e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3.4 SummaryThis chapter presented the varying levels of readiness among E-learningproviders in Malaysia. It may be concluded that these providers arereasonably ready, or have been ready to embark on E-learning due to thefollowing reasons:1. Personnel readinessA majority of providers who participated in this survey declaredthat their organisation either has a central unit which iscommitted towards developing E-learning or a dedicated team toimplement E-learning. This unit or team also comprisesinstructional designers. In addition, the respective organisationshave a staff development plan for E-learning which reflects thesignificance of E-learning personnel.2. Content readinessMost providers believe that they are capable of developing E-learning content. The providers claimed that the E-learningcontent, which was either developed in house or outsourcedlocally, is adequate for their respective organisations. A majorityalso stressed that they already have internal expertise to developE-learning content.3. Technical readinessMost providers stated that their organisations have adequatetechnical infrastructure, facilities and services to successfullydevelop and/or deliver E-learning. A majority of these E-learningproviders already have Intranet and Internet technologies,broadband facilities, and also Learning Management Systems inplace for E-learning delivery. The respondents were highlypositive about the readiness of their organisations.Although these E-learning providers perceived that they are ready, orhave been ready to go into E-learning, in terms of personnel, content andtechnical readiness, they were also discouraged about the levels ofreadiness brought about by environmental and financial factors. Themixed perceptions are healthy, as they indicate the sensitivity andawareness of these E-learning providers towards elements that work andneed to work, to ensure that E-learning deployment is effective and of ahigh quality.Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 49
4ENABLERSThis section presents findings on the extent to which enablers (tutors,lecturers and trainers) are ready to deliver E-learning.4.1 Demographic ProfileThe demographic profile of the enablers is shown in Table 29. The totalnumber of enablers who responded to this study was 977, out of which522 (53.3 percent) were males and 451 (46.2 percent) were females. Themajority (37.8 percent) of the respondents were from the 31 to 40 agegroup. Another 28.2 percent were from the 41 to 50 age group; 23.9percent were less than 30 years old and the rest (9.8 percent) were morethan 51 years old.In terms of positions held, most of the respondents (90.2 percent) wereprofessors, lecturers, tutors or teachers and a very small group of trainers(1.9 percent) and DAGS recipients (0.5 percent). The enablers werepredominantly from educational institutions (92.2 percent). The rest werefrom government agencies (3.9 percent) and private organisations (2.6percent). The main type of educational institution was public colleges oruniversities (55.6 percent) followed by private colleges or universities(29.3 percent). Training institutions made up 3.4 percent while the rest(4.9 percent) were from other types of institutions. The organisationswere located mainly in cities (49.4 percent) and towns (48.9 percent).TABLE 29. Demographic Profile of EnablersGenderDescriptionFrequency(N = 977)Percentage(%)Male 522 53.4Female 451 46.2Missing value 4 0.4Total 977 100Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 50
Page 1 and 2:
e-learning readinesse-learningMalay
Page 3 and 4:
E-LEARNING READINESSIN MALAYSIA 200
Page 5 and 6:
E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
Page 7 and 8:
E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
Page 9 and 10: E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
Page 13 and 14: application of ICT to pave the way
Page 15 and 16: University College, lecturers are e
Page 17 and 18: 1. The promotion of information flu
