APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES RESOURCE DOCUMENTFutureGen Alliance (2006). Final Request <strong>for</strong> Proposals <strong>for</strong> FutureGen Facility Host Site, 54 pp.http://www.futuregenalliance.org/news/futuregen_siting_final_rfp_3-07-2006.pdfGasda, S.E., Bachu, S., <strong>and</strong> Celia, M.A. (2004). The potential <strong>for</strong> CO 2 leakage from storage sites in geologicalmedia: Analysis of well distribution in mature sedimentary basins. Environmental Geology 46 (6–7), 707–720.Gibson-Poole, C.M., Root, R.S., Lang, S.C., Streit, J.E., Hennig, A.L., Otto, C.J., <strong>and</strong> Underschultz, J. (2005).Conducting comprehensive analyses of potential sites <strong>for</strong> geological CO 2 storage. Greenhouse Gas ControlTechnologies: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, ed.E.S. Rubin, D.W. Keith <strong>and</strong> C.F. Gilboy, Vol. I, 673–681.Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics <strong>for</strong> Natural Resources Evaluation. Ox<strong>for</strong>d University Press.Grambow, B., Loida, A., Martinez-Esparza, A., Diaz-Arcoas, P., De Pablo, J., Paul, J.-L., Marx. G., Glatz. J.-P.,Lemmens. K., Ollila. K., <strong>and</strong> Christensen. H. (2000). Source term <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance assessment of spent fuel as awaste <strong>for</strong>m. EUR 19140, European Commission Report, Nuclear Science <strong>and</strong> Technology, 356 pp.Helton, J.C., Anderson, D.R., Jow, H.-N., Marietta, M.G., <strong>and</strong> Basabilvazo, G. (1999). Per<strong>for</strong>mance assessment insupport of the 1996 compliance certification application <strong>for</strong> the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Risk Analysis 19(5), 959–986.Herzog, H., Caldeira, K. <strong>and</strong> Reilly, J. (2003). An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of temporarycarbon storage. Climatic Change 59 (3), 293–310.Ho, C.-H., Smith, E.L., <strong>and</strong> Keenan, D.L. (2006). Hazard area <strong>and</strong> probability of volcanic disruption of the proposedhigh-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA. Bulletin of Volcanology 69, 117–123.Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., Van der Linden, P.J., <strong>and</strong> Xiaosu, D. (2001). Climate Change2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of theInternational Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Port Chester, N.Y.Hoversten, G.M., Gritto, R., Washbourne, J., <strong>and</strong> Daley, T.M. (2003). Pressure <strong>and</strong> fluid saturation prediction in amulticomponent reservoir using combined seismic <strong>and</strong> electromagnetic imaging. Geophysics 68, 1580–1591.Hovorka, S.D., Benson, S.M., Doughty, C., Freifeld, B.M., Sakurai, S., Daley, T.M., Kharaka, Y.K., Holtz, M.H.,Trautz, R.C., Nance, H.S., Myer, L.R., <strong>and</strong> Knauss, K.G. (2006). Measuring permanence of CO 2 storage insaline <strong>for</strong>mations: The Frio experiment. Environmental <strong>Geosciences</strong> 13 (2), 105–121.Ide, S.T., Friedmann, S.J., <strong>and</strong> Herzog, H.J. (2006). CO 2 leakage through existing wells: Current technology <strong>and</strong>regulatory basis. 8 th Greenhouse Gas Technology Conference, Trondheim, Norway.IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG) (2006). 2nd Well Bore Integrity Network Meeting, Report2006/12.International Atomic Energy Agency (1989). Natural Analogues in Per<strong>for</strong>mance Assessments <strong>for</strong> the Disposal ofRadioactive Wastes. IAEA Technical Report 304, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.International Atomic Energy Agency (2003). Scientific <strong>and</strong> technical basis <strong>for</strong> the geologic disposal of radioactivewastes. IAEA Technical Report 413, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. Austria.IPCC (2005). Summary <strong>for</strong> policy makers. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture <strong>and</strong> Storage,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Interlachen, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, http://www.ipcc.ch.Jarrell, P.M., Fox, C.E., Stein, M.H., <strong>and</strong> Webb, S.L. (2002). Practical aspects of CO 2 flooding. Society of PetroleumEngineers Monograph 22, Richardson, TX, USA.Jessen, K., Michelson, M.L., <strong>and</strong> Stenby, E.H. (1998). Global approach to the calculation of minimum miscibilitypressure. Fluid Phase Equilibria 153, 251–263.Johnson, J.W., Nitao, J.J., <strong>and</strong> Morris, J.P. (2005). Reactive transport modeling of cap rock integrity during natural<strong>and</strong> engineered CO 2 storage. CO 2 Capture Project Summary 2, S. Benson, ed., Elsevier.Keith, D.W., Hassanzadeh, H., <strong>and</strong> Pooladi-Darvish, M. (2004). Reservoir engineering to accelerate dissolution ofstored CO 2 in brines. 7 th International Greenhouse Gas Technology Conference, Vancouver, Canada.Appendix 1 • 50<strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Needs</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Geosciences</strong>: Facilitating 21 st Century Energy Systems
APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES RESOURCE DOCUMENTKharaka, Y.K., Cole, D.R., Hovorka, S.D., Gunter, W.D., Knauss, K.G., <strong>and</strong> Freifield, B.M. (2006). Gas-water-rockinteractions in Frio Formation following CO 2 injection: Implications <strong>for</strong> the storage of greenhouse gases insedimentary basins. Geology 34, 577–580.Knauss, K.G., Johnson, J.W., <strong>and</strong> Steefel, C.I. (2005a). Evaluation of the impact of CO 2 , contaminant, aqueous fluid<strong>and</strong> reservoir rock interactions on the geologic sequestration of CO 2 . Chemical Geology 217, 339–350.Knauss, K.G., Johnson, J.W., <strong>and</strong> Kharaka, Y.K. (2005b). Preliminary reactive transport modeling <strong>and</strong> laboratoryexperiments conducted in support of the Frio Pilot Test. NETL 4 th Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration,Alex<strong>and</strong>ria, VA, ExchangeMonitor Publications.Kuo, W.