Fleming, G. P., and P. P. Coulling. 2001. Ecological communities of the George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia.Preliminary classification and description of vegetation types. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division ofNatural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 317 pp.Fleming, G. P., and W. H. Moorhead, III. 1996. Ecological land units of the Laurel Fork Area, Highland County, Virginia. VirginiaDepartment of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Natural Heritage Technical <strong>Report</strong> 96-08. Richmond.114 pp. plus appendices.Fleming, G. P., and W. H. Moorhead, III. 2000. Plant communities and ecological land units of the Peter's Mountain area, JamesRiver Ranger District, George Washington and Jefferson national forests, Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical <strong>Report</strong> 00-07.Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond. Unpublished report submitted tothe USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Service. 195 pp. plus appendices.Fleming, Gary P. Personal communication. Ecologist, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of NaturalHeritage, Richmond, VA.Flinchum, D. M. 1977. Lesser vegetation as indicators of varying moisture regimes in bottomland and swamp forests of northeasternNorth Carolina. Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh. 105 pp.Foti, T. 1994a. Natural communities of Arkansas (terrestrial and palustrine). Unpublished document. Arkansas Natural HeritageCommission, Little Rock. 2 pp.Foti, T., M. Blaney, X. Li, and K. G. Smith. 1994. A classification system for the natural vegetation of Arkansas. Proceedings of theArkansas Academy of Science 48:50-53.Foti, T., and J. M. Guldin. 1994. Multivariate analysis of the ground cover layer, shrub layer, midstory and overstory of theOuachita/Ozark national forests. Pages 61-73 in: J. B. Baker, compiler. Proceedings of the Symposium on EcosystemManagement Research in the Ouachita Mountains: Pretreatment conditions and preliminary findings. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Service.General Technical <strong>Report</strong> SO-112.Foti, T., compiler. 1994b. Natural vegetation classification system of Arkansas, draft five. Unpublished document. Arkansas NaturalHeritage Commission, Little Rock. 8 pp.Fountain, M. S., and J. M. Sweeney. 1985. Ecological assessment of the Roaring Branch Research Natural Area. USDA <strong>Forest</strong>Service, Southern <strong>Forest</strong> Experiment Station. Research Paper SO-213. New Orleans, LA. 15 pp.Fountain, M. S., and J. M. Sweeney. 1987. Ecological assessment of the Lake Winona Research Natural Area. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Service,Southern <strong>Forest</strong> Experiment Station. Research Paper SO-235. New Orleans. 14 pp.Fowells, H. A, compiler. 1965. Silvics of the forest trees of the United States. Agriculture Handbook No. 271. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Service,Washington, DC. 762 pp.Fralish, J. S. 1988b. Predicting potential stand composition from site characteristics in the Shawnee Hills <strong>Forest</strong> of Illinois. TheAmerican Midland Naturalist 120(1):79-101.Fralish, J. S., F. B. Crooks, J. L. Chambers, and F. M. Harty. 1991. Comparison of presettlement, second-growth and old-growthforest on six site types in the Illinois Shawnee Hills. The American Midland Naturalist 125:294-309.Frelich, L. E., and C. G. Lorimer. 1991a. Natural disturbance regimes in hemlock-hardwood forests of the upper Great Lakes region.Ecological Monographs 61(2):145-164.Frost, C. C. 1998. Presettlement fire frequency regimes of the United States: A first approximation. Pages 70-81 in: T. L. Pruden andL. A. Brennan, editors. Fire in ecosystem management: Shifting the paradigm from suppression to prescription. Tall TimbersFire Ecology Conference Proceedings, No. 20. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL.Frothingham, E. H., J. S. Holmes, W. J. Damtoft, E. F. McCarthy, and C. F. Korstian. 1926. A forest type classification for thesouthern Appalachian Mountains and adjacent plateau and coastal region. Journal of <strong>Forest</strong>ry 24:673-684.Gallyoun, M., G. Meyer, A. Andreu, and W. Slocumb. 1996. Mapping vegetation communities with The Nature Conservancy'svegetation classification system on five small national parks in the southeastern USA. Unpublished report. The NatureConservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Conservation Science Department, Chapel Hill, NC.Gant, R. E. 1978. The role of allelopathic interference in the maintenance of southern Appalachian heath balds. Ph.D. dissertation,University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 123 pp.Gattis, J. T. 1992. Landscape ecosystem classification on the Highlands Ranger District, Nantahala <strong>National</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> in North Carolina.M.S. thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC. 55 pp.Vegetation of <strong>Sumter</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> April 30 2004Copyright © 2004 <strong>NatureServe</strong>106
Gettman, R. W. 1974. A floristic survey of <strong>Sumter</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>--The Andrew Pickens Division. M.S. thesis, Clemson University,Clemson, SC. 131 pp.Gibbon, E. L. 1966. The vegetation of three monadnocks in the eastern Piedmont of North Carolina. M.S. thesis, North Carolina StateUniversity, Raleigh. 98 pp.Golden, M. S. 1974. <strong>Forest</strong> vegetation and site relationships in the central portion of the Great Smoky Mountains <strong>National</strong> Park. Ph.D.dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 275 pp.Golden, M. S. 1979. <strong>Forest</strong> vegetation of the lower Alabama Piedmont. Ecology 60:770-782.Golden, M. S. 1981. An integrated multivariate analysis of forest communities of the central Great Smoky Mountains. The AmericanMidland Naturalist 106:37-53.Gordon, R. B. 1937b. A botanical survey of the southwestern section of the Allegheny State Park. New York State MuseumHandbook 17:199-247. State University of New York, Albany.Govus, T. E. 1982. Vegetative profiles of the major forest types in the Pisgah and Nantahala national forests. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Service.Contract No. 00-4550-1-1399. 71 pp.Greenlee, K. W. 1974. A vegetation analysis of a pristine and a selectively cut cove forest of the Unicoi Mountains, western NorthCarolina. M.S. thesis, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC. 36 pp.Greller, A. M. 1989. Correlation of warmth and temperateness with the distributional limits of zonal forests in eastern North America.Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 116:145-163.Guyette, R. P., and B. E. Cutter. 1991. Tree-ring analysis of fire history of a post oak savanna in the Missouri Ozarks. Natural AreasJournal 11:93-99.Halls, L. K., and W. B. Homesley. 1966. Stand composition in a mature pine-hardwood forest of southeastern Texas. Journal of<strong>Forest</strong>ry 64:170-174.Hansen, P. L., R. D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B. J. Cook, J. Joy, and D. K. Hinckley. 1995. Classification and management of Montana'sriparian and wetland sites. Montana <strong>Forest</strong> and Conservation Experiment Station, School of <strong>Forest</strong>ry, University of Montana,Miscellaneous Publication No. 54. 646 pp. + posters.Hansen, P. L., S. W. Chadde, and R. D. Pfister. 1988b. Riparian dominance types of Montana. University of Montana MiscellaneousPublication 49. Montana <strong>Forest</strong> and Conservation Experiment Station, Missoula. 411 pp.Hansen, P., K. Boggs, and R. Pfister. 1991. Classification and management of riparian and wetland sites in Montana. Unpublisheddraft version prepared for Montana Riparian Association, Montana <strong>Forest</strong> and Conservation Experiment Station, School of<strong>Forest</strong>ry, University of Montana, Missoula. 478 pp.Harrod, J. C., and R. D. White. 1999. Age structure and radial growth in xeric pine-oak forests in western Great Smoky Mountains<strong>National</strong> Park. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 126(2):139-146.Hedlin, A. F., H. O. Yates, III, D. C. Tover, B. H. Ebel, T. W. Koerber, and E. P. Merkel. 1981. Cone and seed insects of NorthAmerican conifers. USDA <strong>Forest</strong> Service. Cooperative Publication. Washington, DC.Hines, Martina. Personal communication. Ecologist, Kentucky Natural Heritage Program, Kentucky State Nature PreservesCommission, Frankfort.Hinkle, C. R. 1978. The segregation of forest communities and selected species to edaphic and topographic factors in the CumberlandPlateau of Tennessee. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 262 pp.Hinkle, C. R. 1989. <strong>Forest</strong> communities of the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science64:123-129.Hoagland, B. 2000. The vegetation of Oklahoma: A classification for landscape mapping and conservation planning. TheSouthwestern Naturalist 45(4):385-420.Hoagland, B. W. 1997. Preliminary plant community classification for Oklahoma. Unpublished draft document, version 35629.University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory, Norman. 47 pp.Hoagland, B. W. 1998a. Classification of Oklahoma vegetation types. Working draft. University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma NaturalHeritage Inventory, Norman. 43 pp.Hodgdon, A. R., and R. Pike. 1961. An ecological interpretation of Rhododendron colonies in Maine and New Hampshire. Rhodora63:61-70.Vegetation of <strong>Sumter</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> April 30 2004Copyright © 2004 <strong>NatureServe</strong>107
- Page 3:
1 NatureServe is an international o
- Page 11 and 12:
types. However, when necessary, mod
- Page 13 and 14:
[Association name = floristic nomin
- Page 15 and 16:
Generally 5 or fewer occurrences an
- Page 17 and 18:
All scientific names for vascular s
- Page 19 and 20:
Summary: A short description of the
- Page 21 and 22:
Loucks, O. 1996. 100 years after Co
- Page 23 and 24:
ALLIANCES BY US NATIONAL VEGETATION
- Page 25 and 26:
virginiana, and Acer pensylvanicum
- Page 27 and 28:
virginiana, Juniperus virginiana va
- Page 29 and 30:
• Appalachian pine-oak forest (Ev
- Page 31 and 32:
• Maritime Oak - Holly Forest / W
- Page 33 and 34:
ALLIANCE CONCEPTSummary: This allia
- Page 35 and 36:
Related Concepts:• Yellow-Poplar:
- Page 37 and 38:
virginiana, Sanicula canadensis, De
- Page 39 and 40:
Federal Lands: COE (Claiborne Lake)
- Page 41 and 42:
ALLIANCE SOURCESReferences: Allard
- Page 43 and 44:
Quercus alba and Quercus velutina a
- Page 45 and 46:
USFS Ecoregions: 221Hc:CCC, 221He:C
- Page 47 and 48:
ALLIANCE CONCEPTSummary: This allia
- Page 49 and 50:
USFS Ecoregions: 221Eb:PP?, M221Ab:
- Page 51 and 52:
Federal Lands: NPS (Great Smoky Mou
- Page 53 and 54:
the associated species. More Appala
- Page 55 and 56:
ALLIANCE DISTRIBUTIONRange: This al
- Page 57 and 58:
USFS Ecoregions: 221Ha:CCC, 221Hc:C
- Page 59 and 60:
elevation environments such as Leio
- Page 61 and 62:
CULTIVATED FORESTEASTERN WHITE PINE
- Page 63 and 64:
Federal Lands: DOD (Arnold, Fort Be
- Page 65 and 66:
does not occur on wet soils. It occ
- Page 67 and 68:
Liriodendron tulipifera, although o
- Page 69 and 70:
ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 71 and 72:
ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 73 and 74:
Similar Associations:• Pinus echi
- Page 75 and 76:
• Pinus echinata - Quercus stella
- Page 77 and 78: this association occurs in edaphica
- Page 79 and 80: Vegetation: This forest typically h
- Page 81 and 82: strobus can have high coverage and
- Page 83 and 84: CONSERVATION RANKING & RARE SPECIES
- Page 85 and 86: • Quercus alba - Carya alba / Euo
- Page 87 and 88: muehlenbergii. In addition, Acer ba
- Page 89 and 90: WHITE OAK - MOCKERNUT HICKORY / AME
- Page 91 and 92: CONSERVATION RANKING & RARE SPECIES
- Page 93 and 94: Vegetation: This association encomp
- Page 95 and 96: ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONRange: This com
- Page 97 and 98: • Quercus prinus - Carya spp. - Q
- Page 99 and 100: catesbaei, Desmodium nudiflorum, Eu
- Page 101 and 102: ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 103 and 104: High-ranked species: No information
- Page 105 and 106: Dynamics: No informationSimilar Ass
- Page 107 and 108: protrusa, Grammitis nimbata (= Micr
- Page 109 and 110: ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONRange: This for
- Page 111 and 112: COMMON WATER-WILLOW HERBACEOUS VEGE
- Page 113 and 114: • Betula nigra - Platanus occiden
- Page 115 and 116: Formation: Temporarily flooded temp
- Page 117 and 118: epeated flooding, this community ma
- Page 119 and 120: USFS Ecoregions: 221Ba:CCC, 221Ha:C
- Page 121 and 122: Classification Comments: On the Ban
- Page 123 and 124: Classification Comments: This veget
- Page 125 and 126: BIBLIOGRAPHYALNHP [Alabama Natural
- Page 127: DeYoung, H. R. 1979. The white pine
- Page 131 and 132: Lea, C. 2002a. Vegetation classific
- Page 133 and 134: Pittman, Dr. Albert. Personal commu
- Page 135 and 136: Tobe, J. D., J. E. Fairey, III, and