 102:
2523.72017.7 17.2Percent1513.7108.8
Page 103 and 104:
6SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONSThis ch
Page 105 and 106:
TABLE 71. Areas of Readiness among
Page 107 and 108:
financial readiness. This may refle
Page 109 and 110:
TABLE 72. Summary of Findings (cont
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
(c) Employ a core team of personnel
Page 117 and 118:
(f) Give incentives to companies th
Page 119 and 120:
h) Recognise qualifications acquire
Page 121 and 122:
AppendixesJoint Study by MEWC and O
Page 123 and 124:
ChairpersonChief Secretary, Ministr
Page 125 and 126:
OUM Committee on E-learning Readine
Page 127 and 128:
Phase I (January - April 2004)Head,
Page 129 and 130:
Rohani IsmailManagerTechnology Assi
Page 131 and 132:
Phase III (August - October 2004)He
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix EList of Major Respondents
Page 135 and 136:
33. Universiti Sains Malaysia34. Un
Page 137 and 138:
A Study on E-learning Readiness in
Page 139 and 140:
D. Environmental Readiness Yes No1.
Page 141 and 142:
A Study on E-learning Readiness in
Page 143 and 144:
Instruction: Please respond to the
Page 145 and 146:
Appendix HSurvey Instrument for Ena
Page 147 and 148:
8. Do you use a computer?ٱNever ٱ
Page 149 and 150:
15. My organisation/institution pro
Page 151 and 152:
Appendix ISurvey Instrument for Rec
Page 153 and 154:
4. I am enrolled/attending an in-se
Page 155 and 156:
13. Do you have Internet connection
Page 157 and 158:
15. Content for E-learning is appro
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix JBiodata of the Working Gr
Page 161 and 162:
Currently Fitri is on study leave a
Page 163 and 164:
project. Currently, her focus is to
Page 165 and 166:
Rohani IsmailRohani Ismail has grad
Page 167:
Prior to that, she was a Curriculum
show all

e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?