-S., Driscoll, M.J., <strong>and</strong> Tester, J.W. (1995). Re-evaluation of the deep drillhole concept <strong>for</strong> disposing ofhigh-level nuclear wastes. Nuclear Science Journal 32 (3), 229–248.Kuuskraa, V.A., DiPietro, P., <strong>and</strong> Koperna, G.J. (2006). CO 2 storage capacity in depleted <strong>and</strong> near-depleted US oil<strong>and</strong> gas reservoirs. NETL 5 th Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Alex<strong>and</strong>ria, VA, ExchangeMonitorPublications.Larsen, J.W. (2004). The effects of dissolved CO 2 on coal structure <strong>and</strong> properties. International Journal of CoalGeology 57 (1), 63–70.Lemons, J. (1996). Uncertainties in the disposal of high-level nuclear waste. Scientific Uncertainty <strong>and</strong> itsImplications <strong>for</strong> Environmental Problem Solving, J. Lemons, ed., Blackwell Publishing, 40–90.Li, X.Y. (1997). Fractured reservoir delineation using multicomponent seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting 45,39–64.Lidskog, R., <strong>and</strong> Andersson, A.-C. (2002). The management of radioactive waste: A description of ten countries.Svensk Kaernbraenslehantering AB (SKB), 107 pp.Long, J.C.S., <strong>and</strong> Ewing, R.C. (2004). Yucca Mountain: Earth-science issues at a geologic repository <strong>for</strong> high-levelnuclear waste. Annual Review of Earth <strong>and</strong> Planetary Sciences 32, 363–401.Lundqvist, B. (2006). The Swedish program <strong>for</strong> spent-fuel management. Geological Challenges in RadioactiveWaste Isolation Fourth Worldwide Review, P.A. Witherspoon <strong>and</strong> G.S. Bodvarsson, eds., E.O. LawrenceBerkeley National Laboratory, University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Berkeley, CA, 227–237.Lutze, W. <strong>and</strong> Ewing, R.C. (1988). Radioactive Waste Forms <strong>for</strong> the Future. North-Holl<strong>and</strong>, Amsterdam, 778 pp.Lynch, R., McBride, E., Perkins, T., <strong>and</strong> Wiley, M. (1985). Dynamic kill of an uncontrolled CO 2 well. Society ofPetroleum Engineers, SPE 11378.McFarl<strong>and</strong>, J.R., Reilly, J.M., <strong>and</strong> Herzog, H.J. (2004). Representing energy technologies in top-down economicmodels using bottom-up in<strong>for</strong>mation. Energy Economics 26 (4), 685–707. Special Issue EMF 19 AlternativeTechnology Strategies <strong>for</strong> Climate Change Policy, J.P. Weyant, ed.Miles, N., Davis, K., <strong>and</strong> Wyngaard, J. (2005). Detecting Leaks from CO 2 Reservoirs using MicrometeorologicalMethods. Carbon Dioxide Capture <strong>for</strong> Storage in Deep Geologic Formations—Results from the CO 2 CaptureProject, v. 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring <strong>and</strong> Verification, S.M. Benson, ed.,Elsevier, London, 1031–1044.MIT (2007). The Future of Coal. Options in a Carbon-Constrained World, 175 pp. http://web.mit.edu/coal/Murphy, W.M. (2000). Natural analogs <strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance assessment <strong>for</strong> geologic disposal of nuclear waste.Materials <strong>Research</strong> Society Symposium Proceedings 608, 533–544.National <strong>Research</strong> Council (1957). The Disposal of Radioactive Waste on L<strong>and</strong>.National <strong>Research</strong> Council (1996). Glass as a Waste Form <strong>and</strong> Vitrification Technology. National Academy Press,Washington, DC, 108 pp.National <strong>Research</strong> Council (2001). Disposition of High-Level Waste <strong>and</strong> Spent Nuclear Fuel: The ContinuingSocietal <strong>and</strong> Technical Challenges, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.<strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Needs</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Geosciences</strong>: Facilitating 21 st Century Energy Systems Appendix 1 • 51
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTSBasic Science Chal
- Page 9 and 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTSTechnology Impacts
- Page 13 and 14:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYpurpose of linking
- Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTIONWorldwide e
- Page 17 and 18:
INTRODUCTIONway into the rock forma
- Page 19 and 20:
PANEL REPORTSMULTIPHASE FLUID TRANS
- Page 21:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 24 and 25:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 26 and 27:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 28 and 29:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 30 and 31:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 32 and 33:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 34 and 35:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 36 and 37:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 38 and 39:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 40 and 41:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 42 and 43:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 44 and 45:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 46 and 47:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 48 and 49:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 50 and 51:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 52:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 56 and 57:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 58 and 59:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 60 and 61:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 62 and 63:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 64 and 65:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 66 and 67:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 68 and 69:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 70 and 71:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 72 and 73:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 74 and 75:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 76 and 77:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 78 and 79:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 80 and 81:
66 Basic Research Needs for Geoscie
