Anderson, M., P. Bourgeron, M. T. Bryer, R. Crawford, L. Engelking, D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Gallyoun, K. Goodin, D. H.Grossman, S. Landaal, K. Metzler, K. D. Patterson, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, and A. S. Weakley. 1998. Internationalclassification of ecological communities: terrestrial vegetation of the United States. Volume II. The <strong>National</strong> VegetationClassification System: list of types. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA.Beard, J. S. 1973. The physiognomic approach. Pp. 355-386 in R. H. Whittaker (ed.). Ordination and classification of communities.Handbook of Vegetation Science, Part 5. Dr. W. Junk b.v. Publishers, The Hague.Braun-Blanquet, J. 1965. Plant sociology: the study of plant communities. (English translation of 2nd ed.) (Trans. rev. and ed. byC.D. Fuller and H.S. Conard) Hafner, London. 439 p.Cook, J. E. 1995. Implications of modern successional theory for habitat typing: a review. <strong>Forest</strong> Science 42:67-75.Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the UnitedStates. Biol. Serv. Progr., U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Washington, DC, Publication No. FWS/OBS-79/31. 103 pp.Daubenmire, R. 1952. <strong>Forest</strong> vegetation of northern Idaho and adjacent Washington, and its bearing on concepts of vegetationclassification. Ecological Monographs 22:301-330.Dick-Peddie, W. A. 1993. New Mexico Vegetation: past, present and future. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. 244pp.Driscoll, R. S., D. L. Merkel, R. L. Radloff, D. E. Snyder, and J. S. Hagihara. 1984. An ecological land classification framework forthe United States. United States Department of Agriculture, <strong>Forest</strong> Service Miscellaneous Publication Number 1439.Washington, DC. 56 pp.Ellenberg, H. 1963. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit dem Alpen. Eugene Ulmer, Stuttgart. 943 P. 2nd.ed, 1974.Eyre, F. H. 1980. <strong>Forest</strong> cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American <strong>Forest</strong>ers, Washington D.C. 148 p.FGDC. 1997. <strong>National</strong> Vegetation Classification Standard. FGDC-STD-005. Federal Geographic Data Committee, VegetationSubcommittee, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. Web address: http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/status/sub2_1.html(accessed April 30, 2004)Greenall, J. 1996. Manitoba's terrestrial plant communities. Manitoba Conservation Data Centre MS <strong>Report</strong> 96-02. Winnipeg,Manitoba, Canada. 32 pp.Grossman, D. H., D. Faber-Langendoen, A. W. Weakley, M. Anderson, P. Bourgeron, R. Crawford, K. Goodin, S. Landaal, K.Metzler, K. D. Patterson, M. Pyne, M. Reid, and L. Sneddon. 1998. International classification of ecological communities:terrestrial vegetation of the United States. Volume I. The <strong>National</strong> Vegetation Classification System: development, status, andapplications. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA.Grossman, D. H., K. L. Goodin, and C. L. Reuss (editors). 1994. Rare plant communities of the conterminous United States: aninitial survey. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. 620 pp.Hunter, M. 1991. Coping with ignorance: the coarse-filter strategy for maintaining biodiversity. Pages 256-281 in K.A. Kohm, ed.,Balancing on the Brink of Extinction-the Endangered Species Act and Lessons for the Future. Island Press, Washington, DC.Jenkins, R. E. 1976. Maintenance of natural diversity: approach and recommendations. Pages 441-451 in Transactions of the 41st NorthAmerican Wildlife Conference, 4 March 1976, Washington, DC. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC.Jennings, M. 1993. Natural terrestrial cover classification; assumptions and definitions. Gap Analysis Technical Bulletin 2. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service, Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.Kartesz, J. T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada,and Greenland. First edition. In: J. T. Kartesz and C. A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. NorthCarolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, NC.Keys, Jr., J. C. Carpenter, S. Hooks, F. Koenig, W.H. McNab, W.E. Russell, and M.L. Smith. 1995. Ecological units of the eastern UnitedStates - first approximation (map and booklet of map unit tables). Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. Department of Agriculture, <strong>Forest</strong> Service,presentation scale 1:3,500,000, colored.Lammert, M., J. Higgins, D. Grossman, and M. Bryer. 1997. A classification framework for freshwater communities: Proceedingsof The Nature Conservancy's Aquatic Community Classification Workshop, April 9-11, 1996, New Haven, Missouri.Leach, M. and L. Ross. 1995. Midwest oak ecosystems recovery plan: a call to action. The Nature Conservancy, Illinois Field Office,Chicago, IL.Vegetation of <strong>Sumter</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> April 30 2004Copyright © 2004 <strong>NatureServe</strong>xvii
Loucks, O. 1996. 100 years after Cowles: a national classification for vegetation. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America77:75-76.Master, L.L. 1991. Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conservation Biology 5:559-563.Maybury, Kathleen P., editor. 1999. Seeing the <strong>Forest</strong> and the Trees: Ecological Classification for Conservation. The Nature Conservancy,Arlington, Virginia.Moravec, J. 1993. Syntaxonomic and nomenclatural treatment of Scandinavian-type associations and sociations. Journal ofVegetation Science 4:833-838.Ostlie, W.R., R. S. Schneider, J.M. Aldrich, R.L.B. McKim, T. Faust, and H. Watson. 1996. The status of biodiversity in the GreatPlains. The Nature Conservancy, Great Plains Program, Minneapolis, MN.Pfister, R. D., and S. F. Arno. 1980. Classifying forest habitat types based on potential climax vegetation. <strong>Forest</strong> Science 26:52-70.Rubel, E. 1930. Pflanzengesellschaften der erde. Bern-Berlin.Schrader-Frechette, K. S. and E. D. McCoy. 1993. Methods in ecology: strategies for conservation. Cambridge University Press,NY. 328 p.Specht, R., E. M. Roe, and V. H. Boughton. 1974. Conservation of major plant communities in Australia and Papua New Guinea.Australian Journal of Botany, Supplement 7. 667 pp.Strong, W. L., E. T. Oswald, and D. J. Downing. 1990. The Canadian vegetation classification system, first approximation.<strong>National</strong> Vegetation Working Group, Canadian Committee on Ecological Land Classification. Ecological Land ClassificationSeries, No. 25, Sustainable Development, Corporate Policy Group, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada.The Nature Conservancy Great Lakes Program. 1994. The conservation of biological diversity in the Great Lakes ecosystem: issues andopportunities.The Nature Conservancy 1995. Descriptions of 31 Rare/Special Ecological Groups in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. <strong>Report</strong>submitted to the U.S. <strong>Forest</strong> Service for the Southern Appalachian Assessment. Prepared by the Nature Conservancy, SouthernScience Dept., Community Ecology Group. Sept. 1995.UNESCO. 1973. International Classification and Mapping of Vegetation, Series 6 Ecology and Conservation. United NationsEducation, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Paris. 93 pp.van der Maarel, E. and F. Klotzli. 1996. Community ecology and conservation biology: Introduction. Journal of Vegetation Science7:6.Vankat, J. L. 1990. A classification of the forest types of North America. Vegetatio 88: 53-66.Webb, L. J., J. G. Tracey, W. T. Williams, and G. N. Lance. 1970. Studies in the numerical analysis of complex rainforestcommunities. V. A comparison of the properties of floristic and physiognomic-structural data. Journal of Ecology 58:203-232.Werger, M. J. A., and J. T. C. Sprangers. 1982. Comparison of floristic and structural classification of vegetation. Vegetatio 50:175-183.Westhoff, V. 1967. Problems and use of structure in the classification of vegetation. The diagnostic evaluation of structure in theBraun-Blanquet system. Acta Bot. Neerl. 15:495-511.Westhoff, V. and E. van der Maarel. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet approach. Pp. 617-726 In R. H. Whittaker (editor). Handbook ofvegetation science, Part V: ordination and classification of communities. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.Whittaker, R. H. 1962. Classification of natural communities. Botanical Review 28:1-239.Vegetation of <strong>Sumter</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> April 30 2004Copyright © 2004 <strong>NatureServe</strong>xviii
