EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboards 2011

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 11. Overall performance of Scoreboard companies in theTelecommunications equipment sector for the EU, the US and othercountries*.Factor EU USAOthercountriesNo. companies 10 34 16Employees 313117 277722 275979R&D Investment, € m 11057.1 11688.2 4690.5Change from previous year, % 4.4 2.2 10.6CAGR 3yr, % -1.7 1.4 4.5Net Sales, € m 84934.2 87333.0 61213.8Change from previous year, % 3.2 10.2 16.6CAGR 3yr, % -3.0 -0.3 9.1R&D intensity, % 13.0 13.4 7.7Capex intensity, % 1.8 3.7 3.0Profitability, % 4.5 17.4 10.0* Includes one Japanese company.Source: The 2011 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard.European Commission, JRC/DG RTD.42The 2011 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard
Electronic equipment / LeisureThis specific analysis includes company data from the Electronic Equipmentsub-sector (part of the Electric & Electronic Equipment sector), the ElectronicOffice Equipment sub-sector (part of the Technology Hardware & Equipmentsector) and the Leisure sector. Table 12 summarises the main indicators of theElectronic Equipment sector for the EU, the US and Japan. Figure 9 shows thetop 20 companies of the Electronic Equipment sector ranked by R&Dinvestment.The top 20 companies account for 77% of the total R&D investment of thesector. The EU, US and Japanese companies together account for 72.5 % ofthe total R&D (Japanese alone account for 53.7% of the total). The top 20 list islargely dominated by Japan with 12 companies, followed by the US with 4companies and the EU, Taiwan and South Korea one company each.The Japanese companies dominate in this sector in number of companies andin average size in terms of employees, R&D investment and net sales. Thereare 37 Japanese companies compared with only 28 from the US and 17 basedin the EU. The average size of Japanese companies in number of employees isdouble than in the US companies and nearly 4 times larger than in the EUsample. In terms of R&D, Japanese companies are in average more than 3times larger than the US and EU companies. Japanese companies are alsolarger in average sales by company, 3 times larger than the US ones andalmost 4 times larger than the EU ones.In terms of R&D investment growth over one and three years, the EUcompanies (1.8% and 3.7%) outperform the Japanese ones (-9.3% and -5.4%)and did better than the US ones (2.5% and -0.2%) over the past 3 years.In terms of sales growth over one and three years, the US companies (14.8%and 0.4%) performed better than the EU ones (11.8% and -0.2%) and theJapanese ones (-5.6% and -5.4%).The R&D intensity of the sector does not change much across regions. Theaverage R&D intensity of the EU companies (6.6%) is higher than theJapanese' (6.3%) and the US' (5.6%).The Japanese companies show much larger Capital expenditure intensity(4.7%) than the US ones (2.2%) and almost twice than the EU ones (2.7%).The profitability of US companies (10.1%) is slightly higher than that of the EUones (9.4%) and 4 times larger than that of the Japanese ones (2.6%).43The 2011 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard 43
Page 6 and 7: Figure S1. One-year R&D investment,
Page 8: The specialisation of EU companies
Page 11 and 12: A high number of the companies in t
Page 13 and 14: 1. IntroductionThe 2011 "EU Industr
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. Profile of the 2011 Scoreb
Page 17 and 18: 2. OverviewIn the last year compani
Page 19 and 20: Survey on R&D investment by the EU
Page 21 and 22: 3. Top R&D investing companiesThis
Page 23 and 24: R&D changes driven by Mergers and A
Page 25 and 26: Dynamics of top R&D companiesEvery
Page 27 and 28: 4. R&D distribution by regionThis c
Page 29 and 30: Figure 3.R&D investment by the top
Page 31 and 32: R&D Trends of companies in Member S
Page 33 and 34: 5. R&D distribution by industrialse
Page 35 and 36: The actual contribution of an indus
Page 37 and 38: Table 8. Ranking of top 15 industri
Page 39 and 40: Those based in the US specialise in
Page 41 and 42: Figure 7. Annual growth rates of ma
Page 43 and 44: Table 10.Ranking of industrial sect
Page 45: The profitability of US companies (
Page 49 and 50: Alternative energyAs observed in pr
Page 51 and 52: 6. Fast growing companiesThis chapt
Page 53 and 54: The list of the companies showing t
Page 55 and 56: Table 15. Companies classified as f
Page 57 and 58: Oil equipment, services & distribut
Page 59 and 60: Table 18. Fast growing companies in
Page 61 and 62: Table 20. Fast growing companies in
Page 63 and 64: 7. R&D and employmentThis chapter p
Page 65 and 66: Table 21 shows the ranking of indus
Page 67 and 68: Figure 10. One-year employment grow
Page 69 and 70: Annex 1 - Background informationThe
Page 71 and 72: Annex 2 - Description of the Scoreb
Page 73 and 74: Mergers and acquisitions involving
Page 75 and 76: • Hewlett-Packard, USA acquired 3
Page 77 and 78: Annex 3 - Methodological notesThe 2
Page 79 and 80: The database is supplemented by dat
Page 81 and 82: 1. Funding vs. activityThe focus of
Page 83 and 84: Standard (IAS) 38 “Intangible ass
Page 85 and 86: Annex 4 - List of fast growing comp
Page 87 and 88: Company Country Sector name 4-digit
Page 89 and 90: Annex 5 -EU1000List of EU1000 and n
Page 91 and 92: R&D Investment2010change10/09Net Sa
Page 97 and 98:
R&D Investment2010change10/09Net Sa
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
5.2 Ranking of the top 1000 non-EU
Page 125 and 126:
R&D InvestmentNet SalesR&D/NetSales
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
show all

EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboards 2011

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?