- Page 1 and 2: EFFECTIVENESS OF MODULAR TRAINING A
- Page 3 and 4: SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIESHARAMAYA
- Page 5: STATEMENT OF AUTHORFirst of all, I
- Page 9 and 10: ACKNOWLEDGMENTFirst and foremost le
- Page 11 and 12: TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)2.5. E
- Page 13 and 14: LIST OF TABLESTablepageTable 1. Est
- Page 15 and 16: LIST OF TABLES IN THE APPENDIXAppen
- Page 17 and 18: 1. INTRODUCTION1.1. Background of t
- Page 19 and 20: since 2004 in Ethiopia. Farmers wer
- Page 21 and 22: undertaken. If institutions focused
- Page 23 and 24: panel discussion, conference, exper
- Page 25 and 26: 2. LITERATURE REVIEWIn this chapter
- Page 27 and 28: Figure1. Four Stages of the TIER Mo
- Page 29 and 30: Level 1: Reactions: At this level,
- Page 31 and 32: In 1963, agricultural extension was
- Page 33 and 34: stated objectives which involves co
- Page 35 and 36: trainees’ farm cooperation and co
- Page 37 and 38: Modular training was supposed to gi
- Page 39 and 40: achievement of a corporation purpos
- Page 41 and 42: e examined, defined and described b
- Page 43 and 44: FTCs are expected to play active ro
- Page 45 and 46: deficient in training skills, espec
- Page 47 and 48: 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGYIn this chap
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 4. Map of the study Area (Fo
- Page 51 and 52: 3.2.2. Sample size and sampling pro
- Page 53 and 54: 3.2.3. Types and sources of dataTo
- Page 55 and 56: 3.2.5. Method of data analysisBased
- Page 57 and 58:
Table 4: Profiles of respondentsNo
- Page 59 and 60:
The data in the Table reveal that t
- Page 61 and 62:
4.1.3.3. Delivery of modular traini
- Page 63 and 64:
also have not participated with ful
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 8: Knowledge test of sample h
- Page 67 and 68:
4.2.2. PracticePractice was operati
- Page 69 and 70:
The responses of farmers were categ
- Page 71 and 72:
system. Actors’ interactions can
- Page 73 and 74:
FTCs and this project supports only
- Page 75 and 76:
4.3.5. Actor linkage matrixActor li
- Page 77 and 78:
According to actor linkage matrix;
- Page 79 and 80:
followed by projects, NGOs and rese
- Page 81 and 82:
may have access for information abo
- Page 83 and 84:
4.5.3. Lessons learned from better
- Page 85 and 86:
SWOT AnalysisStrength, Weakness, Op
- Page 87 and 88:
Opportunities• Participatory plan
- Page 89 and 90:
Practice was assessed based on trai
- Page 91 and 92:
with communication media, articles,
- Page 93 and 94:
BoARD and SWHISA (Bureau of Agricul
- Page 95 and 96:
IPMS (Improving Productivity and Ma
- Page 97 and 98:
Taddesse Mulugeta, 2007. Rural wate
- Page 99 and 100:
Appendix Table 1. Category of train
- Page 101 and 102:
Appendix Table 5: Extent of linkage
- Page 103 and 104:
3.2. What do you think about the ti
- Page 105 and 106:
4.5 Practice (Indicate whether you