- Page 3: 1 NatureServe is an international o
- Page 11 and 12: types. However, when necessary, mod
- Page 13 and 14: [Association name = floristic nomin
- Page 15 and 16: Generally 5 or fewer occurrences an
- Page 17 and 18: All scientific names for vascular s
- Page 19: Summary: A short description of the
- Page 23 and 24: ALLIANCES BY US NATIONAL VEGETATION
- Page 25 and 26: virginiana, and Acer pensylvanicum
- Page 27 and 28: virginiana, Juniperus virginiana va
- Page 29 and 30: • Appalachian pine-oak forest (Ev
- Page 31 and 32: • Maritime Oak - Holly Forest / W
- Page 33 and 34: ALLIANCE CONCEPTSummary: This allia
- Page 35 and 36: Related Concepts:• Yellow-Poplar:
- Page 37 and 38: virginiana, Sanicula canadensis, De
- Page 39 and 40: Federal Lands: COE (Claiborne Lake)
- Page 41 and 42: ALLIANCE SOURCESReferences: Allard
- Page 43 and 44: Quercus alba and Quercus velutina a
- Page 45 and 46: USFS Ecoregions: 221Hc:CCC, 221He:C
- Page 47 and 48: ALLIANCE CONCEPTSummary: This allia
- Page 49 and 50: USFS Ecoregions: 221Eb:PP?, M221Ab:
- Page 51 and 52: Federal Lands: NPS (Great Smoky Mou
- Page 53 and 54: the associated species. More Appala
- Page 55 and 56: ALLIANCE DISTRIBUTIONRange: This al
- Page 57 and 58: USFS Ecoregions: 221Ha:CCC, 221Hc:C
- Page 59 and 60: elevation environments such as Leio
- Page 61 and 62: CULTIVATED FORESTEASTERN WHITE PINE
- Page 63 and 64: Federal Lands: DOD (Arnold, Fort Be
- Page 65 and 66: does not occur on wet soils. It occ
- Page 67 and 68: Liriodendron tulipifera, although o
- Page 69 and 70: ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 71 and 72:
ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 73 and 74:
Similar Associations:• Pinus echi
- Page 75 and 76:
• Pinus echinata - Quercus stella
- Page 77 and 78:
this association occurs in edaphica
- Page 79 and 80:
Vegetation: This forest typically h
- Page 81 and 82:
strobus can have high coverage and
- Page 83 and 84:
CONSERVATION RANKING & RARE SPECIES
- Page 85 and 86:
• Quercus alba - Carya alba / Euo
- Page 87 and 88:
muehlenbergii. In addition, Acer ba
- Page 89 and 90:
WHITE OAK - MOCKERNUT HICKORY / AME
- Page 91 and 92:
CONSERVATION RANKING & RARE SPECIES
- Page 93 and 94:
Vegetation: This association encomp
- Page 95 and 96:
ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONRange: This com
- Page 97 and 98:
• Quercus prinus - Carya spp. - Q
- Page 99 and 100:
catesbaei, Desmodium nudiflorum, Eu
- Page 101 and 102:
ELEMENT SOURCESReferences: Allard 1
- Page 103 and 104:
High-ranked species: No information
- Page 105 and 106:
Dynamics: No informationSimilar Ass
- Page 107 and 108:
protrusa, Grammitis nimbata (= Micr
- Page 109 and 110:
ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONRange: This for
- Page 111 and 112:
COMMON WATER-WILLOW HERBACEOUS VEGE
- Page 113 and 114:
• Betula nigra - Platanus occiden
- Page 115 and 116:
Formation: Temporarily flooded temp
- Page 117 and 118:
epeated flooding, this community ma
- Page 119 and 120:
USFS Ecoregions: 221Ba:CCC, 221Ha:C
- Page 121 and 122:
Classification Comments: On the Ban
- Page 123 and 124:
Classification Comments: This veget
- Page 125 and 126:
BIBLIOGRAPHYALNHP [Alabama Natural
- Page 127 and 128:
DeYoung, H. R. 1979. The white pine
- Page 129 and 130:
Gettman, R. W. 1974. A floristic su
- Page 131 and 132:
Lea, C. 2002a. Vegetation classific
- Page 133 and 134:
Pittman, Dr. Albert. Personal commu
- Page 135 and 136:
Tobe, J. D., J. E. Fairey, III, and