12.07.2015 Views

Proceedings with Extended Abstracts (single PDF file) - Radio ...

Proceedings with Extended Abstracts (single PDF file) - Radio ...

Proceedings with Extended Abstracts (single PDF file) - Radio ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COHERENT RADAR IMAGING AND THE EFFECTS OFREFLECTIVITY FIELD VARIATIONS AND BIOLOGICALCLUTTERB. L. Cheong 1 , M. W. Hoffman 1 , R. D. Palmer 1 , H. Tong 1 , V. Tellabati 1S. J. Frasier 2 and F. J. López-Dekker 21 University of Nebraska-Lincoln, U.S.A. 2 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, U.S.A.1. INTRODUCTIONThis brief article highlights the progress of simulation studies of the Turbulent Eddy Pro<strong>file</strong>r(TEP) ½ using a standard configuration and a new proposed array configuration. Variations onthe reflectivity field were found to have systematic bias on the radar imaging process using thetraditional Fourier method. By using the adaptive Capon method, the bias from the reflectivityvariations were significantly reduced. In addition, a study of the effects of biological clutterin the antenna sidelobes was conducted. Most cases of biological clutter occur from targetsin the sidelobes of the antenna. ¾ With a subtle change to the TEP array, it is possible touse the Capon beamforming method to virtually eliminate the effects of biological targets inthe antenna sidelobes on wind field estimates. It should be noted that the proposed arrayconfiguration does not have this beneficial effect using standard Fourier beamforming.2. EFFECTS OF REFLECTIVITY VARIATIONS ON RADAR IMAGINGOne of the main goals of this experiment is to study the variations of the reflectivity distributionon the imaging process. The numerical simulation presented uses a modified version of themethod of Holdsworth and Reid ¿ <strong>with</strong> a simple reflectivity pattern shown in Figure 1. AMeridional (deg)1050−5−10−10 −5 0 5 10Zonal (deg)Gain (dB)0−5−10−15Figure 1. Model reflectivity used in the simulation is a map <strong>with</strong> two bivariate Gaussian functions centered at (2 Æ ,4 Æ )and (-6 Æ ,-4 Æ ). A uniform horizontal wind from ¾ Æ at 25 ms ½ and a turbulent wind field of ¦½ ms ½ were used in thesimulation.50uniform horizontal wind (25 ms ½ at 45 Æ azimuth) and a turbulent wind field of ¦ 1ms½across the entire imaging region were used in this simulation. By using radar imaging <strong>with</strong>TEP, it is possible to reconstruct the reflectivity and wind fields <strong>with</strong>in the beam of the radar.The left panel of Figure 2 shows two reconstructed images using Fourier and Capon beamforming. An interesting feature is observed near the valley between the two reflectivity peaks.Note the systematic over and under estimation compared to the known actual horizontal velocityindicated by the <strong>single</strong> arrow in the upper right corner of each frame. Variations in thereflectivity pattern along the direction of the wind are accompanied by either systematic increases,decreases, or rotations in horizontal wind vector estimates. It appears that the variationis more significant in the case of the Fourier estimators than it is for the Capon estimates. Theright panel of Figure 2 illustrates the effects of reflectivity variations on the estimates of radialvelocity and Figure 3 illustrates the deterministic bias on the radial velocity estimates based onour theoretical argument.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!