sericea, Photinia pyrifolia (= Aronia arbutifolia), Photinia melanocarpa (= Aronia melanocarpa), Rhododendron maximum,Rhododendron viscosum, Kalmia latifolia, Kalmia carolina, Hypericum densiflorum, Lyonia ligustrina, Ilex verticillata, Spiraeatomentosa, Spiraea alba, and Menziesia pilosa. The herb layer may include Carex leptalea, Carex folliculata, Carex gynandra, Carexatlantica, Rhynchospora capitellata, Scirpus expansus, Scirpus cyperinus, Scirpus atrovirens, Osmunda cinnamomea, Osmundaregalis var. spectabilis, Solidago patula var. patula, Packera aurea (= Senecio aureus), Thelypteris palustris var. pubescens, Juncuseffusus, Juncus subcaudatus, Lysimachia terrestris, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Eriophorum virginicum, Oxypolis rigidior, Sagittarialatifolia (= var. pubescens), and Orontium aquaticum. Sphagnum species include Sphagnum palustre, Sphagnum affine, Sphagnumbartlettianum, and Sphagnum recurvum. Other important bryophytes include Polytrichum commune, Rhizomnium appalachianum,and Aulacomnium palustre.Dynamics: Some occurrences of this community may have formed as the result of logging or catastrophic fire, followed by beaveractivity. Reduction of Sphagnum cover, due to siltation, trampling, or nutrient input, promotes succession by woody species. Little isknown about the successional dynamics of mountain wetlands. It is thought that beaver may have been responsible for maintaining ashifting mosaic of boggy habitats which included this community (Weakley and Schafale 1994). With the extirpation of beaver in theNorth Carolina mountains, vegetative succession proceeds in these habitats and will eventually result in a forested community.Similar Associations:Related Concepts:• IIE1b. Southern Appalachian Bog Complex (Allard 1990) B• Mountain Bog/Seep Herbaceous Vegetation (Ambrose 1990a) B• Mountain Bog/Seep Shrub/Scrub Vegetation (Ambrose 1990a) B• Southern Appalachian Bog (Low Elevation Shrub Subtype) (Schafale 1998b) ?• Southern Appalachian Bog, Low Elevation Variant (Weakley and Schafale 1994) ?• Southern Appalachian Bog, Southern Floodplain Variant (Weakley and Schafale 1994) ?Classification Comments: The nominals are used to distinguish this type from high-elevation bogs; Juncus gymnocarpus is not inall occurrences and perhaps another nominal should be found. Carex stricta-dominated wetlands may occur adjacent to thiscommunity. Similar wetland communities occur in the southern and central Appalachian Mountains. This community typically occursat lower elevations, is associated with floodplains, and lacks species characteristic of higher elevations, such as Houstoniaserpyllifolia, Picea rubens, Betula alleghaniensis, and Carex trisperma.CONSERVATION RANKING & RARE SPECIESGRank: G1G2 (1998-4-30): This community occurs at moderate elevations (750-950 meters; 2400-3200 feet), in the northern partof the Southern Blue Ridge, primarily in Allegheny and Ashe counties, North Carolina, and probably in adjacent Virginia. It alsooccurs south of the Asheville Basin in southwestern North Carolina and probably adjacent South Carolina and Georgia. Few examplesremain, and many of these are in degraded condition. Threats include grazing, agricultural inputs, aerial deposition of air pollutants,and watershed alteration, including road building and development, all which can alter the natural hydrologic regime.High-ranked species: Carex schweinitzii (G3G4), Chelone cuthbertii (G3), Helenium brevifolium (G3G4), Helonias bullata (G3),Lilium grayi (G3), Poa paludigena (G3)ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONRange: This community is known from the northern part of the Southern Blue Ridge, primarily in Allegheny and Ashe counties,North Carolina, in Monroe County, Tennessee, and probably in adjacent Virginia. It also occurs south of the Asheville Basin insouthwestern North Carolina and probably in adjacent South Carolina and Georgia.Subnations: GA, NC, SC, TN, VA?TNC Ecoregions: 51:C, 59:CUSFS Ecoregions: M221Db:CCC, M221Dc:CCC, M221Dd:CCCFederal Lands: NPS (Blue Ridge Parkway); USFS (Chattahoochee, Cherokee, Nantahala, Pisgah?, <strong>Sumter</strong>?)ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1990, Ambrose 1990a, <strong>NatureServe</strong> Ecology - Southeastern U.S. unpubl. data, Peet et al. unpubl. data 2002,Schafale 1998b, Schafale and Weakley 1990, Southeastern Ecology Working Group n.d., Weakley 1993, Weakley and Schafale 1994Vegetation of <strong>Sumter</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> April 30 2004Copyright © 2004 <strong>NatureServe</strong>102