- Page 82 and 83:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 84 and 85:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 86 and 87:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 88 and 89:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 90 and 91:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 92 and 93:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 94 and 95:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 96 and 97:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 98 and 99:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 100 and 101:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 102 and 103:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 104 and 105:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 106 and 107:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 108 and 109:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 110 and 111:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 112 and 113:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 114 and 115:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 116 and 117:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 118 and 119:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 120 and 121:
106 Basic Research Needs for Geosci
- Page 122 and 123:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:MINERAL
- Page 124 and 125:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:MINERAL
- Page 126 and 127:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:MINERAL
- Page 128 and 129:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:NANOPAR
- Page 130 and 131:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:NANOPAR
- Page 132 and 133:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:NANOPAR
- Page 134 and 135:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:NANOPAR
- Page 136 and 137:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 138 and 139:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 140 and 141:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 142 and 143:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 144 and 145:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 146 and 147:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION: TRANSP
- Page 148 and 149:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION: TRANSP
- Page 150 and 151:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION: TRANSP
- Page 152 and 153:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION: TRANSP
- Page 154 and 155:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:FLUID-I
- Page 156 and 157:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:FLUID-I
- Page 158 and 159:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:FLUID-I
- Page 160 and 161:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:BIOGEOC
- Page 162 and 163:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:BIOGEOC
- Page 164 and 165:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:BIOGEOC
- Page 166 and 167:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:BIOGEOC
- Page 168 and 169:
154 Basic Research Needs for Geosci
- Page 170 and 171:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:THE MICROSOPIC B
- Page 172 and 173:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:THE MICROSOPIC B
- Page 174 and 175:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:HIGHLY REACTIVE
- Page 176 and 177:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:HIGHLY REACTIVE
- Page 178 and 179:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:HIGHLY REACTIVE
- Page 180 and 181:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:THERMODYNAMICS O
- Page 182 and 183:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:THERMODYNAMICS O
- Page 184 and 185:
REFERENCESBenner, S.G., Hansel, C.M
- Page 186 and 187:
REFERENCESChen, J., Hubbard, S., Pe
- Page 188 and 189:
REFERENCESEnnis-King, J., Preston,
- Page 190 and 191:
REFERENCESHolman, H.-Y., Perry, D.L
- Page 192 and 193:
REFERENCESLi, L., and Tchelepi, H.A
- Page 194 and 195:
REFERENCESNeal, A.L., Techkarnjanar
- Page 196 and 197:
REFERENCESReeves, P.C., and Celia,
- Page 198 and 199:
REFERENCESSteefel, C.I., DePaolo, D
- Page 200 and 201:
REFERENCESZachara, J.M., Ainsworth,
- Page 202 and 203: AppendicesBasic Research Needs for
- Page 204 and 205: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 206 and 207: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 208 and 209: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 210 and 211: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 212 and 213: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 214 and 215: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 216 and 217: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 218 and 219: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 220 and 221: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 222 and 223: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 224 and 225: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 226 and 227: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 228 and 229: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 230 and 231: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 232 and 233: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 234 and 235: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 236 and 237: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 240 and 241: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 242 and 243: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 244 and 245: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 246 and 247: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 248 and 249: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 250 and 251: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 254 and 255: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 256 and 257: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 258 and 259: APPENDIX 2: WORKSHOP PROGRAMThursda
- Page 260 and 261: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 262 and 263: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 264 and 265: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 266 and 267: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 268 and 269: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 270 and 271: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 272 and 273: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 274 and 275: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 276 and 277: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 278 and 279: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 280 and 281: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 282 and 283: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 284 and 285: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 286: APPENDIX 4: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATI