Space Shuttle <strong>Program</strong> Historic Properties 5-8<strong>NASA</strong>-wide Roll-up ReportAir-rel<strong>at</strong>ed resources: Subtype Runways• SLF Runway <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>• SLF Runways <strong>at</strong> WSSHThe <strong>KSC</strong> SLF Runway<strong>KSC</strong> SLF Runway, looking north.(Source: Archaeological Consultants, Inc., 2006)• Built in 1976 to support the SSP• <strong>NASA</strong>’s preferred shuttle landing site,since 1984• The return from landing site followinglanding <strong>at</strong> Edwards AFB• Site where all five orbiters originallyarrived from the assembly plant inPalmdale• Used as a practice facility by Shuttleastronauts• Eligible under Criterion A as the primarylanding site for the SSP, and underCriterion C for its design andconstruction. It is one of the largestrunways in the world.The SLF Runways <strong>at</strong> WSSHWhite Sands Space Harbor, Runway 23/05, lookingsouthwest.(Source: White Sands Test Facility, wstf0606e04460)• The three runways, built or modifiedbetween the l<strong>at</strong>e 1940s and 1986,replic<strong>at</strong>e the shuttle landing runways <strong>at</strong><strong>KSC</strong> (Runway 17/35), Edwards AFB(Runway 23/05), and the TransoceanicAbort Landing (TAL) sites (Runway20/02).• Runway 17/35 was originally constructedin the l<strong>at</strong>e 1940s, and modified for theSSP in 1976. Runway 23/05 was built in1978 and Runway 20/02 d<strong>at</strong>es to 1986.• Serves as a contingency landing site forthe Shuttle orbiter• Provides 70-80% of the Shuttle pilot’sShuttle Training Aircraft (STA) training• Eligible under Criterion A as the onlyfacility in the history of the SSP used on acontingency basis when Columbia (STS-3) could not land <strong>at</strong> Edwards AFB. Alsosignificant as the primary trainingloc<strong>at</strong>ion for Shuttle pilots andcommanders. Under Criterion C, therunways are eligible for their design andconstruction.July 2008Archaeological Consultants, Inc.
Space Shuttle <strong>Program</strong> Historic Properties 5-9<strong>NASA</strong>-wide Roll-up ReportAir-rel<strong>at</strong>ed resources: Subtype M<strong>at</strong>e/Dem<strong>at</strong>e Devices (MDD)• OLF <strong>at</strong> Palmdale• MDD <strong>at</strong> DFRC• MDD <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>Four MDDs were configured by <strong>NASA</strong> to support the <strong>at</strong>tachment and detachment of theShuttle orbiter and SCA. The OLF in Palmdale complements permanent MDDs erected <strong>at</strong>DFRC and <strong>at</strong> <strong>KSC</strong>. It was originally designed to be quickly disassembled, moved, andreassembled <strong>at</strong> a contingency landing site. <strong>NASA</strong> also constructed a mobile, derrick-andcraneMDD <strong>at</strong> the MSFC in Huntsville, Alabama (1976), reusing a stiff-legged derrickfrom an early 1960s engine test stand. Used <strong>at</strong> MSFC from 1976 through 1979, <strong>NASA</strong>subsequently disassembled the improvised mobile MDD in Huntsville and transported itsderrick to the WSMR in New Mexico to support the third Shuttle landing in 1982. Themobile MDD, no longer extant, was the precursor to the OLF. The <strong>KSC</strong>, and itsarchitectural-engineering contractor Connell Associ<strong>at</strong>es of Miami, were responsible forthe DFRC, <strong>KSC</strong>, and MSFC/WSMR MDDs of the 1970s. The JSC developed theunderlying concept for the OLF.The MDDs <strong>at</strong> DFRC and <strong>KSC</strong> were both designed by Connell Associ<strong>at</strong>es. While nearlyidentical in appearance, the MDD <strong>at</strong> DFRC is more complex than its counterpart <strong>at</strong> the<strong>KSC</strong>, mainly due to some unique personnel safety fe<strong>at</strong>ures required as part of the ALTprogram. These fe<strong>at</strong>ures include an access/egress route for SCAPE-suited personnel, twopersonnel hoists, a compressed air system, emergency showers and eye-face washfe<strong>at</strong>ures, wash down st<strong>at</strong>ions, and a deluge system to protect personnel in the event of ahypergol spill or ground-level fire. The DFRC MDD is also distinguished by a personnelelev<strong>at</strong>or loc<strong>at</strong>ed to the west of the south tower, and a ladder with safety cage in the northtower, for access to the 100-foot level.The Orbiter Lifting Frame <strong>at</strong> PalmdaleOrbiter Lifting Frame, looking northwest.(Source: Archaeological Consultants, Inc., 2006)• Originally built <strong>at</strong> Vandenberg;reassembled <strong>at</strong> Palmdale in l<strong>at</strong>e 1990/early 1991• First used to m<strong>at</strong>e Endeavour to theSCA for transport to the <strong>KSC</strong>• Used between 1991-2001 to m<strong>at</strong>edem<strong>at</strong>ethe orbiters for transportbetween <strong>KSC</strong> and Palmdale for majoroverhaul and maintenance• Eligible under NRHP Criteria A and Cas the SSP’s only demountable MDD,and for its oper<strong>at</strong>ional use in themaintenance, overhaul, and upgradingof the orbiters Columbia, Discovery,Atlantis and Endeavour during the1990s. Under Criterion C, notable for itsunique design and engineering as alightweight demountable device.July 2008Archaeological Consultants, Inc.