Page 19 and 20: 1.4.1 The ELR InstrumentFour instru
Page 21 and 22: 1.4.3 The RespondentsThe respondent
Page 23 and 24: (b) Area of Readiness:Content Readi
Page 25 and 26: 2POLICY MAKERS ANDORGANISATIONSThis
Page 27 and 28: TABLE 2. Demographic Profile of Pol
Page 29 and 30: surveyed (including one policy make
Page 31 and 32: According to the data in Table 8 wh
Page 33 and 34: difference, however, can be observe
Page 35 and 36: Level of Overall Readiness among Po
Page 37 and 38: 2019.616.7Percent1512.813.7106.95.9
Page 39 and 40: 3PROVIDERSThis chapter presents the
Page 41 and 42: adequate for achieving the ideal ba
Page 43 and 44: TABLE 17. Provision of Applications
Page 45 and 46: TABLE 20. Preference for Single poi
Page 47 and 48: expertise to develop content for E-
Page 49 and 50: Finally, it was suggested that step
Page 51 and 52: According to a respondent, one of t
Page 53 and 54: In terms of financial readiness, th
Page 55 and 56: TABLE 28. Level of Overall Readines
Page 57 and 58: 2524.02017.315Percent1012.013.310.7
Page 59: 201516.4415.0716.4415.07Percent1010
Page 63 and 64: month. This shows that, in general,
Page 65 and 66: As shown in Table 33, the top three
Page 67 and 68: learner-centred and therefore learn
Page 69 and 70: addressed. Further, enablers felt t
Page 71 and 72: Although most enablers acknowledge
Page 73 and 74: greater usage for E-learning. In ad
Page 75 and 76: Level of Overall Readiness among En
Page 77 and 78: 2017.518.51514.913.8FIGURE 17. Over
Page 79 and 80: 252020.017.6 17.0Percent1512.612.61
Page 81 and 82: 5RECEIVERSThis section reports the
Page 83 and 84: Refer to Table 48 for data on the t
Page 85 and 86: percent). Other uses of the compute
Page 87 and 88: used it for emailing. The use of th
Page 89 and 90: order to be a successful e-learner,
Page 91 and 92: The open-ended responses yielded a
Page 93 and 94: to the Internet as well as, bandwid
Page 95 and 96: TABLE 66. Receivers’ Perceptions
Page 99 and 100: 2524.620Percent1514.515.5 15.9108.5
Page 101 and 102: 2523.72017.7 17.2Percent1513.7108.8
Page 103 and 104: 6SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONSThis ch
Page 105 and 106: TABLE 71. Areas of Readiness among
Page 107 and 108: financial readiness. This may refle
Page 109 and 110: TABLE 72. Summary of Findings (cont
Page 111 and 112:
TABLE 72. Summary of Findings (cont
Page 113 and 114:
TABLE 72. Summary of Findings (cont
Page 115 and 116:
(c) Employ a core team of personnel
Page 117 and 118:
(f) Give incentives to companies th
Page 119 and 120:
h) Recognise qualifications acquire
Page 121 and 122:
AppendixesJoint Study by MEWC and O
Page 123 and 124:
ChairpersonChief Secretary, Ministr
Page 125 and 126:
OUM Committee on E-learning Readine
Page 127 and 128:
Phase I (January - April 2004)Head,
Page 129 and 130:
Rohani IsmailManagerTechnology Assi
Page 131 and 132:
Phase III (August - October 2004)He
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix EList of Major Respondents
Page 135 and 136:
33. Universiti Sains Malaysia34. Un
Page 137 and 138:
A Study on E-learning Readiness in
Page 139 and 140:
D. Environmental Readiness Yes No1.
Page 141 and 142:
A Study on E-learning Readiness in
Page 143 and 144:
Instruction: Please respond to the
Page 145 and 146:
Appendix HSurvey Instrument for Ena
Page 147 and 148:
8. Do you use a computer?ٱNever ٱ
Page 149 and 150:
15. My organisation/institution pro
Page 151 and 152:
Appendix ISurvey Instrument for Rec
Page 153 and 154:
4. I am enrolled/attending an in-se
Page 155 and 156:
13. Do you have Internet connection
Page 157 and 158:
15. Content for E-learning is appro
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix JBiodata of the Working Gr
Page 161 and 162:
Currently Fitri is on study leave a
Page 163 and 164:
project. Currently, her focus is to
Page 165 and 166:
Rohani IsmailRohani Ismail has grad
Page 167:
Prior to that, she was a Curriculum
show all

e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?