BIBLIOGRAPHYALNHP [Alabama Natural Heritage Program]. 2002. Eufaula <strong>National</strong> Wildlife Refuge: Natural community and rare plant survey.Alabama Natural Heritage Program, The Nature Conservancy, Montgomery.Abrams, M. D. 1992. Fire and the development of oak forests. BioScience 42(5):346-353.Adams, Bill. Personal communication. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States ecological community classification. Interim report, Version 1.2. The NatureConservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC. 96 pp.Allred, B. W., and H. C. Mitchell. 1955. Major plant types of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas and their relation to climateand soils. Texas Journal of Science 7:7-19.Ambrose, J. 1990a. Georgia's natural communities--A preliminary list. Unpublished document. Georgia Natural Heritage Inventory. 5pp.Anderson, D. M. 1982. Plant communities of Ohio: A preliminary classification and description. Division of Natural Areas andPreserves, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, OH. 182 pp.Anderson, D. M. 1996. The vegetation of Ohio: Two centuries of change. Draft. Ohio Biological Survey.Anderson, L. E., H. A. Crum, and W. R. Buck. 1990. List of mosses of North America north of Mexico. The Bryologist 93:448-499.Andreu, M. G., and M. L. Tukman. 1995. <strong>Forest</strong> communities of the Tellico Lake Area, East Tennessee. M.F. project report, DukeUniversity, School of the Environment. Durham, NC. 66 pp. plus appendices.Andreu, M. G., and M. L. Tukman. 1995. <strong>Forest</strong> communities of the Tellico Lake Area, East Tennessee. M.F. project report. DukeUniversity, School of the Environment. Durham, NC. 66 pp. plus appendices.Arends, E. 1981. Vegetation patterns a half century following the chestnut blight in the Great Smoky Mountains <strong>National</strong> Park. M.S.thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 79 pp.Baker, J. B., and O. G. Langdon. 1990. Pinus taeda L. Loblolly pine. Pages 497-512 in: R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala, technicalcoordinators. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Service. Agriculture Handbook 654. Washington,DC.Barden, L. S. 1977. Self-maintaining populations of Pinus pungens Lam. in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Castanea 42:316-323.Barden, L. S., and F. W. Woods. 1976. Effects of fire on pine and pine-hardwood forests in the southern Appalachians. <strong>Forest</strong>Science 22:399-403.Barnes, B. V. 1991. Deciduous forests of North America. Chapter 10 in: E. Rohrig and B. Ulrich, editors. Ecosystems of the World 7:Temperate deciduous forests. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York.Boufford, D. E., and E. W. Wood. 1977. An unusual plant community in South Carolina. Castanea 42:116-119.Braun, E. L. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Hafner Press, New York. 596 pp.Breden, T. F., Y. R. Alger, K. S. Walz, and A. G. Windisch. 2001. Classification of vegetation communities of New Jersey: Seconditeration. Association for Biodiversity Information and New Jersey Natural Heritage Program, Office of Natural LandsManagaement, Division of Parks and <strong>Forest</strong>ry, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Trenton, NJ.Brender, E. V. 1974. Impact of past land use on the lower Piedmont forest. Journal of <strong>Forest</strong>ry 72:34-36.Bromley, S. W. 1935. The original forest types of southern New England. Ecological Monographs 5:61-89.Brown, J. D., W. H. Elder, and K. E. Evans. 1982b. Winter foraging by cavity nesting birds in an oak-hickory forest. Wildlife SocietyBulletin 10:271-275.Bruner, W. E. 1931. The vegetation of Oklahoma. Ecological Monographs 1:99-188.Buck, P. 1964. Relationships of the woody vegetation of the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge to geological formations and soiltypes. Ecology 45:336-344.Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. USDA <strong>Forest</strong>Service. Agriculture Handbook 654. Washington, DC. 675 pp.Vegetation of <strong>Sumter</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> April 30 2004Copyright © 2004 <strong>NatureServe</strong>103
