12.07.2015 Views

Involuntary Displacement and Resettlement — Policy and ... - CEPA

Involuntary Displacement and Resettlement — Policy and ... - CEPA

Involuntary Displacement and Resettlement — Policy and ... - CEPA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 IntroductionWorldwide experience demonstrates that most development projects whichdisplace people create severe economic, social <strong>and</strong> environmental problems.They aggravate poverty by dismantling production systems; relocatingpeople to unfriendly environments where their productive skills may be lessapplicable <strong>and</strong> the competition for resources much greater; weakeningcommunity structures <strong>and</strong> social networks; <strong>and</strong> dispersing kin groups <strong>and</strong>diminishing cultural identity, traditional authority, <strong>and</strong> the potential formutual help. <strong>Involuntary</strong> resettlements usually cause severe long-termhardship, impoverishment, <strong>and</strong> environmental damage unless carefullyplanned <strong>and</strong> executed. It is now widely accepted that people should be atthe centre of any development activity, <strong>and</strong> such activity should aim toenhance the quality of their lives <strong>and</strong> address poverty. During the last fourdecades, thous<strong>and</strong>s of families have been involuntarily resettled in SriLanka, mainly to facilitate irrigation, highway <strong>and</strong> urban developmentprojects, <strong>and</strong> the majority of them have been low income families. Untilrecently, development-induced displacement of population was considered a‘sacrifice’- with a comparatively small group of people displaced for thebenefit of a larger number of people. What these involuntary resettlersreceived as compensation, in general, was limited to statutory monetarycompensation for l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> houses acquired for the project, provided thatlegal ownership could be proved, generally resulting in making poor <strong>and</strong>l<strong>and</strong>less people even poorer <strong>and</strong> more vulnerable.The Project Affected Persons (PAPs) based, pro-poor development-induced<strong>and</strong> participatory <strong>Involuntary</strong> <strong>Resettlement</strong> Program, implemented by theLunawa Environment Improvement & Community Development Project(LEI&CDP), sought to ensure the tenure rights of the poor living in slum <strong>and</strong>shanty settlements in the Lunawa catchments. The project was launched in2002 with the objective of improving the environment <strong>and</strong> quality of life ofpeople by improving the storm water drainage systems in the Lunawa basin.The National <strong>Resettlement</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> (NIRP) was adopted by the government in2001, after the design phase of the LEI&CPD, <strong>and</strong> the scope of the projecthad to be revised, incorporating the NIRP principles, with UN-HABITATtechnical inputs <strong>and</strong> with additional funding by the government.This paper documents the key elements of an innovative implementationprocess of resettlement.148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!