e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4.4 SummaryFrom this study, it can be concluded that generally, the enablers have apositive attitude towards E-learning. This is reflected in the highpercentage of enablers that have access to a computer with Internetfacilities, and are using it on a daily basis. However, the enablers felt thatE-learning is best used together with the printed mode and the moreconventional face-to-face mode of interaction.Overall, the enablers perceived that the readiness of each of the eightdimensions is at a moderate level. The factors which appear to impedethe overall readiness as highlighted by the enablers include:a. the poor recognition of qualifications obtained via E-learning;b. the perceived lack of effectiveness of its use in specialized andtechnical subjects;c. insufficient software, hardware and other computer relatedequipment;d. the lack of availability of Internet access, especially in ruralareas;e. accessibility and last-mile problems when using the Internet;f. the high financial demands on learners in acquiringcomputers and using Internet in E-learning;g. insufficient E-learning content;h. the lack of proficiency in the English Language amonglearners;i. the lack of training on E-learning for enablers; andj. the lack of aggressiveness on the part of the authoritiesconcerned in disseminating information on E-learning as wellas inculcating the culture of E-learning amongst Malaysians.On a positive note, cultural readiness was accorded the highest rating bythe enablers. This is most probably due to their strong belief that E-learning is an advanced mode of teaching and learning as well as anefficient way of sharing information. On the other hand, they feltapprehensive about the use of E-learning as the sole mode of instruction.They advocated an integration of E-learning with other conventionalmodes of instruction such as face-to-face interaction and the use of printbasedmaterials for a more meaningful teaching and learning experience.Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 69
5RECEIVERSThis section reports the results of the study on E-learning readinessamong receivers who are generally students enrolled in higher educationinstitutions or trainees of corporate in-service training courses.5.1 Demographic ProfileA total of 4,625 learners and trainees responded to the questionnaire. Ofthese, 1,804 (39 percent) were males and 2,813 (60.8 percent) were females.The figures in Table 45 show that the number of females who participatedin the study was a third more than the number of males.From the tabulation of data on age group, it can be seen that the majorityof receivers were in the age cohort of 25 and below. This age group madeup 70.7 percent of the total sample. The percentage of respondents tendedto decrease as age increased. Thus, most of the learners and traineesinvolved in the study were young adults and only a few, 177 or 3.8percent, were 41 years and above. The data is presented in Table 45 below.TABLE 45. Number of Receivers According to AgeAgeFrequency(N = 4625)Percentage(%)25 and below 3269 70.726-30 436 9.431-35 447 9.736-40 283 6.141 and above 177 3.8Missing value 13 0.3TOTAL 4625 100.0Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 70
Page 1 and 2:
e-learning readinesse-learningMalay
Page 3 and 4:
E-LEARNING READINESSIN MALAYSIA 200
Page 5 and 6:
E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
application of ICT to pave the way
Page 15 and 16:
University College, lecturers are e
Page 17 and 18:
1. The promotion of information flu
Page 19 and 20:
1.4.1 The ELR InstrumentFour instru
Page 21 and 22:
1.4.3 The RespondentsThe respondent
Page 23 and 24:
(b) Area of Readiness:Content Readi
Page 25 and 26:
2POLICY MAKERS ANDORGANISATIONSThis
Page 27 and 28:
TABLE 2. Demographic Profile of Pol
Page 29 and 30: surveyed (including one policy make
Page 31 and 32: According to the data in Table 8 wh
Page 33 and 34: difference, however, can be observe
Page 35 and 36: Level of Overall Readiness among Po
Page 37 and 38: 2019.616.7Percent1512.813.7106.95.9
Page 39 and 40: 3PROVIDERSThis chapter presents the
Page 41 and 42: adequate for achieving the ideal ba
Page 43 and 44: TABLE 17. Provision of Applications
Page 45 and 46: TABLE 20. Preference for Single poi
Page 47 and 48: expertise to develop content for E-
Page 49 and 50: Finally, it was suggested that step
Page 51 and 52: According to a respondent, one of t
Page 53 and 54: In terms of financial readiness, th
Page 55 and 56: TABLE 28. Level of Overall Readines
Page 57 and 58: 2524.02017.315Percent1012.013.310.7
Page 59 and 60: 201516.4415.0716.4415.07Percent1010
Page 61 and 62: 4ENABLERSThis section presents find
Page 63 and 64: month. This shows that, in general,
Page 65 and 66: As shown in Table 33, the top three
Page 67 and 68: learner-centred and therefore learn
Page 69 and 70: addressed. Further, enablers felt t
Page 71 and 72: Although most enablers acknowledge
Page 73 and 74: greater usage for E-learning. In ad
Page 75 and 76: Level of Overall Readiness among En
Page 77 and 78: 2017.518.51514.913.8FIGURE 17. Over
Page 79: 252020.017.6 17.0Percent1512.612.61
Page 83 and 84: Refer to Table 48 for data on the t
Page 85 and 86: percent). Other uses of the compute
Page 87 and 88: used it for emailing. The use of th
Page 89 and 90: order to be a successful e-learner,
Page 91 and 92: The open-ended responses yielded a
Page 93 and 94: to the Internet as well as, bandwid
Page 95 and 96: TABLE 66. Receivers’ Perceptions
Page 97 and 98: E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
Page 99 and 100: 2524.620Percent1514.515.5 15.9108.5
Page 101 and 102: 2523.72017.7 17.2Percent1513.7108.8
Page 103 and 104: 6SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONSThis ch
Page 105 and 106: TABLE 71. Areas of Readiness among
Page 107 and 108: financial readiness. This may refle
Page 109 and 110: TABLE 72. Summary of Findings (cont
Page 115 and 116: (c) Employ a core team of personnel
Page 117 and 118: (f) Give incentives to companies th
Page 119 and 120: h) Recognise qualifications acquire
Page 121 and 122: AppendixesJoint Study by MEWC and O
Page 123 and 124: ChairpersonChief Secretary, Ministr
Page 125 and 126: OUM Committee on E-learning Readine
Page 127 and 128: Phase I (January - April 2004)Head,
Page 129 and 130: Rohani IsmailManagerTechnology Assi
Page 131 and 132:
Phase III (August - October 2004)He
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix EList of Major Respondents
Page 135 and 136:
33. Universiti Sains Malaysia34. Un
Page 137 and 138:
A Study on E-learning Readiness in
Page 139 and 140:
D. Environmental Readiness Yes No1.
Page 141 and 142:
A Study on E-learning Readiness in
Page 143 and 144:
Instruction: Please respond to the
Page 145 and 146:
Appendix HSurvey Instrument for Ena
Page 147 and 148:
8. Do you use a computer?ٱNever ٱ
Page 149 and 150:
15. My organisation/institution pro
Page 151 and 152:
Appendix ISurvey Instrument for Rec
Page 153 and 154:
4. I am enrolled/attending an in-se
Page 155 and 156:
13. Do you have Internet connection
Page 157 and 158:
15. Content for E-learning is appro
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix JBiodata of the Working Gr
Page 161 and 162:
Currently Fitri is on study leave a
Page 163 and 164:
project. Currently, her focus is to
Page 165 and 166:
Rohani IsmailRohani Ismail has grad
Page 167:
Prior to that, she was a Curriculum
show all

e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?