APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES RESOURCE DOCUMENTNuclear Energy Agency (2001). Reversibility <strong>and</strong> Retrievability in Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Waste, NuclearEnergy Agency of the OECD, Paris.Nuclear Energy Agency (2003) Engineered Barrier Systems <strong>and</strong> the Safety of Deep Geological Repositories: Stateof-the-artReport, Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD, Paris.Office of Technology Assessment (1985). Managing the nation’s commercial high-level radioactive waste. OTA-O-171.Oldenburg, C.M., Stevens, S.H., <strong>and</strong> Benson, S.M. (2004). Economic feasibility of carbon sequestration withenhanced gas recovery (CSEGR). Energy 29, 1413–1422.ONDRAF/NIRAS (2007). Long-term management of category C waste.http://www.nirond.be/engels/7.5.3_CategoryC_eng.htmlOnstott, T.C. (2005). Impact of CO 2 injections on deep subsurface microbial ecosystems <strong>and</strong> potential ramifications<strong>for</strong> the surface biosphere. In Carbon Dioxide Capture <strong>for</strong> Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results fromthe CO 2 Capture <strong>and</strong> Storage Project, Vol. 2 – Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring <strong>and</strong>Verification, S.M. Benson, ed., Elsevier, 1217–1249.Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., <strong>and</strong> Berlitz, K. (1994). Verification, validation, <strong>and</strong> confirmation of numericalmodels in the Earth Sciences. Science 263, 641–646.Pacala, S., <strong>and</strong> Socolow, R. (2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem <strong>for</strong> the next 50 years withcurrent technologies. Science 305, 968–972.Pawar, R.J., Edwards, E.B., Whitney, E.M., Nikravesh, M., Aminzadeh, F., <strong>and</strong> Zadeh, L.A. (2003). Geostatisticalcharacterization of the Carpinteria field, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Developments in Petroleum Science 51, 553–581.Peters, M.T., <strong>and</strong> Ewing, R.C. (2007). A science-based approach to underst<strong>and</strong>ing waste <strong>for</strong>m durability in open <strong>and</strong>closed nuclear fuel cycles. Journal of Nuclear Materials 362(2-3), 395-401.Petit, J.R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N.I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile, I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M.,Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M., Kotlyakov, V.M., Legr<strong>and</strong>, M., Lipenkov, V.Y., Lorius, C., Pépin, L., Ritz, C.,Saltzman, E., <strong>and</strong> Stievenard, M. (1999). Climate <strong>and</strong> atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from theVostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 399, 429–436.Phelps, T.J., McCallum, S.D., Cole, D.R., Kharaka, Y.K., <strong>and</strong> Hovorka, S.D. (2006). Monitoring geological CO 2sequestration using perfluorocarbon gas tracers <strong>and</strong> isotopes. 5 th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture <strong>and</strong>Sequestration, Alex<strong>and</strong>ria, VA, ExchangeMonitor Publications.Phillips, W.S., Rutledge, J.T., House, L.S., <strong>and</strong> Fehler, M.C. (2002). Induced microearthquake patterns inhydrocarbon <strong>and</strong> geothermal reservoirs: Six case studies. Pure <strong>and</strong> Applied Geophysics 159, 345–369.Poinssot, C., Toulhoat, P., Grouiller, J.-P., Pavageau, J., Piron, J.-P., Pelletier, M., Dehaudt, P., Cappelaere, C.,Limon, R., Desgranges, L., Jegou, C., Corbel, C., Maillard, S., Faure, M.-H., Cicariello, J.-C., <strong>and</strong> Masson, M.(2001). Synthesis on the Long Term Behavior of the Spent Nuclear Fuel. vol. I <strong>and</strong> II, Report CEA-R-5958, 616pp.Pruess, K., García, J., Kovscek, T., Oldenburg, C., Rutqvist, J., Steefel, C., <strong>and</strong> Xu, T. (2004). Code intercomparisonbuilds confidence in numerical simulation models <strong>for</strong> geologic disposal of CO 2 . Energy 29, 1431–1444.Pruess, K. (2006). On leakage from geological storage reservoirs of CO 2 . Proceedings, International Symposium onSite Characterization <strong>for</strong> CO 2 Geological Storage, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA,178–181.Raleigh, C.B., Healy, J.D., <strong>and</strong> Bredehoeft, J.D. (1976). An experiment in earthquake control of Rangely, Colorado.Science 191, 1230–1237.Ramirez, A.L., Nitao, J.J., Hanley, W.G., Aines, R., Glaser, R.E., Sengupta, S.K., Dyer, K.M., Hickling, T.L., <strong>and</strong>Daily, W.D. (2005). Stochastic inversion of electrical resistivity changes using a Markov Chain Monte Carloapproach. Journal of Geophysical <strong>Research</strong> 110, B02101, doi:10.1029/2004JB003449.Appendix 1 • 52<strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Needs</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Geosciences</strong>: Facilitating 21 st Century Energy Systems
APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES RESOURCE DOCUMENTRamirez, A., Friedmann, S.J., Foxall, W.A., Kirkendall, B., <strong>and</strong> Dyer, K. (2006). Subsurface imaging of CO 2 plumesusing multiple data types <strong>and</strong> Bayesian inference, 5 th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture <strong>and</strong> Sequestration,Alex<strong>and</strong>ria, VA, ExchangeMonitor Publications.Reeves, S., Taillefert, A., Pekot, L., <strong>and</strong> Clarkson, C. (2003). The Allison Unit CO 2 —ECBM Pilot: A reservoirmodeling study. DE-FC26-0NT40924, Topical Report, U.S. Department of Energy.Riddi<strong>for</strong>d, F., Wright, I., Espie, T., <strong>and</strong> Torqui, A. (2004). Monitoring geological storage: In Salah Gas CO 2 StorageProject. 7 th International Greenhouse Gas Technology Conference, Vancouver, Canada.Rutqvist, J., Birkholzer, J., <strong>and</strong> Tsang, C. (2006). Modeling of geomechanical processes during injection in a multilayeredreservoir-caprock system <strong>and</strong> implications on site characterization. Proceedings, InternationalSymposium on Site Characterization <strong>for</strong> CO 2 Geological Storage, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,Berkeley, CA, 232–234.Saripalli, K.P., Mahasenan, N.M., <strong>and</strong> Cook, E.M. (2003). Risk <strong>and</strong> hazard assessment <strong>for</strong> projects involving thegeological sequestration of CO 2 . Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas ControlTechnologies (GHGT-6), ed. J. Gale <strong>and</strong> Y. Kaya, 1–4 October 2002, Kyoto, Japan, Pergamon, vol. 1, 511–516.Shipton, Z.K., Evans, J.P., Dockrill, B., Heath, J.E., Williams, A., Kirschner, D., <strong>and</strong> Kolesar, P.T. (2005). Naturalleaking CO 2 -charged systems as analogs <strong>for</strong> failed geologic sequestration reservoirs. The CO 2 Capture <strong>and</strong>Storage Project (CCP) II, D.C. Thomas <strong>and</strong> S.M. Benson, eds., Elsevier Science, 679–701.Shoesmith, D.W., Kolar, M., <strong>and</strong> King, F. (2003). A mixed-potential model to predict fuel (uranium dioxide)corrosion within a failed nuclear waste container. Corrosion 59 802–816.Skinner, L. (2003). CO 2 blowouts—An emerging problem: Well control <strong>and</strong> intervention. World Oil 224, 38–42.Smith, K.L., Lumpkin, G.R., Black<strong>for</strong>d, M.G., Day, R.A., <strong>and</strong> Hart, K.P. (1992). The durability of Synroc. Journalof Nuclear Materials 190, 287–294.Spycher, N., <strong>and</strong> Pruess, K. (2005). CO 2 -H 2 O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO 2 . II. Partitioning inchloride brines at 12–100ºC <strong>and</strong> up to 600 bar. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 69, 3309–3320.Stalkup, F.I. (1987). Displacement behavior of the condensing/vaporizing gas drive process. Society of PetroleumEngineers, SPE 16715.Stenhouse, M.J., Zhou, W., <strong>and</strong> Arthur, R. (2006). Site characterization needs from a risk assessment perspective.Proceedings, International Symposium on Site Characterization <strong>for</strong> CO 2 Geological Storage, LawrenceBerkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 23–25.Stevens, S. (1999). Sequestration of CO 2 in depleted oil <strong>and</strong> gas fields: Barriers to overcome in implementation ofCO 2 capture <strong>and</strong> storage (disused oil <strong>and</strong> gas fields). IEA/CON/98/31, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.Streit, J.E., <strong>and</strong> Hillis, R.R. (2004). Estimating fault stability <strong>and</strong> sustainable fluid pressures <strong>for</strong> underground storageof CO 2 in porous rock. Energy 29, 1445–1456.Swift, P.N., <strong>and</strong> Corbet, T.F. (2000). The geologic <strong>and</strong> hydrogeologic setting of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.Reliability Engineering & System Safety 69 (1–3), 47–58.Thambimuthu, K., Soltanieh, M., <strong>and</strong> Abanades, J.C. (2005). Chapter 3: Capture. IPCC Special Report on CarbonDioxide Capture <strong>and</strong> Storage, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Interlachen, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>,http://www.ipcc.ch, pp. 3-1 to 3-114.U.S. Climate Change Technology Program (CCTP) (2006). Strategic Plan. September 2006, 224 p.,http://www.climatetechnology.gov/stratplan/final/index.htmVan Iseghem, P. (2001). Glass in Its Disposal Environment: Proceedings of the International Topical Workshop onGlass in its Disposal Environment—Bruges, Belgium, April 11–14, 2000. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Belgium.Watson, M.N., Boreham, C.J., <strong>and</strong> Tingate, P.R. (2004). Carbon dioxide <strong>and</strong> carbonate elements in the OtwayBasin: Implications <strong>for</strong> geological storage of carbon dioxide. The APPEA Journal 44 (1), 703–720.Wilson, E.J., Friedmann, S.J., <strong>and</strong> Pollak, M.F. (2007 in press). <strong>Research</strong> <strong>for</strong> deployment: Incorporating risk,regulation, <strong>and</strong> liability <strong>for</strong> carbon capture <strong>and</strong> sequestration. Environmental Science <strong>and</strong> Technology.<strong>Basic</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Needs</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Geosciences</strong>: Facilitating 21 st Century Energy Systems Appendix 1 • 53
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTSBasic Science Chal
- Page 9 and 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTSTechnology Impacts
- Page 13 and 14:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYpurpose of linking
- Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTIONWorldwide e
- Page 17 and 18:
INTRODUCTIONway into the rock forma
- Page 19 and 20:
PANEL REPORTSMULTIPHASE FLUID TRANS
- Page 21:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 24 and 25:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 26 and 27:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 28 and 29:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 30 and 31:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 32 and 33:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 34 and 35:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 36 and 37:
PANEL REPORT: MULTIPHASE FLUID TRAN
- Page 38 and 39:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 40 and 41:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 42 and 43:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 44 and 45:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 46 and 47:
PANEL REPORT: CHEMICAL MIGRATION PR
- Page 48 and 49:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 50 and 51:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 52:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 56 and 57:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 58 and 59:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 60 and 61:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 62 and 63:
PANEL REPORT: SUBSURFACE CHARACTERI
- Page 64 and 65:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 66 and 67:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 68 and 69:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 70 and 71:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 72 and 73:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 74 and 75:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 76 and 77:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 78 and 79:
PANEL REPORT: MODELING AND SIMULATI
- Page 80 and 81:
66 Basic Research Needs for Geoscie
- Page 82 and 83:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 84 and 85:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 86 and 87:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 88 and 89:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 90 and 91:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 92 and 93:
GRAND CHALLENGE: COMPUTATIONAL THER
- Page 94 and 95:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 96 and 97:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 98 and 99:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 100 and 101:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 102 and 103:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 104 and 105:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 106 and 107:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 108 and 109:
GRAND CHALLENGE:INTEGRATED CHARACTE
- Page 110 and 111:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 112 and 113:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 114 and 115:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 116 and 117:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 118 and 119:
GRAND CHALLENGE: SIMULATION OF MULT
- Page 120 and 121:
106 Basic Research Needs for Geosci
- Page 122 and 123:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:MINERAL
- Page 124 and 125:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:MINERAL
- Page 126 and 127:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:MINERAL
- Page 128 and 129:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:NANOPAR
- Page 130 and 131:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:NANOPAR
- Page 132 and 133:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:NANOPAR
- Page 134 and 135:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:NANOPAR
- Page 136 and 137:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 138 and 139:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 140 and 141:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 142 and 143:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 144 and 145:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:DYNAMIC
- Page 146 and 147:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION: TRANSP
- Page 148 and 149:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION: TRANSP
- Page 150 and 151:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION: TRANSP
- Page 152 and 153:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION: TRANSP
- Page 154 and 155:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:FLUID-I
- Page 156 and 157:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:FLUID-I
- Page 158 and 159:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:FLUID-I
- Page 160 and 161:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:BIOGEOC
- Page 162 and 163:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:BIOGEOC
- Page 164 and 165:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:BIOGEOC
- Page 166 and 167:
PRIORITY RESEARCH DIRECTION:BIOGEOC
- Page 168 and 169:
154 Basic Research Needs for Geosci
- Page 170 and 171:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:THE MICROSOPIC B
- Page 172 and 173:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:THE MICROSOPIC B
- Page 174 and 175:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:HIGHLY REACTIVE
- Page 176 and 177:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:HIGHLY REACTIVE
- Page 178 and 179:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:HIGHLY REACTIVE
- Page 180 and 181:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:THERMODYNAMICS O
- Page 182 and 183:
CROSSCUTTING ISSUE:THERMODYNAMICS O
- Page 184 and 185:
REFERENCESBenner, S.G., Hansel, C.M
- Page 186 and 187:
REFERENCESChen, J., Hubbard, S., Pe
- Page 188 and 189:
REFERENCESEnnis-King, J., Preston,
- Page 190 and 191:
REFERENCESHolman, H.-Y., Perry, D.L
- Page 192 and 193:
REFERENCESLi, L., and Tchelepi, H.A
- Page 194 and 195:
REFERENCESNeal, A.L., Techkarnjanar
- Page 196 and 197:
REFERENCESReeves, P.C., and Celia,
- Page 198 and 199:
REFERENCESSteefel, C.I., DePaolo, D
- Page 200 and 201:
REFERENCESZachara, J.M., Ainsworth,
- Page 202 and 203:
AppendicesBasic Research Needs for
- Page 204 and 205: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 206 and 207: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 208 and 209: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 210 and 211: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 212 and 213: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 214 and 215: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 216 and 217: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 218 and 219: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 220 and 221: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 222 and 223: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 224 and 225: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 226 and 227: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 228 and 229: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 230 and 231: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 232 and 233: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 234 and 235: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 236 and 237: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 240 and 241: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 242 and 243: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 244 and 245: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 246 and 247: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 248 and 249: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 250 and 251: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 252 and 253: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 256 and 257: APPENDIX 1: TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVES
- Page 258 and 259: APPENDIX 2: WORKSHOP PROGRAMThursda
- Page 260 and 261: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 262 and 263: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 264 and 265: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 266 and 267: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 268 and 269: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 270 and 271: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 272 and 273: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 274 and 275: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 276 and 277: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 278 and 279: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 280 and 281: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 282 and 283: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 284 and 285: Basic Research Needs for Geoscience
- Page 286: APPENDIX 4: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATI