EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboards 2011

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Operating profits growthCompanies showed a remarkable recovery in terms of profits across all regionsand sectors (following the strong losses reported last year). The medium-highR&D-intensive sector presents the best results for most regions, well above therespective region average, e.g. 214.5 % for the EU companies and 627.4% forthe Japanese ones. The high R&D-intensive sector is the second best in termsof operating profits and above the average for Japanese companies. MediumlowR&D-intensive companies showed growth in operating profits well below theaverage in each region.Capital expenditures growthEU companies showed growth of capital expenditures positive and above theEU average in high, medium-high and medium-low R&D intensive sectors and adecrease in low R&D-intensive ones (-1.1%). For US companies capitalexpenditures increased strongly in high (21.5%) and medium-low (18.0%)sectors. Based on the data referring to an earlier period, Japanese companieshad negative capital expenditures growth in all sectors, especially in mediumhigh(-31.7%) and high (-28.7%) sectors. For companies in the OC group,capital expenditures grew significantly in high (59.9%) and medium-high(39.2%) sectors.Figure 7 shows the growth rates over the last 3 years of R&D, net sales andoperating profits by sector groups for the specific EU/US comparison.36The 2011 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard
Figure 7. Annual growth rates of main indicators by R&D intensity for the EU and the UScompaniesEUhigh R&D intensityUSR&Dinvestment2010 growth20092008net salesoperatingprofit-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60%EUmedium-high R&D intensityUSR&Dinvestmentnet sales2010 growth20092008operatingprofit-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60%-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60%EUmedium-low R&D intensityUSR&Dinvestment2010 growth20092008net salesoperatingprofit-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60%-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60%EUlow R&D intensityUSR&Dinvestment2010 growth20092008net salesoperatingprofit-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60%-60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60%Sector groups as in figure S3 of the Summary. For companies with data available for the whole periodSource: The 2011 EU Industrial R&D Investment ScoreboardEuropean Commission, JRC/DG RTD.37The 2011 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard 37
Page 6 and 7: Figure S1. One-year R&D investment,
Page 8: The specialisation of EU companies
Page 11 and 12: A high number of the companies in t
Page 13 and 14: 1. IntroductionThe 2011 "EU Industr
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. Profile of the 2011 Scoreb
Page 17 and 18: 2. OverviewIn the last year compani
Page 19 and 20: Survey on R&D investment by the EU
Page 21 and 22: 3. Top R&D investing companiesThis
Page 23 and 24: R&D changes driven by Mergers and A
Page 25 and 26: Dynamics of top R&D companiesEvery
Page 27 and 28: 4. R&D distribution by regionThis c
Page 29 and 30: Figure 3.R&D investment by the top
Page 31 and 32: R&D Trends of companies in Member S
Page 33 and 34: 5. R&D distribution by industrialse
Page 35 and 36: The actual contribution of an indus
Page 37 and 38: Table 8. Ranking of top 15 industri
Page 39: Those based in the US specialise in
Page 43 and 44: Table 10.Ranking of industrial sect
Page 45 and 46: The profitability of US companies (
Page 47 and 48: Electronic equipment / LeisureThis
Page 49 and 50: Alternative energyAs observed in pr
Page 51 and 52: 6. Fast growing companiesThis chapt
Page 53 and 54: The list of the companies showing t
Page 55 and 56: Table 15. Companies classified as f
Page 57 and 58: Oil equipment, services & distribut
Page 59 and 60: Table 18. Fast growing companies in
Page 61 and 62: Table 20. Fast growing companies in
Page 63 and 64: 7. R&D and employmentThis chapter p
Page 65 and 66: Table 21 shows the ranking of indus
Page 67 and 68: Figure 10. One-year employment grow
Page 69 and 70: Annex 1 - Background informationThe
Page 71 and 72: Annex 2 - Description of the Scoreb
Page 73 and 74: Mergers and acquisitions involving
Page 75 and 76: • Hewlett-Packard, USA acquired 3
Page 77 and 78: Annex 3 - Methodological notesThe 2
Page 79 and 80: The database is supplemented by dat
Page 81 and 82: 1. Funding vs. activityThe focus of
Page 83 and 84: Standard (IAS) 38 “Intangible ass
Page 85 and 86: Annex 4 - List of fast growing comp
Page 87 and 88: Company Country Sector name 4-digit
Page 89 and 90: Annex 5 -EU1000List of EU1000 and n
Page 91 and 92:
R&D Investment2010change10/09Net Sa
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
5.2 Ranking of the top 1000 non-EU
Page 125 and 126:
R&D InvestmentNet SalesR&D/NetSales
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
show all

EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboards 2011

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?