- Page 3:
1 NatureServe is an international o
- Page 11 and 12:
types. However, when necessary, mod
- Page 13 and 14:
[Association name = floristic nomin
- Page 15 and 16:
Generally 5 or fewer occurrences an
- Page 17 and 18:
All scientific names for vascular s
- Page 19 and 20:
Summary: A short description of the
- Page 21 and 22:
Loucks, O. 1996. 100 years after Co
- Page 23 and 24:
ALLIANCES BY US NATIONAL VEGETATION
- Page 25 and 26:
virginiana, and Acer pensylvanicum
- Page 27 and 28:
virginiana, Juniperus virginiana va
- Page 29 and 30:
• Appalachian pine-oak forest (Ev
- Page 31 and 32:
• Maritime Oak - Holly Forest / W
- Page 33 and 34:
ALLIANCE CONCEPTSummary: This allia
- Page 35 and 36:
Related Concepts:• Yellow-Poplar:
- Page 37 and 38:
virginiana, Sanicula canadensis, De
- Page 39 and 40:
Federal Lands: COE (Claiborne Lake)
- Page 41 and 42:
ALLIANCE SOURCESReferences: Allard
- Page 43 and 44:
Quercus alba and Quercus velutina a
- Page 45 and 46:
USFS Ecoregions: 221Hc:CCC, 221He:C
- Page 47 and 48:
ALLIANCE CONCEPTSummary: This allia
- Page 49 and 50:
USFS Ecoregions: 221Eb:PP?, M221Ab:
- Page 51 and 52:
Federal Lands: NPS (Great Smoky Mou
- Page 53 and 54:
the associated species. More Appala
- Page 55 and 56:
ALLIANCE DISTRIBUTIONRange: This al
- Page 57 and 58:
USFS Ecoregions: 221Ha:CCC, 221Hc:C
- Page 59 and 60:
elevation environments such as Leio
- Page 61 and 62:
CULTIVATED FORESTEASTERN WHITE PINE
- Page 63 and 64:
Federal Lands: DOD (Arnold, Fort Be
- Page 65 and 66:
does not occur on wet soils. It occ
- Page 67 and 68:
Liriodendron tulipifera, although o
- Page 69 and 70:
ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 71 and 72:
ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 73 and 74: Similar Associations:• Pinus echi
- Page 75 and 76: • Pinus echinata - Quercus stella
- Page 77 and 78: this association occurs in edaphica
- Page 79 and 80: Vegetation: This forest typically h
- Page 81 and 82: strobus can have high coverage and
- Page 83 and 84: CONSERVATION RANKING & RARE SPECIES
- Page 85 and 86: • Quercus alba - Carya alba / Euo
- Page 87 and 88: muehlenbergii. In addition, Acer ba
- Page 89 and 90: WHITE OAK - MOCKERNUT HICKORY / AME
- Page 91 and 92: CONSERVATION RANKING & RARE SPECIES
- Page 93 and 94: Vegetation: This association encomp
- Page 95 and 96: ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONRange: This com
- Page 97 and 98: • Quercus prinus - Carya spp. - Q
- Page 99 and 100: catesbaei, Desmodium nudiflorum, Eu
- Page 101 and 102: ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 103 and 104: High-ranked species: No information
- Page 105 and 106: Dynamics: No informationSimilar Ass
- Page 107 and 108: protrusa, Grammitis nimbata (= Micr
- Page 109 and 110: ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONRange: This for
- Page 111 and 112: COMMON WATER-WILLOW HERBACEOUS VEGE
- Page 113 and 114: • Betula nigra - Platanus occiden
- Page 115 and 116: Formation: Temporarily flooded temp
- Page 117 and 118: epeated flooding, this community ma
- Page 119 and 120: USFS Ecoregions: 221Ba:CCC, 221Ha:C
- Page 121 and 122: Classification Comments: On the Ban
- Page 123: Classification Comments: This veget
- Page 127 and 128: DeYoung, H. R. 1979. The white pine
- Page 129 and 130: Gettman, R. W. 1974. A floristic su
- Page 131 and 132: Lea, C. 2002a. Vegetation classific
- Page 133 and 134: Pittman, Dr. Albert. Personal commu
- Page 135 and 136: Tobe, J. D., J. E. Fairey, III, and