12.07.2015 Views

effectiveness of modular training at farmers - IPMS Information ...

effectiveness of modular training at farmers - IPMS Information ...

effectiveness of modular training at farmers - IPMS Information ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The d<strong>at</strong>a in the Table reveal th<strong>at</strong> there are different actors who were involved in <strong>farmers</strong>’<strong>modular</strong> <strong>training</strong>. About 91.7%, 3.3% and 5.0% <strong>of</strong> the trainees were selected by developmentagents, PA leaders and administr<strong>at</strong>ive staff respectively.The criteria used to select the <strong>farmers</strong> th<strong>at</strong> are underlined by the guideline <strong>of</strong> <strong>modular</strong> <strong>training</strong>were: Innov<strong>at</strong>ive, cre<strong>at</strong>ive, interested and voluntary youth who have been withdrawn fromschools and involved in agricultural activities, those who engaged in agricultural activities,model and exemplary <strong>farmers</strong>, age <strong>of</strong> 18 and above, both male and female <strong>farmers</strong>, grade fourand above and ability to share knowledge obtained to their colleagues (Adebabay et al.,2008). As a m<strong>at</strong>ter-<strong>of</strong>-fact, the selections made so far show th<strong>at</strong> both male and female<strong>farmers</strong> have not particip<strong>at</strong>ed equally in <strong>modular</strong> <strong>training</strong>s. The criteria <strong>of</strong> educ<strong>at</strong>ionalbackground were viol<strong>at</strong>ed in selection processes because illiter<strong>at</strong>e <strong>farmers</strong> and those withoutschooling were included and trained in <strong>modular</strong> <strong>training</strong>. It shows th<strong>at</strong> the care taken for theselection was made in a hurry.4.1.3. Training cycle4.1.3.1. Training Need Assessment (TNA)As per the evidence obtained from focused group discussions <strong>of</strong> development agents, therewas an <strong>at</strong>tempt made by development agents and Woreda experts to conduct <strong>training</strong> needassessment, but it lacks particip<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> different stakeholders and direct beneficiaries ortrainees before organizing <strong>farmers</strong>’ <strong>training</strong>. Emphasis was not given for the needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>farmers</strong>before the delivery <strong>of</strong> the <strong>training</strong>. Wh<strong>at</strong> they did was, selecting <strong>farmers</strong> who are presumed tobe or was progressive <strong>farmers</strong> or team leaders <strong>of</strong> development activities and <strong>training</strong> wasconducted based on the issues wh<strong>at</strong> they have in the texts obtained from top levels.Training need assessment can be conducted through direct observ<strong>at</strong>ion, questionnaire,consult<strong>at</strong>ion, focused group discussion, review <strong>of</strong> documents on the locality, tests, records,and work samples. On contrary, <strong>modular</strong> <strong>training</strong> has got deficiency in almost all <strong>of</strong> thesementioned techniques. Hence, this result agreed with the findings <strong>of</strong> Kefyalew (2006) who43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!