Space Shuttle <strong>Program</strong> Historic Properties 5-46<strong>NASA</strong>-wide Roll-up Report5.3.11 Type 11: Resources Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with Space Flight RecoverySeven historic properties are classified as Type 11 resources:• MDD <strong>at</strong> DFRC• SLF Runways <strong>at</strong> WSSH• SLF Runway <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>• Landing Aids Control Building <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>• MDD <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>• Retrieval ship Liberty Star <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>• Retrieval ship Freedom Star <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>All are eligible under NRHP Criterion A as exceptionally significant facilities th<strong>at</strong>facilit<strong>at</strong>ed the recovery and reuse of the spacecraft and its major components after theirreturn to Earth. Some are also distinguished by their design and construction, and thus,are eligible under Criterion C. Five properties are loc<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>, and one each is loc<strong>at</strong>ed<strong>at</strong> DFRC and WSSH. All seven historic properties are also classified as Type 1:Resources Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with Transport<strong>at</strong>ion, and are described and illustr<strong>at</strong>ed in Section5.3.1.5.3.12 Type 12: Resources Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with Processing PayloadsThree properties <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>, the Canister Rot<strong>at</strong>ion Facility and the two Payload Canisters,are classified as Type 12 resources. The two Payload Canisters are described andillustr<strong>at</strong>ed in Section 5.3.1 as Type 1: Resources Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with Transport<strong>at</strong>ion; theCanister Rot<strong>at</strong>ion Facility is described and depicted in Section 5.3.2 as a Type 2: VehicleProcessing Facility.July 2008Archaeological Consultants, Inc.
Space Shuttle <strong>Program</strong> Historic Properties 6-1<strong>NASA</strong>-wide Roll-up Report6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS6.1 Overview of Significant Historic PropertiesAs a result of <strong>NASA</strong>’s agency-wide survey and assessment of SSP-rel<strong>at</strong>ed historicfacilities, 70 assets were identified which individually meet the NRHP criteria ofeligibility. This number includes 19 personal property assets (the three orbiters, tworetrieval ships, two payload canisters, two SLF runways, two Crawler Transporters, threeMLPs, the barge Poseidon, the Pacific Scientific Furnace, the OLF, the Crawlerway, andthe Clock and Flag Pole). All surveyed real and personal property assets are <strong>NASA</strong>owned.The WSSH SLF runways are loc<strong>at</strong>ed on property leased by <strong>NASA</strong> from the U.S.Army, and the OLF and Shuttle Orbiter Final Assembly Building are on property leasedfrom the U.S. Air Force <strong>at</strong> AFP 42 in Palmdale. The Pacific Scientific Furnace is housedin PWR’s Canoga Park Facility.Collectively, these buildings, structures, and objects embody the historical developmentsof the U.S. Space Shuttle <strong>Program</strong>, from the early period of development through thenear final years of oper<strong>at</strong>ion. Many of the historic properties were originally built tosupport the Apollo <strong>Program</strong>, and were modified and adaptively reused for the SSP.Others were specially built as new facilities to meet the unique needs of the SSP.6.1.1 Chronology of Infrastructure DevelopmentThe 70 exceptionally important SSP-rel<strong>at</strong>ed historic properties were first constructedbetween 1943 and 1996. Fourteen were originally built prior to 1960, and 34 wereconstructed in the 1960s, largely in support of S<strong>at</strong>urn/Apollo. The other 22 historicproperties were designed and built exclusively for the SSP during the 1970s, 1980s, and1990s.The oldest facilities used in support of the SSP pred<strong>at</strong>e the birth of <strong>NASA</strong>. The historicproperties built before 1960 include Runway 17/35 <strong>at</strong> WSSH (l<strong>at</strong>e 1940s); the 8 by 6SWT (1949) and the 10 by 10 SWT (1955) <strong>at</strong> GRC; the ALDF (1956) <strong>at</strong> LaRC; the CocaI Test Stand and associ<strong>at</strong>ed Coca Control Center (both 1956) <strong>at</strong> SSFL; Building 150 <strong>at</strong>Palmdale (1958); and seven facilities <strong>at</strong> MSFC, including the Office and Wind TunnelFacility (1943), as well as the l<strong>at</strong>e 1950s M<strong>at</strong>erials and Processes Labor<strong>at</strong>ory; Structures,Dynamics and Thermal Vacuum Labor<strong>at</strong>ory; HOSC/NDC; Multi-Purpose High BayFacility and NBS; and the N<strong>at</strong>ional Center for Advanced Manufacturing. To varyingdegrees, all were modified to support oper<strong>at</strong>ions for the SSP. Similarly, with fewexceptions, facilities constructed during the 1960s, including large rocket engine teststands and Apollo-era launch facilities, were adapted for use in support of the SSP duringthe 1970s and 1980s. Modific<strong>at</strong>ions included large building additions, as well as upgradesto equipment, without alter<strong>at</strong>ion to the physical structure. A chronology of selectedfacility modific<strong>at</strong>ions, additions and upgrades is provided in Table 6.1July 2008Archaeological Consultants, Inc.