12.07.2015 Views

EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboards 2011

EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboards 2011

EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboards 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The database is supplemented by data feeds from third party commercial databasehouses such as Standard & Poor's and Jordan's. Other sources such as FTSEInternational, Bureau van Dijk's Orbis and Fame databases, Experian, Hemscott andThomson Reuters have also been used..The database contains many times more companies than are listed in the Scoreboardto ensure that the top companies by R&D investment can be identified in each case.The industry sectors are based on the ICB Industry Classification System.LimitationsThe approach used in preparing the Scoreboard has the following limitations:1. DisclosureThe Scoreboard relies on disclosure of R&D investment in published annual reportsand accounts. Therefore, companies which do not disclose figures for R&D investmentor which disclose only figures which are not material enough are not included in theScoreboard. There are few companies which disclose a significant R&D investmentonly as a percentage figure (often to only one significant figure), e.g. VINCI, France.These companies are not included in the Scoreboard.Due to different national accounting standards and disclosure practice, companies ofsome countries are less likely than others to disclose R&D investment consistently.Further, the facilities and possibility to acquire accounts differ considerably fromcountry to country because the organisation of document registration varies betweenlocal and central registries as well as the information that can be obtained and the costto acquire this data.In some countries, R&D costs are very often integrated with other operational costsand can therefore not be identified separately. For example, companies from manySouthern European countries or the new Member States are under-represented in theScoreboard. On the other side, UK companies are over-represented in the Scoreboard.For listed companies, country representation will improve with IFRS adoption.For many highly diversified companies, the R&D investment disclosed in their accountsrelates only part of their activities, whereas sales, profit before tax and marketcapitalisation are in respect of all their activities. Unless such groups disclose theirR&D investment additional to the other information in segmental analyses, it is notpossible to relate the R&D more closely to the results of the individual activities whichgive rise to it. The impact of this is that some statistics for these groups, e.g. R&D as apercentage of sales, are possibly underestimated and so comparisons with nondiversifiedgroups are limited.The R&D investment disclosed in some companies' accounts follows the US practice ofincluding engineering costs relating to product improvement, e.g. Ingersoll-Rand,Ireland. Where these engineering costs have been disclosed separately, they havebeen excluded from the Scoreboard. However, the incidence of non-disclosure isuncertain and the impact of this practice is a possible overstatement of some overseas75The <strong>2011</strong> <strong>EU</strong> <strong>Industrial</strong> R&D <strong>Investment</strong> Scoreboard 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!